Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fears for Pentagon air power as Iran claims drone capture

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fears for Pentagon air power as Iran claims drone capture

Old 7th Dec 2011, 20:24
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,131
Received 319 Likes on 204 Posts
While what you say is true, 500, the Bush/Rummy "can't keep my mouth shut since I have to tell everyone how clever we are" team drove me to distraction with their weekly OPSEC violations while first 1, then 2, major armed conflicts were underway under their auspices.

I was reading stuff in the open press, at one point, that I was operating on which was classified with at least an S ... and some $^#%@$%!(*#$% had invited a reporter into (location X) and done a PR puff piece.

Don't get me started ... hmmm, seems I have already started ... Washington DC, since about the day W. J. Clinton was elected, has been "I have no idea what OPSEC is" personified. It is not confined to the current crowd.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 20:33
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W J Clinton
Well, what do you expect, if he can't keep his pants on, what hope has he of keeping his mouth shut

The one's that got me what cataloging in the press over time the weak points of various hardware. OK, everything has weak points but IMHO, no need to make it easy for everyone - especially those in the future that were not "on the ground" in Iraq to find out for themselves.
500N is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 21:16
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,333
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Drone, drone, DRONE!

Oh, FFS, it's not a flippin' drone. Drones were so-called for their fixed pitch noise as they flew past for anti-aircraft "ack ack" training and also for being called the De-Havilland Queen Bee like this one below:



So drones are dumb target aircraft for surface to air practise or even air to air (like Jindivik or QF-4s).

RQ-170s are Remotely Piloted Air Systems (RPAS) or Unmanned Air Systems (UAS) and not a "drone" - although, this one may have been shot down so it might be deemed a "drone" after all

Lesson over

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 21:58
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Semantics.

Since you understood the intent the term 'drone' obviously fits!
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2011, 22:54
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,333
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
@Willy Whyte

I also understand the intent of the word "willy" so in your head it would obviously fit!

LJ

PS Banter mode off...
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 02:57
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lonewolf

Here is exactly what we are talking about.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/wo...ce-bid.html?hp

"Iran said over the weekend that it had recovered the RQ-170, the same drone deployed over Osama bin Laden’s compound before he was killed in May. Senior intelligence officials were disturbed that the drone was publicly discussed in the coverage of the Bin Laden raid, in part because of the fear of exposing its use over Iran."


Better to say nothing.You never know how much a slip up over realsing info about it on the Bin Laden raid lead to Iran adding 2 and 2 together and deciding to do something about it - ie if it's there, can we bring it down.

Just my HO.

That whole Bin Laden's dead and this is how we did it crowing was a SF disaster.
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 07:08
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Yup, there is general acceptance that any unmanned (unpersonned...) aircraft is a 'drone'. Apart, perhaps, from the drone community itself.

This is presumably because most people are fed up with the drone people inventing yet another acronym / abbreviation every few weeks....RPV, UAV, UCAV, UAS....WTF? It's a sodding DRONE, pure and simple
BEagle is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 08:28
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, looks like we've temporarily run out of stuff to talk about so squabbling instead.

Now BEagle, you're right, it must never be an Unmanned Air Vehicle. Totally non-PC and unacceptable. It can be an Unpopulated Air Vehicle or even Unpersonned, as you say.

Anyway, a drone is a bee.

500N, hadn't seen that article before.

M2
Mach Two is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 08:45
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 1,102
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
The term RPAS was invented by the two winged master race of Her majesty's RAF for two reasons:

1. In the face of many comments from Harry Public and the press, to emphasise that there is a qualified human being operating the vehicle, especially when decisions are made to drop a weapon or not.

2. To ensure that the said two winged master race is still relevant in the 21st century in the face of more automation. I mean you cannot have Scopies or Air traffikers or even worse simple sailors or god forbid, artillery types operating these things can you? Can you? I mean for a start, they don't have natty green overalls to wear do they?
Widger is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 08:50
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And, of course, keep getting flying pay.

TAKE COVER!!!!!!
Mach Two is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 09:02
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M2

Re "500N, hadn't seen that article before."

Neither had I, it was only published in today's NY Times newspaper
and on my daily read, I happened to notice it and thought it very relevant
to this thread.

Even the "Senior intelligence officials" call it a drone !!!
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 09:26
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
M2, don't mention flying pay. You know what will happen!
APG63 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 09:57
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
APG, now you've mentioned flying pay as well. Stop it!
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 10:00
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only mentioned it because Mach Two did. Anyway, the point is that drone (or whatever) drivers get flying pay to do it. So that would be why they have to wear green overalls.
APG63 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 10:52
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I won't mention it for a while. I'm off to a sandy place for a few days. See you children later. TTFN.
Mach Two is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 15:49
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC News - Iran shows film of captured US drone
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 15:56
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 other interesting photos from different angles.

Fars News Agency :: Iran Displays Downed US Drone

Fars News Agency :: IRGC Commander Explains Downing of US Stealth Drone
500N is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:04
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is undamaged, then why are they hiding the underside?
Tourist is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:08
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is undamaged, then why are they hiding the underside?
Would that be where all the sensitive equipment would be located?

Could it be that this has been removed?
glojo is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:37
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,127
Received 93 Likes on 49 Posts
Looks too much like a model model tbh too many smooth surfaces and like propped upas in the models you see on stands at the likes of Farnborough and at Paris.

As a kid when building the Matchbox/Revell/Airfix/Hasagewa 1.72 kit models, had borrowed a book from the local library on how to create the perfect kit model and diorama and how to maximise use of a camera.

One page was on how to use a spacecraft model or satellite, suspend it with string on a blackboard background with stars dotted, and positioning of the camera on tripod with regard to distance and angle to produce a semi convincing picture of a satellite in space. Like the pre CGI and special effects used in films from the 40s onwards to the advent of George Lucas.

Anyhow it be nice if the Iranians put a couple of personnel beside said vehicle to determine scale and size.
chopper2004 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.