Canadian armed forces regain their Royal status
Thread Starter
Canadian armed forces regain their Royal status
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And we are just about to waste a significant amount of time, effort and money in doing the same re-invention of the wheel - we'll make everything 'Joint' or 'Defence' in a civil service/treasury led spin that alleges that it saves money and makes the military more efficient and effective, then in about 10 years time when we really understand what the real threat is for Future Force 2020, then we too will revert back to an Air, Navy and Army.
With certain limits, boundaries, and of course with resources Jointery is a combat enabler (not a combat solution), without resources it is just another cost saving measure masqueraded as an earth shattering discovery.
Well done Canada - and thank you, some us here also understand the importance of H M Queen, the Commonwealth and the history, tradition and ethos that brings.
With certain limits, boundaries, and of course with resources Jointery is a combat enabler (not a combat solution), without resources it is just another cost saving measure masqueraded as an earth shattering discovery.
Well done Canada - and thank you, some us here also understand the importance of H M Queen, the Commonwealth and the history, tradition and ethos that brings.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Royal Canadian Army
So, why no RCA? Admittedly they were the Canadian Army previously, but this is a, as some have said, "reinvention of the wheel"! What protocol dictates no 'Royal' for the Army?
The Royal Navy and Royal Air Force were created directly by the monarch through a Royal Charter as a single entity.
In contrast the British Army is a collective term for multiple regiments (some of which are Royal) but was not created as a single unified entity.
Standing by to be wrong.
In contrast the British Army is a collective term for multiple regiments (some of which are Royal) but was not created as a single unified entity.
Standing by to be wrong.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As Stuff said...
similarly, the Canadian Army was formed piecemeal over time, with some units being created by the crown directly (and thus having a "Royal Charter"), and some created by the Canadian Parliament (and thus lacking a "Royal Charter").
similarly, the Canadian Army was formed piecemeal over time, with some units being created by the crown directly (and thus having a "Royal Charter"), and some created by the Canadian Parliament (and thus lacking a "Royal Charter").
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The 24th and a Half Century
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About time, many have been calling for this for a while. Sadly it has come too late for a good friend of mine who retired last year. One question remains, will they revert back to traditional RCAF ranks?
Managed to get one over a Canadian Air Force Colonel - rang him this morning to tell him the good news, which he hadn't heard. He rang me back to advise that they (the RCAF) will be retaining the Purple ranks, but his Army WO (Arty) - a Francophone Quebecois of thie highest order - was absolutely fuming and issuing spit lecked Gaullist expletives!
excellent result!
excellent result!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: X:0 Y:0 Z:0 (relative to myself obviously)
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, why no RCA? Admittedly they were the Canadian Army previously, but this is a, as some have said, "reinvention of the wheel"! What protocol dictates no 'Royal' for the Army?
Royal Regiment of Canadian Artillery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
They also used to produce gramophone records, which are apparently an old kind of mp3.
RCA Records - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does the 'Royal' bit have any financial impact on Pension T&C's if someone was to transfer to the RCAF?
I know a number of guys who would consider a move, but would have to spend circa $C190,000 to buy back a pension equivalent to that which they would be leaving.
I know a number of guys who would consider a move, but would have to spend circa $C190,000 to buy back a pension equivalent to that which they would be leaving.
New Model Army
So, why no RCA? Admittedly they were the Canadian Army previously, but this is a, as some have said, "reinvention of the wheel"! What protocol dictates no 'Royal' for the Army?
They were disbanded after the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, but some of the names stuck: Coldstream Guards for one.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is Canada being opportunist - after the Royal Visit perhaps? They should not have Royal in their title unless they revert back to having the Union Flag in their own! I do hate it when people sit on the fence!
Last edited by ghostnav; 17th Aug 2011 at 04:56.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sunny (or Rainy) Somerset, England
Posts: 2,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The current version of the Canadian flag stems from 1965, and the RCAF, RCN and CA were amalgamated into the Canadian Armed Forces in 1968.
It would seem logical to me that they could revert to their old names under the flag that was current and official at the time they amalgamated.
It would seem logical to me that they could revert to their old names under the flag that was current and official at the time they amalgamated.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Royal Navy and Royal Air Force were created directly by the monarch through a Royal Charter as a single entity.
I think this is also why an RN officer never formally "retires" as such, he or she is placed on the retired list of officers but retain the entitlement to placing "Royal Navy" as a post nom, whereas the RAF have to put RAF(Retd).
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does the RN have a Royal Charter? I am not sure it does. The RN is quite different to the RAF in its formation and terms of service. In the RN no contract is signed by new officers (not sure about the ratings) nor an oath of allegiance given. Acceptance of the "Queen's Shilling" i.e. pay, is deemed sufficient enough "contract". Whereas in the RAF I think both a contract is signed and an oath given.
I think this is also why an RN officer never formally "retires" as such, he or she is placed on the retired list of officers but retain the entitlement to placing "Royal Navy" as a post nom, whereas the RAF have to put RAF(Retd).
I think this is also why an RN officer never formally "retires" as such, he or she is placed on the retired list of officers but retain the entitlement to placing "Royal Navy" as a post nom, whereas the RAF have to put RAF(Retd).
The use of RAF(retd) has become prevelant though it is, technically, incorrect. (Debretts Correct Form refers). RAF officers of flt lt and above having served for 3 years on the active list retain the ability to use their military rank on retirement (QR(RAF)3002(1)).
Last edited by Climebear; 17th Aug 2011 at 13:35.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climbear,
Thanks for the info. I have been fed duff gen by an RAF buddy who said that he "signed on the dotted line" on arrival at Cranwell and swore allegiance to HMQ (but perhaps it was just "what the f.. am I doing here")
Thanks for the info. I have been fed duff gen by an RAF buddy who said that he "signed on the dotted line" on arrival at Cranwell and swore allegiance to HMQ (but perhaps it was just "what the f.. am I doing here")
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF officers and airmen do swear an oath of allegience.
For even more trivia, the Air Force (Constitution) Act 1917 gave the Sovereign the legal basis for forming the Royal Air Force.
1 Raising and number of Air Force.
For even more trivia, the Air Force (Constitution) Act 1917 gave the Sovereign the legal basis for forming the Royal Air Force.
Part I
Establishment of Air Force
Establishment of Air Force
1 Raising and number of Air Force.
It shall be lawful for His Majesty to raise and maintain a force, to be called the Air Force, consisting of such number of officers, warrant officers, non-commissioned officers, and men as may from time to time be provided by Parliament.