Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lost Navy SEALS Helo.....Wot really happened??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lost Navy SEALS Helo.....Wot really happened??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2011, 09:37
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
baechbunny

I'm pretty sure that "settling with power" is what the US calls vortex ring.
What you are talking about there is recirculation, something totally different, and I have to say not what I reckon is likely in this scenario.
Tourist is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:48
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Overlooking the beach, NZ
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have got my tin foil hat on for this thread. It has four pages but no matter what I click (even manually putting the URL for page four in) I get sent to page 3! Obviously some super secret info on page 4 the 'THEY' don't want us to know....

... or the forum code is a bit stuffed.
bakseetblatherer is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:51
  #63 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: so far south of blighty its untrue!!!!!
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah me too..its a conspiracy!!!

Ps Could it have blown a SEAL???!!!

They can't touch you for that!! I'll get my jacket
back end o' the bus is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 10:17
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?rel=0" frameborder="0" gesture="media" allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen>
forget is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 15:39
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tourist

Been a while since I was in that arena, but yes, vortex ring is the other term I couldn't remember. I thought though that "recirculation" as you call it would be the same thing, causes such as steep descent, downwind approach, etc etc.
Recovery, nose down a little, try to run forward out of it, Oh sh... there's a wall in front of me! Very feasible.
Of course, as always, there's other things that could have the same end result.
beachbunny is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 16:02
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I have got my tin foil hat on for this thread. It has four pages but no matter what I click (even manually putting the URL for page four in) I get sent to page 3! Obviously some super secret info on page 4 the 'THEY' don't want us to know....

... or the forum code is a bit stuffed."

It happens on quite a few threads when it gets to the max number of posts, it seems to create the net page even though nothing has been posted on it.


Re SF pushing the boundaries, it is all a calculated risk / reward and to an outsider it appears dangerous but because SF tend to have been there or close to it before, they are better at making risky judgement calls.
500N is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 17:59
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odiham
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a Stealth Hawk......

Why the crash? Overcooked the approach, too high nose up and stuck the tail in the wall. They have done it before and will do it again. Most of the time the tail doesn't come off though!

That said, awesome bunch of blokes, balls the size of footballs (British not American) and a job well done. Who cares about one little heli, they have hundreds.......

wokkamate is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 19:10
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,194
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Who cares about one little heli, they have hundreds.......

Well, if it is the alleged super secret stealth Black Hawk, they don't have hundreds ... losing one would be quite bothersome to the Special Ops Command.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 19:11
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bearing in mind Pakistan has had 20 BN in U.S aid since 2001 and currently wants more I think its a pretty safe bet that the remains of this machine is back in U.S hands already.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 19:39
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,194
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
I hope you are right, but given the public discomfort that Pakistani government has expressed over this raid into their territory, one cannot be too sure.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th May 2011, 00:15
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ireland
Age: 53
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blade strike
tail strike
wires
powerloss due to recirculation
powerloss due to temp, altitude and load
uneven surface
blade damage due to recirculation (sucking thru blades in confined area)
error during roping
hard landing
nerves
shot down

considering this was the SOAR and SealTeam6 who do nothing else but this type of thing only last option sounds reasonable.

the rest i can not imagine having been overlooked by these kinda guys during the planning stage. further they had ample opportunity to practise this setup under the exact same conditions at the replica they build for exactly this purpose.

what makes most sense thru is that this poor helicopter was never intended to get outa there in the first place. leaves a nice unmistakable footprint and NO doubt as who or what.

imagine what the silly press and folks would make out of this without the dead heli at that site.

this was a great job done (finally) and well planned (down to the dealing with the press and the mob)

RIP helicopter.
blkhwk_64 is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 10:28
  #72 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,697
Received 50 Likes on 24 Posts
...... or in the words of the SH Songbook ........
...and the Navy's on the fence in the morning!"
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 11:36
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the explosives intended to destroy the helicopter after the crash went off a bit early?

Or, as mentioned above, it was always intended to be a sacrificial one-way asset - i'd say that OBL was worth it to the US.
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 12:22
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
It wouldn't been the first SF raid where a cab was "sacrificed". The Son Tay raid envisaged sacrificing the first cab in as the LS was too small for it - it was deemed more important to get the assault team close to the objective. I believe that Eagle Claw would have struggled to bring all the helos back too.

However, my bet is still tail strike on the compound wall.....
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 18:29
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tail rotor strike on the compound wall as he overcooked it on the way in.

Some of you may recall the two tailwheel holes in the wriggly tin wall at Dungannon. OC 72 and STANO. Libellous in this day and age, but I was FLANG (Flight Lieutenants Against Non-Graduates) as opposed to FOLA, a bunch of virgins who couldn't read or write. Or fly very well come to think of it. Hat on.

Looks to me like he left the tail rotor on the outside of the compound while he (or she, obviously) enjoyed a relatively short and low speed crash to where the fun was. Epic entrance.

I've never heard a super stealthy helicopter, especially when there's four of you and two of you are Chinooks and it's in the wee small hours.
Monty77 is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 18:45
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Monty,
"I've never heard a super stealthy helicopter"

That's the whole point! There could be one outside now.........
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 19:35
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: at home
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My money is on vortex ring or tailstrike. Recirc should be taken into consideration in the planning. If it has not been considered, that is baguette et buerre... Recirc should not necessarily be an issue when hovering higher above the wall whilst roping.
high spirits is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 21:46
  #78 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the reports here in Australia has suggested he suffered mechanical problems, possibly caused by gunfire from the roof, with the resultant landing being the best he could hope for, rather than any pilot error.
parabellum is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 22:13
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, people do just **** up. Even super special sf aircrew screw up just as often as everybody else because they are doing things closer to the limits than everybody else.
Chances are it was a combination of the possibilities, mixed with a bit of miscalculation and nerves thrown in. Doesn't matter how many sf missions you have done, invading a sovereign country to take down public enemy no1 and become famous (within the comunity) is goiing to cause some jitters.
Tourist is offline  
Old 8th May 2011, 22:30
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arrrrrrrgh
Age: 55
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, people do just **** up
Oh come on tourist, this is pprune. Everybody has to analyse, criticise and say how much better they could have carried out the operation. We are only on page 4 of this thread. It needs to go on for at least another 6 pages.
Really annoyed is offline  


Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.