Promotion and Tax bill - Scheme Pays info
Thread Starter
Promotion and Tax bill - Scheme Pays info
Have tried the MoD Intranet, RAF IBN 14/11 etc, but am looking for some info on the bill incurred on promotion..anyone able to help?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As on old sweat long retired from the RAF (1995), I find this incomprehensible - are today's guys financially punished by the filthy taxman on promotion?
So much so that, I'm told if you're very high rank and wish to advance much more, then don't expect to leave with any gratuity.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cloud9
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bill? WTF?
As on old sweat long retired from the RAF (1995), I find this incomprehensible - are today's guys financially punished by the filthy taxman on promotion?
If so, dear God - what have we come to?
HB
If so, dear God - what have we come to?
HB
Thread Starter
Red Line,
Den Flug in Bayern..Es war mir ein Vergnügen! Aber ich habe nicht gefördert wurde.
Nahh not me promoted..no point..PA all the way...just looking for some info for a mate who's been promoted to Wg Cdr...
Den Flug in Bayern..Es war mir ein Vergnügen! Aber ich habe nicht gefördert wurde.
Nahh not me promoted..no point..PA all the way...just looking for some info for a mate who's been promoted to Wg Cdr...
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On an Island
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can assure you that unless the guy has loooong service (circa 30 years) he has nothing to worry about. Tell him to look up the DIN and work it out for himself. If he can't he should turn down the promotion as he has failed the aptitude test.
T Letter 334/11 was distributed a day or two ago via Chf Clks, along with a plethora (or is it a thicket?) of DINs relating to this scheme.
The Scheme Pays means that it your are promoted and accruse a 'notional' gain to your pension pot of greater than GBP50K, the tax laibility will be taken from your pension when you draw it.
In other words: promotion = increased pension pot (notional) - increased tax laibility.
Encouraging, ain't it?
The Scheme Pays means that it your are promoted and accruse a 'notional' gain to your pension pot of greater than GBP50K, the tax laibility will be taken from your pension when you draw it.
In other words: promotion = increased pension pot (notional) - increased tax laibility.
Encouraging, ain't it?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Huey
A friend has just been promoted from Wg Cdr to Group Captain with around 25 years service. He has a tax bill of around £17,000 to pay by early 2013 OR if he does not pay this bill, takes a hit of up to £100,000 on his pension over its average term.
Best L
A friend has just been promoted from Wg Cdr to Group Captain with around 25 years service. He has a tax bill of around £17,000 to pay by early 2013 OR if he does not pay this bill, takes a hit of up to £100,000 on his pension over its average term.
Best L
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this to do with the Pension Tax Relief Lifetime Allowance being reduced? The DIN on the subject states:
'It is unlikely that Service personnel below the rank of 2* will exceed the revised lower LTA limit upon their retirement, unless they have additional pension arrangements beyond those provided by the Armed Forces pensions schemes. Those AFPS members affected will vary depending on future changes to the LTA and increases in military pay.'
How would the Wg Cdr/Gp Capt jump be affected (particularly as you can use allowances from previous years...)
I'm sure that there was a thread on this previously....
Above quoted T Letter 334/11 say this:
For the majority of personnel the introduction of Scheme Pays will have little impact. However, a small number of sqn ldrs and above leaving the Service on or after 11 Aug 11 who may have incurred a tax liability need to be aware of the option as they need to elect Scheme Pays before they leave.
whereas DIN967_2011 says this:The impact of these changes will depend very much on individual circumstances but it is most unlikely that any Other Ranks, or any Officer below OF 3 (Major and equivalents), will be subject to a tax charge.
Hmm, not the same thing...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Front seat of a Mahogany Bomber
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at current pay scale for (as an example) a 6 yr Wg Cdr on promotion to Gp Capt the pay increase is only about 6.7k. For pilots, with the accompanying change in flying pay, this drops to 4.3k. A personal tax liabilty of 17k as lj is quoting would mean a pilot would be down on the deal for the best part of 4 years (and that's ignoring tax!).
This unintended consequence of the change in regulations is bound to impact people accepting promotions (who would accept promotion onto a "job-by-job" contract when you could end up enemployed before earning enough to cover your tax liability?). I dread to think what kind of bill the good officer Peach has just been presented with!!
This unintended consequence of the change in regulations is bound to impact people accepting promotions (who would accept promotion onto a "job-by-job" contract when you could end up enemployed before earning enough to cover your tax liability?). I dread to think what kind of bill the good officer Peach has just been presented with!!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excommunicator
Forget flying pay as that never entered the pension calculation in the first place.
