Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Carrier Borne VC10 & Sentry anyone?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Carrier Borne VC10 & Sentry anyone?

Old 9th Oct 2011, 14:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Carrier Borne VC10 & Sentry anyone?

Article in the Sunday times notes a leaked email about the possible closure of Trapiani (apparently home to VC10 & Sentry) for RAF units taking part in ELLAMY, followed up with a quote from a 'defence source' noting that if we had carriers then this wouldnt be an issue as we wouldnt be dependent on host nation support.

Ignoring that the RN was very dependent on HNS during ELLAMY, could someone tell me when the RN Carrier capable VC10 & Sentry variants entered service again? Not quite sure that I remember seeing them flying from the decks of ARK ROYAL...
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 14:49
  #2 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Had 'em for years, but so secret even the pilots flying them didn't know.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 15:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'defence source'
I believe WEBF has started a new job recently .... he might be working at the desk next to you!!!
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 15:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not a rumour reference Trapani, it's unfortunately true....
lj101 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 16:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Herc'll do just about anything. USMC uses the EC-130V (awacs)



No need for a '10 or E-3.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:13
  #6 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
If we had a carrier on station, it would have had its own AEW and not needed AAR and got the job done much cheaper. Despite all. the BS, light Blue have contributed less than 10% of the sorties. We need 4 carrier capable F35 sqns to be truly effective. Most can see facts.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We need 4 carrier capable F35 sqns to be truly effective.
As much as this is getting very boring I don't think many people would disagree. But you can't bring a capability to the party if it doesn't yet exist. And two tiny GR9 squadrons are not the same as 4 F35 squadrons! And to buy part of what you wish for both the RAF and RN have taken significant hits. Can we move on from the historical Harrier/Carrier/GR4 point scoring and look forward to the future capabilities that will shortly arrive (assuming all the funding isn't diverted to pay for FRES....)

Of course, given that most of Libya is now in "friendly" hands (and assuming air support is still required) the question that should be asked is why aren't the RAF and AH deployed into Libya (or have I missed something)? Whilst the RAF Regt may be 'stretched' to provide FP I'm sure the Army would jump at the opportunity to get boots on the ground if recent media rumours are to be believed about the proposed future size of the Army post-Afg. I'm sure there are some old'n'bold still around who can point the young blades as to the airfields they should be going to. And hopefully then there will be no tanker support required!
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:36
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"If we had a carrier on station, it would have had its own AEW"

Sentry does a lot more than just AEW.

" not needed AAR"

VC10 is about tanking other nations assets too, and not just our own. Its a very useful coalition capability.

"light Blue have contributed less than 10% of the sorties"

Its effect on the target and not statistics that matters. Overall sortie numbers compared to Kosovo are (IIRC) roughly the same, despite there being 30% less aircraft. But as 101% of statistics are made up, its not an issue is it

"We need 4 carrier capable F35 sqns to be truly effective"

Given the RN was struggling to fill 1 enhanced Sqn (and by all accounts I've heard spent nearly 25 years struggling to sustain the 2 front line / 1 training harrier squadron), I'm looking forward to seeing where these squadrons will come from. Have we adopted Imperial Cloning Vats yet?
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 513
Received 156 Likes on 83 Posts
Jim

I think the last point re 800/801/899 is stretching it a bit. Don't seem to recall there being a problem pre JFH and the QFI shenanigans. However, standing by to be corrected by those who were in the SHAR force.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 18:54
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"I think the last point re 800/801/899 is stretching it a bit. Don't seem to recall there being a problem pre JFH and the QFI shenanigans. However, standing by to be corrected by those who were in the SHAR force"

Very happy to be corrected as well - I am concious there were post JHF shenannigans, but I always had the impression from people I spoke to that the SHAR force struggled to keep sufficient pilots in the force. Again, very happy to be corrected, in which case I'll amend my posts.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,536
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
If Trapani is to close, are there rumours as to where the NATO FOB will move?
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Perhaps to the other NATO FOB that is well used to hosting E-3s.

Has good access to the beach too:

Just This Once... is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The real world
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corsica, Malta, Cyprus, its not difficult!
Jayand is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Sentry does a lot more than just AEW"

And so does a bagger cab, and of course even the baggers can get more of their cabs airborne serviceable than the E3s.

Remind me of the E3 serviceability?
Tourist is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:29
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tourist

Remind me of the E3 serviceability?
Irrespective of it's serviceability rates it's bringing more to the party that the RN Carrier/Harrier force combined

Some of you guys really do need to start to let go
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:56
  #16 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Yet again a complete failure to acknowledge facts. SSNs and TLAMs for precision strike. CVS and Harriers for CAS and Apache for local. No other assets would be needed and the whole thing could have been done at a fraction of the price.

The RAFs comtribution was a very expensive Pantomime.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 19:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
E-3 serviceability???

Tourist you are having a giraffe. With 2 ac away for months they have flown each and every day!

Can't get any better than that.

Muppet.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 20:09
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 26 Posts
The RAFs comtribution was a very expensive Pantomime.
But, in the absense of any Carrier/ Harrier it was all there was, is or going to be for quite some time. Blame the politicos but no dark blue whinging or crying is going to make a difference, nor can you blame the RAF.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 20:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet again a complete failure to acknowledge facts
What, like the fact that at the time the conflict in Libya started there were no

Harriers for CAS
Getting very boring now.
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2011, 20:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Navaleye

The RAFs comtribution was a very expensive Pantomime.
Never quite sure what grates most with folk who write in this petulant manner, the fact that the RN were powerless do to do **** all or the fact that the RAF did and still are doing so well
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.