Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Stanley

Old 19th May 2013, 18:10
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tarn et Garonne, Southwest France
Posts: 5,283
Top tip, M2. Why didn't they tell me that earlier?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 19th May 2013, 23:15
  #42 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 45
Posts: 71
may I ask if you refer to the crater shown on the picture linked below? (I mean not the one on the runway side, but the second one which has a written indication that I cant actually get to read)

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...ml#post7074058
CAW is offline  
Old 19th May 2013, 23:21
  #43 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 45
Posts: 71
crater

izod tester,

when you say this:

"I remember that the RE had considerable difficulty repairing the bomb crater between the Control Tower and the FiGAS hangar and the repair was delayed several days whilst they extracted a bulldozer which had been pushing hard core into the hole."

can you tell us which one of the craters shown in the picture linked below are you talking about?? (Id guess its the one which has a written note, below the runway...)

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...ml#post7074058
CAW is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 07:51
  #44 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Have been doing a spot of redesign and the site is back on now

Thanks for everyone's input, really valuable.

The series is complete now, it was originally a three parter; Atlantic Conveyor, San Carlos FoB and Port Stanley Airport but the last one kind of grew as I started writing it to include Black Buck and RAF Stanley

A trilogy in 5 parts!

The Atlantic Conveyor #Falklands30 | Think Defence

Harrier Forward Operating Base ? Falkland Islands | Think Defence

And on Port Stanley

That Famous Runway at Port Stanley ? Part 1 (Pre Conflict) | Think Defence

That Famous Runway at Port Stanley ? Part 2 (Conflict) | Think Defence

That Famous Runway at Port Stanley ? Part 3 (Post Conflict) | Think Defence

On my original question about San Carlos FoB, it seems the runway surface was pretty much anything the sappers could lay their hands on; MEXE pads, PSP and the materials they used for helicopter landing pads onboard the civilian ships.

Feedback, as ever, is always very much welcome
Think Defence is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 09:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lixwm,Flintshire
Posts: 257
Tried all five links, all came back forbidden on this server. Is there a problem?
ColinB is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 11:08
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 61
Posts: 371
ColinB the links worked on my PC.
PhilipG is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 13:10
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Forest of Dean
Posts: 195
The crater I was referring to is the third black arrow up from bottom left.
izod tester is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 13:43
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: buckinghamshire
Posts: 75
I arrived in Stanley in early 1985 and was intrigued to find that the entrance to the HQBFFI mess at Lookout (assorted tents and cabins) had a floor made of AM2 matting. Having been involved in the procurement and movement of said matting I reckoned that it was without doubt the most expensive mess entrance anywhere in the 3 services!
bspatz is offline  
Old 20th May 2013, 20:17
  #49 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Sorry about any access problems, have just transferred to a new host so the DNS needs to propagate.

Interestingly, had a comment on one of the posts from Dave Morgan DSC which confirms the San Carlos FOB runway was PSA 1.

One of the great things about this kind of material is how it provides an opportunity for people to contribute to the accuracy of the post I am very grateful for it.
Think Defence is offline  
Old 21st May 2013, 00:46
  #50 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 45
Posts: 71
Ive writing my own account of airfields and planes in the Malvinas for over two years now. If it all goes according to my plans, it might be turning into a book late this year.

Regarding FOB San Carlos, I remember reading somewhere that the matting used there was gathered out of the existance that some RFA ships had, since most of the actual FOB sunk with the Atlantic Conveyor. How accurate could this be?

Also, Id like to ask if anyone has information regarding a second FOB erected sometime between southern winter 1982 and late 1983 in the Goose Green area.

One last note: there is some information about RN SHARs taking up the interception role around August 1982, maybe due to the fact that RAF Stanley had to suffer major refurbishing works, or maybe because of some harrasment from the west. I tend to believe those planes were based in some CV, but I failed to find out which one. Could it be Vince?

Last edited by CAW; 21st May 2013 at 00:47.
CAW is offline  
Old 21st May 2013, 01:03
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,007
ISTR several lengths of AM2 being used at Murray Heights as bridges, as well as a second-hand UH-1 main rotor blade.
diginagain is offline  
Old 31st May 2013, 20:14
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 180INS500
Posts: 137
The original runway plus the extension were laid with AM2, some of the original Harrier dispersals were laid with PSP. It was the 26 end of the runway that was re-laid. Because most arrivals were from the East and the F-4s did carrier-style 'arrivals' into the cable with the added benefit of 'chute popped just before touchdown, the matting was 'creeping' and had developed a bit of a hump. Normal ops were suspended midnight Fri 22 Apr 83, and 1500ft of matting was taken up leaving about 4400ft useable runway. C-130 Tankers were launched and recovered during Sat and Sun along with Harriers. Full runway was back in use around mid-day Sun 24 April.
Single Spey is offline  
Old 31st May 2013, 20:30
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 171
Surely the CV at the time was Lusty.
tyne is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2013, 14:07
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 286
@ExBlanketStacker:

I think it was about 1999 the single fuel concept can into being.
My recollection is that the decision was taken much earlier, in the early '80s.

The last petrol powered vehicle I can remember is the early APV which replaced the Piglets in West Belfast in 1985.

EG
ExGrunt is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2013, 21:01
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 61
Posts: 1,366
You would think being on GSE I would remember this, but can any Phantom crew members recall, after a sortie, when the first aircraft landed and took the RHAG, did the second aircraft wait till the first had cleared the runway, or did the second land with the first one still on the runway? I know we didn't start rewinding the cables in till both aircraft were down and off the runway.
Dan Gerous is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2013, 00:02
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,520
As far as I recall it ( v late 82/early 83) it was very definitely "one at a time". I think the possible consequences of a missed "trap" by a second F-4 with one still on the runway ruled out doing anything else .

Last edited by wiggy; 5th Jul 2013 at 00:06.
wiggy is online now  
Old 5th Jul 2013, 11:58
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 61
Posts: 1,366
I thought that was how it worked Wiggy. I was trying to recall if the first one landed, unhooked, then went down to the end, to let the second one in. Since the majority of landings were towards Stanley, I suppose the stop was near enough the Phandet turnoff, to allow the jets to turn in there. They certainly didn't hang about when landing.
Dan Gerous is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 00:12
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 216
The rules were only 1 F4 airborne unless the C130 tanker was also up - unless there was a QRA scramble and then the C130 got airborne asap after the F4s. That way if there was any problem after the first one landed the second one could be re-fuelled if necessary.
WIDN62 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 06:07
  #59 (permalink)  
CAW
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Argentina
Age: 45
Posts: 71
If I may ask to both of you, could you recall how often those QRA sorties were lunched between late 82 and the openning of MPA?

Im trying to figure out some pics I have of an argentinian Navy Electra been "escorted" by a couple of F-4s and I have two different dates for 1983 and another pair for 1985... could it be that there were that many incidents? Were any QRA lunched against the Mirage fighters the AAF placed in Rio Gallegos by December 1982?
CAW is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2013, 08:41
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 42
Could you share these photos with us?
thowman is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.