As people are now finding out, the tax calculation for lifetime and yearly increase in pension pot is a minefield. Read the guidance very carefully and remember that any unused portion of the last 3 years of allowance can be rolled forwards to allow a potential maximum £150,000 pension pot increase on promotion. But also remember that any yearly increment in pension (or pay-rise increment when there's not a pay freeze in force) also counts, so you might not have as much as that to play with. And if you're a fast mover rising rapidly in rank - then watch out!!
I understand that this subject took up a disproportionate amount of time during the last few senior officer command courses at Shriv and many long faces were noted in the bar!
So if the Gp Capt mentioned by LJ101 is a fast mover who has been contributing annually to his own personal pension plan, then I quite believe that he could well be in for a big hit.
PS. Remember also that your pension doesn't go up until a few years after you've been promoted. So if you were promoted 2 years ago and thought you got away with it - think again!!
Forget flying pay as that never entered the pension calculation in the first place.
As people are now finding out, the tax calculation for lifetime and yearly increase in pension pot is a minefield. Read the guidance very carefully and remember that any unused portion of the last 3 years of allowance can be rolled forwards to allow a potential maximum £150,000 pension pot increase on promotion. But also remember that any yearly increment in pension (or pay-rise increment when there's not a pay freeze in force) also counts, so you might not have as much as that to play with. And if you're a fast mover rising rapidly in rank - then watch out!!
I understand that this subject took up a disproportionate amount of time during the last few senior officer command courses at Shriv and many long faces were noted in the bar!
So if the Gp Capt mentioned by LJ101 is a fast mover who has been contributing annually to his own personal pension plan, then I quite believe that he could well be in for a big hit.
PS. Remember also that your pension doesn't go up until a few years after you've been promoted. So if you were promoted 2 years ago and thought you got away with it - think again!!
Last edited by LFFC; 21st Sep 2011 at 22:38.
A really depressing thread, but frankly what I have come to expect from the MOD and its constant claims of how much it values its personnel. It's hardly an incentive to work hard and progress knowing that you are going to get a tax bill for your efforts. Only in the 21st Century MOD 
....er, what's it got to do with the MOD? This is an action from the Treasury which effects all UK citizens. The MOD didn't get an exemption - but then why should it.
Maybe it could offer to internally compensate individuals, but no doubt that it itself would be seen as a taxable perk by the Treasury.....
Lay the blame where it is due, at the door of the tax office.
Maybe it could offer to internally compensate individuals, but no doubt that it itself would be seen as a taxable perk by the Treasury.....
Lay the blame where it is due, at the door of the tax office.
Biggus perhaps I should have said it is what I have come to expect from the UK as a whole. The general rush to the bottom, a celebration of mediocraty and hurdle after hurdle put in peoples' paths to discourage them from getting on in life and improving.
But yes, I will give you the fact that it is a Treasury measure designed to stop the 'fat cats' minimising their tax liabilities by shovelling large amounts of their already taxed salaries into pensions. It just happens to hit everyone else as well - I'd like to say the law of unintended consequences, but it that would be being overly generous as this government clearly thinks it needs our money more than we do. And for individuals that spend all their time on ops seeking to minimise collateral damage, that is effectively what MOD personnel are here.
But when the MOD spends all its time saying it values its people and time after time I have seen VSOs at or very close to the top state that pensions are a red line, the MOD seem to have rolled over very easily when that red line is first challenged and their claims yet again seem very hollow. At the end of the day, this measure will do more long term damage than anything else as the decent people who we should be promoting do the maths and work out they are better off not taking promotion. If the MOD really wanted to, it could have put up more of a fight than it did.
But yes, I will give you the fact that it is a Treasury measure designed to stop the 'fat cats' minimising their tax liabilities by shovelling large amounts of their already taxed salaries into pensions. It just happens to hit everyone else as well - I'd like to say the law of unintended consequences, but it that would be being overly generous as this government clearly thinks it needs our money more than we do. And for individuals that spend all their time on ops seeking to minimise collateral damage, that is effectively what MOD personnel are here.
But when the MOD spends all its time saying it values its people and time after time I have seen VSOs at or very close to the top state that pensions are a red line, the MOD seem to have rolled over very easily when that red line is first challenged and their claims yet again seem very hollow. At the end of the day, this measure will do more long term damage than anything else as the decent people who we should be promoting do the maths and work out they are better off not taking promotion. If the MOD really wanted to, it could have put up more of a fight than it did.