Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

SAR Frequencies

Old 18th Sep 2012, 08:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAR Frequencies

Could anyone confirm whether UK Search and Rescue aircraft are fitted with receivers for the 121.650 test and training frequency?
If not, do you have an alternative training channel for locator beacons rather than using the 121.5 live channel?

Many thanks.
ionagh is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 14:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 91
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We use 122.55 and 245.1 for training homing. We have training beacons to do this.
Jerry Can is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2012, 07:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply. It would appear that most locator beacons available may not be compatible with current SAR training ops.
As we are in the process of writing the EU standard for this equipment it needs to specify something that will actually be usable in the field.
ionagh is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2012, 08:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ionagh

that most locator beacons available may not be compatible with current SAR training ops
Why would any operational PLB need to operate on the training frequencies. We already have specific training PLBs.

As we are in the process of writing the EU standard for this equipment it needs to specify something that will actually be usable in the field.
Is this another example of the EU not knowing what it is talking about Operational beacons don't need to operate on the training frequencies they need to be simple, cheap and effective so they are available to most people who may need them. They don't need to have the capability to operate on training frequencies.

HF
Hummingfrog is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2012, 09:37
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally 2 types of PLB are available, operational type and training type.
My concern was having training versions specified that were incompatible with actual equipment fitted on SAR aircraft.

The other part of the problem is that these training PLBs have existed for years using non 121.5 frequencies but having put the requirement in print it has elicited the standard response from certain EU quarters of "you can't do that!"
ionagh is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2012, 09:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Since we stopped carrying PLBs on 121.5MHz and moved to 406 MHz equipment why are we still concerned about SAR on 121.5?
Whopity is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2012, 11:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
406MHz is used to talk to the satellites. The beacons still transmit a low power 121.5 signal for homing but it is not used to talk to satellites as the older ones did.
Deaf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.