What punishment would a SofS get for breaching the official secrets act?
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I doubt there's a sexual element - seems pretty clear it's probably about money, but until they make clear who has made what money and how, the rumours about sex will continue.
Perhaps they want them to continue so we forget there might have been a financial, not sexual motive. It'd be much easier to say "OK, I'm gay/bi-sexual, even though I'm married" than to say "We've/he's had our/his snout(s) in the trough and it's all in a Swiss bank account".
Perhaps they want them to continue so we forget there might have been a financial, not sexual motive. It'd be much easier to say "OK, I'm gay/bi-sexual, even though I'm married" than to say "We've/he's had our/his snout(s) in the trough and it's all in a Swiss bank account".
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's sad and surprising that a minority here seem to have subconsciously absorbed the tabloids and decided he's guilty. He may be guilty (though I'm not sure what of? Upsetting the Guardian?), and certainly nothing is proven yet.
Given the circumstances, I think he's done a pretty reasonable job compared to his recent predecessors, most of whose names I can't even remember. Whilst that shouldn't stop him going if he is proven guilty of something serious, it would be frustrating to see him go because he had coffee with his mate one too many times and may have had 'a man stay in his flat oh he must be gay'.
Given the circumstances, I think he's done a pretty reasonable job compared to his recent predecessors, most of whose names I can't even remember. Whilst that shouldn't stop him going if he is proven guilty of something serious, it would be frustrating to see him go because he had coffee with his mate one too many times and may have had 'a man stay in his flat oh he must be gay'.
Not sure that Fox is guilty of any breach of security, but the only major breach that went unpunished (that I know about) dates from 1982 when former Labour Foreign Affairs minister Edward (Ted) Rowlands MP (now Baron Rowlands), in a debate in Parliament on the Falklands War on 3 April 1982 revealed that we (the British) were reading Argentine diplomatic codes. Rowlands was criticised for revealing this intelligence source, as the likely result of his disclosure was that the Argentinians would secure their systems and the intelligence would dry up. Mrs Thatcher called it "utterly devastating".
As Labour MP for Merthyr Tydfil, Rowlands was an experienced former Foreign Office minister in the Labour government who was involved in earlier Falklands negotiations in the late 1970's
He remained a Labour MP and from 1987 onwards served on the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. His "reading the codes" disclosure obviously had no effect on his future prospects as he was appointed a CBE in 2002, and in June 2004 he was given a life peerage, as Baron Rowlands of Merthyr Tydfil and of Rhymney.
As Labour MP for Merthyr Tydfil, Rowlands was an experienced former Foreign Office minister in the Labour government who was involved in earlier Falklands negotiations in the late 1970's
He remained a Labour MP and from 1987 onwards served on the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. His "reading the codes" disclosure obviously had no effect on his future prospects as he was appointed a CBE in 2002, and in June 2004 he was given a life peerage, as Baron Rowlands of Merthyr Tydfil and of Rhymney.
The clear fact that the MP didn't suffer or get abused from press for ever after have always brought me closer to the latter.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Liam Fox and Adam Werritty: latest - Telegraph
Good or bad?
Not sure. I'm unlikely to get my job back as a result of his departure so ultimately I don't give a to55.
Philip Hammond rumoured to take over SecDef. Don't know much about him.
Good or bad?
Not sure. I'm unlikely to get my job back as a result of his departure so ultimately I don't give a to55.
Philip Hammond rumoured to take over SecDef. Don't know much about him.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Livingston, Scotland
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Philip Hammond? Who's going to present Top Gear then?
The Beeb link for the resignation story is here:
BBC News - Liam Fox quits as defence secretary
The Beeb link for the resignation story is here:
BBC News - Liam Fox quits as defence secretary
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Philip Hammond
Why don't you make up your own mind?
The new Secretary of State, Defence may well be:
Philip Hammond
Conservative MP for Runnymede and Weybridge
Secretary of State, Transport (since 12 May 2010)
Although he seems to have an interesting stance on Trident.
The new Secretary of State, Defence may well be:
Philip Hammond
Conservative MP for Runnymede and Weybridge
Secretary of State, Transport (since 12 May 2010)
Although he seems to have an interesting stance on Trident.
Last edited by LFFC; 14th Oct 2011 at 16:09. Reason: Despite reports, it doesn't seem to be certain yet