No more GR4 WSOs?
Thread Starter
No more GR4 WSOs?
I've just read on UKAR that the last batch of WSOs have been trained by 100 Sqn. As the GR4 out of service date is not until 2020, could be argued that this last batch will stretch to then, without any need to train anymore?
FB
FB
Moi, they stopped recruiting some time ago, hence why this is the last batch.
I presume planning has been done, looking at the number of qualified GR4 backseaters still around in other jobs who could come back to the force. Let's hope they don't all PVR or something...!
The more-cynical answer is that they're assuming the OSD will come left considerably after 2015 when we leave Afghanistan.
I presume planning has been done, looking at the number of qualified GR4 backseaters still around in other jobs who could come back to the force. Let's hope they don't all PVR or something...!
The more-cynical answer is that they're assuming the OSD will come left considerably after 2015 when we leave Afghanistan.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
And as I said before, if a stick monkey they can probably get another SM in the back.
Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 17th May 2012 at 06:49.
they can probably get another SM in the back
Quote:
they can probably get another SM in the back
Wouldn't be the first time...several new F3 pilots found themselves in the back seat for a short period circa 2000-1.
they can probably get another SM in the back
Wouldn't be the first time...several new F3 pilots found themselves in the back seat for a short period circa 2000-1.
We tried using Fighter Controllers in the boot of an F3 and quite frankly they could do some of the tasks very well but lacked airmindedness and airmanship. We tried using AEOs and AEOps in the boot of Tornados various, but they were trained for larger ISTAR types and lacked the low/medium/high level Nav skills. In my opinion, Navs aren't precious or skilled more than other branch (they might be cleverer!!), but you can train anyone to do anything; but can't assume that training for another role (ie. Pilot) will make them good for something else (ie. WSO Nav).
Just my opinion after seeing this tried a few times over my 22 years...
LJ
Last edited by Lima Juliet; 17th May 2012 at 19:56.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bloody hell LJ.
You could be nailed to a tree for that kind of heresy around here!
Pilots not omnicompetent Gods who have descended from the skies?!!
Burn him! He's a witch.
You could be nailed to a tree for that kind of heresy around here!
Pilots not omnicompetent Gods who have descended from the skies?!!
Burn him! He's a witch.
Last edited by Finnpog; 18th May 2012 at 06:47.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Not quite where I'd like to be
Age: 65
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leon Jabachjabicz:
Oh really? When, and to what end? I can't imagine why the Nav Mafia would even contemplate such a thing. I know many AEOps who have gone on to be successful Tornado pilots and navs, on commissioning and after training of course. Don't get too precious about RADAR manipulation and EW, they have been core skills of NCA for many years, long before the first Tornado nav learnt to switch on his computerized RHWR. As for low level nav skills, you'd better ask all the rotary wing NCA how they get on with that.
Navigators - protecting seats whilst eyeing ups everybody else's since 1942.
We tried using AEOs and AEOps in the boot of Tornados various
Navigators - protecting seats whilst eyeing ups everybody else's since 1942.
Last edited by sargs; 18th May 2012 at 15:53.
Questions, questions...
They tried AEOs and AEOps for Tornado in the 80s and they didn't crack it - hence the big uptake of Navs for Tornado in the late 80s and early 90s to replace the aging F4/Bucc/V-force Navs.
Stealing since 1942 eh? Try 1915 when the Observer was first used in WW1 - this turned into Nav and Bomb Aimer in 1942. Air Gunners started 1939, which broke off into Air Signaller in 1943 and Radar Observer in 1941 - blobbing them up into AEO and AEOp that did not come along until 1963! The biggest travesty was when the WSO and WSOp was formed in 2003 by blobbing all the aircrew brevets into 1 - apart from the FCs, ATs, IAs and PJis!!! The original plan was for a 2-wing badge for FJ Navs that would be renamed Weapons Systems Officers or WSOs like the rest of the Western World. Somehow, some bunch of senior officers f@cked it all up and came up with the abomination of the WSO/WSOp and the d0gsh!t badge that goes with it - they would have been better bringing back the Flying-O Observer badge as it at least it had some history behind it (in fact it would be more senior than the RAF pilots' wings as they came along in 1918 and the seniors would never have supported that!).
