Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Wildcat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Dec 2011, 21:46
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"F*** Me, it's a Lynx!!! "

with a WG30 tail.....
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 21:48
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the same tail they used for the speed record. In about 1982...
I'm Off! is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 21:52
  #63 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
"It might look like a Duck (with the exception of the distinctive tailplane which provides the pilot with improved stability) and fly like a Duck, but......"
...it's a Duck.
Two's in is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 14:41
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems a lightweight version is being planned for UKSF and will this impact on the Puma upgrade?

U.K. Special Forces To Use Wildcat Variant - Defense News
watchyourbaK is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 18:52
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
The Mk9A will still be the 'soup dragon@

Do they mean that 657 will get Wildcat (no surprise) or that 8 flt will get their own?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 19:16
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8 Flt has recently got brand new NSRWs so they won't be getting Wildcat.
Lynxman is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 21:48
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Perhaps 815 HQ will get a few more.
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 22:11
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could have spent a third less, got the capability they wanted, and called it the "Black Hawk". Dubious contracts, what, who.........retired with how much at the expense of our soldiers lives, no that would be treason.
tonker is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 09:50
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And done that 20years ago...
nice castle is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 17:04
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Swindon
Age: 72
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duck

If it looks like a duck ,quacks like a duck and swims like a duck. It is a f---ing duck. Substitute duck for Lynx/Wildcat, Same AFCS, same MRGB, same TRDS system, same MRH & blades. This is a "New helicopter on the cheap" based on the proven reliability of its predecessor. Full confidence in this then.
gazelle04 is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2011, 01:42
  #71 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, not the same MRGB, different inputs to AFCS! MRH and blades proven although new ones in development......
comedyjock is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 09:17
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a "New helicopter on the cheap"
You are absolutely right....wouldn't have got it through the system if it wasn't. Still a fantastic aircraft though (esp the RN version).
Bismark is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2011, 11:58
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PMSL, IT'S A LYNX [but different enough to charge ££££££ wonga!]

glad rag is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2012, 17:12
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest update regarding Wildcat

Compare the sorties flown to those of the Russian aircraft carrier's

Northern Fleet (NF) warships – aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov and large ASW ship Admiral Chabanenko – are pursuing a northern course to continue cruise through the North Atlantic towards home base. Prior to that, the ships have replenished supplies from auxiliary vessels in the Moray Firth.

Underway through the Atlantic, crews of the Russian Navy's carrier group will continue improving naval skills in severe conditions of cyclonically active northern latitudes. In favorable weather conditions, aircrews plan to proceed with training flights of deck-based fighters Su-33 and helicopters Ka-27.

Through the deployment started on Dec 6, 2011, pilots of the carrier group have performed about 350 sorties and acquired wide flight experience in different climatic zones and latitudes. Helicopter pilots have carried out 84 flights (out of over 200 sorties) in the night time.

As for now, aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov has covered over 12,000 nautical miles. The carrier group is expected to call at NF main base Severomorsk by the end of the next week, said NF Press Secretary Capt 1 rank Vadim Serga.
glojo is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 07:00
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For that, Wildcat needed to go at sea. It enjoyed two ten-day periods of trials aboard Iron Duke, one in mid-January, the second at the beginning of this month, ranging from the waters off the South Coast to the Western Approaches, Irish Sea and northern shores of Scotland as the frigate searched for suitable weather conditions to lay down the limits for safe Wildcat operations.
In all Wildcat touched down on Iron Duke’s flight deck 390 times, including 148 night landings – 76 of them using night vision goggles.
Hmmmm.
mandatory extra characters
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 08:26
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I thought the Wildcat was a WW2 Fighter..
stilton is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 08:45
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greenknight.


Hmmmm?
Tourist is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 13:55
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From the link posted by Glojo:

Prototype ZZ402 paid a brief visit to Iron Duke just before Christmas, when pilots and technicians tested some of the basics – could the flight deck recovery system pull Wildcat into the hangar (yes it could), did Wildcat fit in the hangar (ditto)...
Was it really not possible to know for sure whether the aircraft would fit into the hangar until it was actually tried with the real aircraft?!

I thought the Wildcat was a WW2 Fighter
So was the Typhoon...?
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 14:05
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The trial referred to was the PSIT before the SHOL work. This allows basic safety and integration activities to be completed alongside first - for example, moving the a/c from the flight deck to and from the hangar. The fact that Wildcat did actually fit in the hangar was not a surprise.
Charlie Time is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 15:02
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
You've never been on some T23s trying to get Merlin in the hangar have you?
alfred_the_great is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.