Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK Military news

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK Military news

Old 2nd Aug 2011, 19:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK Military news

I have recently returned to live in the Uk for family reasons. Tonight as usual I watched a number of news stations. At no point was anything broadcast that covered the fact that the UK was involved in two maybe three wars.

The good news was that a British serviceman hadn't been killed. The weird thing was that there was no coverage of what is going on. Orwellian is something that comes to mind.

Would be interested to hear the views of ppruners.

Just in case of queries, I am ex military.
4Greens is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 19:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a follower of the news I have certainly noticed a slant towards reporting casualties rather than progress or the achievement of stated objectives.

The joint Anglo/French action in Libya has fallen off the news bulletins, probably because there is a sense of failure. It has been going on since March with no tangible result, despite the expenditure of an amount that would probably have built a few hospitals or prisons.
A2QFI is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 19:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's because neither theatre is creating news at the moment, both are in a routine phase. However, there is plenty on the diplomatic/government front from both countries. Hague talking about Libya, Def sec on his recent visit to Afgh.

The news is about Syria, which is making the news at the moment!
Pheasant is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 19:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The joint Anglo/French action in Libya has fallen off the news bulletins, probably because there is a sense of failure. It has been going on since March with no tangible result, despite the expenditure of an amount that would probably have built a few hospitals or prisons.
Well apart from averting a purging/massacre/word of your choice. Yep, completely pointless.
Backwards PLT is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 20:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 47
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the UK populace are weary of the afghan, iraq and libya conflicts as they are all based on political lies. Only a few numpties actually believe what the political 'leaders' have told them. I think even the military don't actually know why they're involved too.

Most people are only interested in real problems, not those created by the bellers in 'govern'ment.
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 20:47
  #6 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 81
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember thinking at the start of the Afghan campaign that the Russians couldn't sort it with both their arms free, how can we sort it with one arm being tied behind our backs by the rules of engagement and the huggies watching every move.
green granite is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 21:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,500
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
It's a bit like buying an expensive car that you cannot afford and not telling your wife.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 21:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well apart from averting a purging/massacre/word of your choice. Yep, completely pointless.
If that was the issue, shouldn't we be bombing the sh!t out of Assad?
erm......

sw
Safeware is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2011, 22:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,710
Received 2,708 Likes on 1,148 Posts
Reducing the news content could be so as to sweeten the path to announcing the redundancies, it does not look good saying you are chopping peeps when the news is full of them on active service fighting does it..

NutLoose is online now  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 07:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from the Guardian

"Libya is not a dependency of the United Kingdom. It was and is no threat to Britain or its people, and the consequent rise in the price of oil is not in Britain's interest. Libya is in the grip of a wretched civil war that Britain might have relieved with aid, but not bombers. It is a mistake. But who will say so?

Parliament, silent and feeble over interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, has spent three weeks beating its chest over the Murdoch press, even summoning the prime minister back from abroad to answer for his actions. It never summoned him over Libya, where every night people die. Parliament fiddles while Libya burns."

So - what have we achieved? Where will our next ill-judged, under equipped, under funded intervention be?
A2QFI is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 07:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A2QFI

Perhaps we should ask the Population of Lockerbie for their opinion?
cazatou is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 07:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: home: United Kingdom
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
caz,

The population of Lockerbie live in the country that allowed the individual found guilty of the bombing of PanAm 103 to return home. If they wanted to speak, perhaps they should have raised their voices earlier.

Duncs
Duncan D'Sorderlee is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 08:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duncs

I always viewed the decision to return the perpetrator of the atrocity to his homeland as a purely political move by the Leader of the SNP to demonstrate the power he had obtained.
cazatou is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 08:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In 1988 there was no insurrection in Libya which UK could have supported, legally or morally, SFAIK.
A2QFI is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 08:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cloud9
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In January 2006, when 3,300 British troops were committed to Afghanistan, the then Secretary of State for Defence, John Reid, claimed that British troops would accomplish their mission & leave "without a single shot being fired".

By 2008, 4,000,000 rounds of ammunition had been expended by British armed forces in Afghanistan.

The West will leave Afghanistan in exactly the same way that the Soviet empire did; having achieved nothing, except the squandering of young lives & much treasure. Afghanistan will revert to its' centuries-old tribal fiefdoms, ungovernable in nature; I am reminded of George Carew, the captain of the Tudor warship, Mary Rose, sallying forth to engage the French in the Solent. His uncle, Gawen Carew, sailed close by & hailed him, enquiring after his situation; George replied "I have the sort of knaves I cannot rule"...............

We are now treated to the demeaning spectacle of a politically-emasculated NATO dithering over Libya, due to a lack of fortitude in Western capitals. Perhaps we need to discuss a few things before our Syrian adventure?

Thank heavens we out-spent the Soviets before they came boiling over the Inner German Border............

HB
Halton Brat is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 08:50
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Halton Brat
In January 2006, when 3,300 British troops were committed to Afghanistan, the then Secretary of State for Defence, John Reid, claimed that British troops would accomplish their mission & leave "without a single shot being fired"...
I heard John Reid's words and he actually said he hoped that British troops would be able to leave Afghanistan without a single shot being fired. At the time, so did I.

Naive perhaps but whatever you think about the man and his government, don't follow the sheep in attempting to re-write history.
FODPlod is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 09:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cloud9
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find a multitude of quotations in respect of what John (now Baron) Reid said in this context; however, the inferrance remains the same - a soothing yet condescending balm for a (rightly) concerned British public, no doubt clung to eagerly by the mothers of young squaddies, embarking on yet another US-led adventure, to the greater glory of the Bush/Blair partnership.

Mr Reid susequently takes a 50kGBP/yr 'consultancy' position with security firm G4S, which is then awarded a multi-million pound MOD contract in Afghanistan. This is a complete co-incidence.

Tony Blair: "This is no time for soundbites, but I feel the hand of history on my shoulder".

Really.

HB
Halton Brat is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 09:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South of Spain.
Age: 64
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The population of Lockerbie live in the country that allowed the individual found guilty of the bombing of PanAm 103 to return home. If they wanted to speak, perhaps they should have raised their voices earlier.
They did speak. At the last general election and in 2005 the SNP trailed in 4th with 10.8% and 9.1% of the vote respectively. In the last Scottish elections when the SNP trashed the other parties they came third in the constituency that Lockerbie sits in.
McGoonagall is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 09:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York
Posts: 517
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a soothing yet condescending balm for a (rightly) concerned British public, no doubt clung to eagerly by the mothers of young squaddies, embarking on yet another US-led adventure, to the greater glory of the Bush/Blair partnership.
Except that the 2001 invasion of Afg was the first UK/US joint op of 'that' ilk, that it came some 2 years before the Iraq campaign and just about a year after Bush had actually come to power after his inauguration in Jan 2001.
muppetofthenorth is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 10:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cloud9
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mup

I was not seeking to establish a chronological time-line by the use of the words "yet another"; I was alluding to what I consider to be the on-going puppy-dog politics of the Bush/Blair era.

HB
Halton Brat is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.