As for RW WSOp LL nav - funny I thought the co-pilot did that and the WSOp dished out the Mars bars and manned up the General or the Mini-Gun on ops?
Don't forget that Navs have been using RWR/RADAR in Meteors/Javelins/Buccs/F4s for as long as AEO/AEOps have been around since 1963.
Finally, if you re-read my post you will see that I said you can train anyone to do anything (mostly) - hence that is why the AEOps that you mention became Tornado Pilots and Navs.
LJ
They tried AEOs and AEOps for Tornado in the 80s and they didn't crack it - hence the big uptake of Navs for Tornado in the late 80s and early 90s to replace the aging F4/Bucc/V-force Navs.
Stealing since 1942 eh? Try 1915 when the Observer was first used in WW1 - this turned into Nav and Bomb Aimer in 1942. Air Gunners started 1939, which broke off into Air Signaller in 1943 and Radar Observer in 1941 - blobbing them up into AEO and AEOp that did not come along until 1963! The biggest travesty was when the WSO and WSOp was formed in 2003 by blobbing all the aircrew brevets into 1 - apart from the FCs, ATs, IAs and PJis!!! The original plan was for a 2-wing badge for FJ Navs that would be renamed Weapons Systems Officers or WSOs like the rest of the Western World. Somehow, some bunch of senior officers f@cked it all up and came up with the abomination of the WSO/WSOp and the d0gsh!t badge that goes with it - they would have been better bringing back the Flying-O Observer badge as it at least it had some history behind it (in fact it would be more senior than the RAF pilots' wings as they came along in 1918 and the seniors would never have supported that!).
As for RW WSOp LL nav - funny I thought the co-pilot did that and the WSOp dished out the Mars bars and manned up the General or the Mini-Gun on ops?
Don't forget that Navs have been using RWR/RADAR in Meteors/Javelins/Buccs/F4s for as long as AEO/AEOps have been around since 1963.
Finally, if you re-read my post you will see that I said you can train anyone to do anything (mostly) - hence that is why the AEOps that you mention became Tornado Pilots and Navs.
LJ
Last edited by Lima Juliet; 18th May 2012 at 21:27.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sargs wrote:
I think the answer to that would be; "At much, much slower speeds!"
Leon wrote:
I am the living proof of that. An ex SAC from Air Traffic who can now drive aeroplanes, albeit slower than Leon.
As for low level nav skills, you'd better ask all the rotary wing NCA how they get on with that.
Leon wrote:
Finally, if you re-read my post you will see that I said you can train anyone to do anything (mostly)
Last edited by airpolice; 19th May 2012 at 09:19.
Leon,
very little nav on ops. Big line of mountains East to West, river North to South at one end, city of Kandahar dwarfed by massive airbase at the other.
Most of the time it's IP to grid work once in the green zone and by that point the NCA are firmly nailed to the trigger [for good reason].
However, I know ex-SH crewmen who now reside in both seats of GR4's - so it isn't some mystical art.
Manning up the General and dishing out the mars bars? - I think you need to get out more.
Airpolice - Yes, at much lower speeds.
very little nav on ops. Big line of mountains East to West, river North to South at one end, city of Kandahar dwarfed by massive airbase at the other.
Most of the time it's IP to grid work once in the green zone and by that point the NCA are firmly nailed to the trigger [for good reason].
However, I know ex-SH crewmen who now reside in both seats of GR4's - so it isn't some mystical art.
Manning up the General and dishing out the mars bars? - I think you need to get out more.
Airpolice - Yes, at much lower speeds.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
LJ, remind me where
conducted in the Typhoon?
In fact an SM back seat tour on the Tonka might be beneficial to future tiffy drivers.
As for FC backenders in the F3, I knew a couple, in fact one upgraded my PC for me. Your
is equally true but they seem to have coped in the last 20 years.
the RADAR manipulation/handling/interpretation is a skills and RHWR and ECM handling is
In fact an SM back seat tour on the Tonka might be beneficial to future tiffy drivers.
As for FC backenders in the F3, I knew a couple, in fact one upgraded my PC for me. Your
Fighter Controllers in the boot of an E3 also did some of the tasks very well but lacked airmindedness and airmanship.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Made me chuckle as I typed it (simple things amuse...and all that!)
This isn't work, it's entertainment.