LIBYA (Merged) Use this thread ONLY
Big E
The NFZ will happen, the USS Enterprise is returning back through the Suez canal. With the proximity of friendly airfields, the carrier is hardly needed, just the determination and FJ.
Trim Stab,
Have you not been watching the news? It doesn't make any difference if it is minor misuse - it is still misuse. Note that in my post it stated opposition. That opposition is made up of defecting Libyan forces personnel and civilians.
The point is that the majority of the International Community think that Gadaffi's position is untenable and that to prevent further blood shed he should go. The whole point of the NFZ would be to take away his capability to inflict mass casualties and make it clear that his regime is over. Even discussion and threat of military action could possibly influence Gadaffi to realise that the game is up? No doubt the pressure of military action is also being put on Gadaffi via the remaining diplomatic channels.
The situation is confused at the moment due to the ongoing evacuation of foreign nationals. Any direct military action or enforcement at this time is risky until the evacuation process is complete. With the evacuation of foreign nationals complete the easiest option, even by a Coalition of the willing, is to take Gadaffi's toys away from him. It wouldn't take much to JDAM/Paveway loyalist airfields and plink the remaining air force inventory.
Once the evacuation of foreign nationals is complete I can see things developing. Gaddafi has been on TV interview last night ranting about Al Qaeda being the opposition. In order to prevent Gadaffi from taking a last stand I can see a Coalition involved in taking his air force out with Loyalist runways destroyed and aircraft plinked. It is a lot easier than simply establishing a No Fly Zone on its own.
The WMD issue appears to be clear. After seeing what was about to happen to Saddam, Gadaffi back in 2003 came clean to the west about its WMD programme. Inspectors were allowed in and destruction was implemented by UN inspectors during 2004.
IAEA Praises Libya for Disarmament Efforts | Arms Control Association
At the same time, international efforts to dismantle Libya’s chemical weapons program are progressing. On March 19, inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)—the organization that verifies compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention—verified Tripoli’s March 5 initial chemical weapons declaration. According to the OPCW, Libya declared “approximately 23 metric tonnes of mustard gas, 1,300 metric tonnes of precursor chemicals, …[an] inactivated chemical weapons production facility, …[and] two chemical weapons storage facilities.”
Between Feb. 27 and March 3, the OPCW also “verified… the complete destruction” of more than 3,500 unfilled bombs “designed to disperse chemical warfare agent,” according to organization press releases. The OPCW stated March 22 that it intends to verify Libya’s destruction of the remaining chemical agents.
IAEA Inspections in Libya Making Progress
BBC NEWS | Africa | 'No reward' for non-nuclear Libya
TJ
Have you not been watching the news? It doesn't make any difference if it is minor misuse - it is still misuse. Note that in my post it stated opposition. That opposition is made up of defecting Libyan forces personnel and civilians.
The point is that the majority of the International Community think that Gadaffi's position is untenable and that to prevent further blood shed he should go. The whole point of the NFZ would be to take away his capability to inflict mass casualties and make it clear that his regime is over. Even discussion and threat of military action could possibly influence Gadaffi to realise that the game is up? No doubt the pressure of military action is also being put on Gadaffi via the remaining diplomatic channels.
The situation is confused at the moment due to the ongoing evacuation of foreign nationals. Any direct military action or enforcement at this time is risky until the evacuation process is complete. With the evacuation of foreign nationals complete the easiest option, even by a Coalition of the willing, is to take Gadaffi's toys away from him. It wouldn't take much to JDAM/Paveway loyalist airfields and plink the remaining air force inventory.
Once the evacuation of foreign nationals is complete I can see things developing. Gaddafi has been on TV interview last night ranting about Al Qaeda being the opposition. In order to prevent Gadaffi from taking a last stand I can see a Coalition involved in taking his air force out with Loyalist runways destroyed and aircraft plinked. It is a lot easier than simply establishing a No Fly Zone on its own.
The WMD issue appears to be clear. After seeing what was about to happen to Saddam, Gadaffi back in 2003 came clean to the west about its WMD programme. Inspectors were allowed in and destruction was implemented by UN inspectors during 2004.
IAEA Praises Libya for Disarmament Efforts | Arms Control Association
At the same time, international efforts to dismantle Libya’s chemical weapons program are progressing. On March 19, inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)—the organization that verifies compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention—verified Tripoli’s March 5 initial chemical weapons declaration. According to the OPCW, Libya declared “approximately 23 metric tonnes of mustard gas, 1,300 metric tonnes of precursor chemicals, …[an] inactivated chemical weapons production facility, …[and] two chemical weapons storage facilities.”
Between Feb. 27 and March 3, the OPCW also “verified… the complete destruction” of more than 3,500 unfilled bombs “designed to disperse chemical warfare agent,” according to organization press releases. The OPCW stated March 22 that it intends to verify Libya’s destruction of the remaining chemical agents.
IAEA Inspections in Libya Making Progress
BBC NEWS | Africa | 'No reward' for non-nuclear Libya
TJ
Last edited by TEEEJ; 1st Mar 2011 at 02:10.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh My Gawd,
I hadn't appreciated Trim Stab was infected this thread aswell as the 'Congrats Herc' thread whereas he's p1ssed off the RAF are poaching his salary.
Come on Trim Stab, despite your operator being able to operate into disused airstrips how might your operator, B737, A320 or whatever, serve to enforce a NFZ?
You have to be desperately short of money because you're off your head mate!
I hadn't appreciated Trim Stab was infected this thread aswell as the 'Congrats Herc' thread whereas he's p1ssed off the RAF are poaching his salary.
Come on Trim Stab, despite your operator being able to operate into disused airstrips how might your operator, B737, A320 or whatever, serve to enforce a NFZ?
You have to be desperately short of money because you're off your head mate!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like any intervention will escalate beyond a NFZ. I think some ground forces might be needed.
The US has a carrier and an amphib group moving to the area.
FT.com / Middle East & North Africa - West weighs military measures
The US has a carrier and an amphib group moving to the area.
FT.com / Middle East & North Africa - West weighs military measures
West weighs military measures
By Daniel Dombey in Washington and Peter Spiegel in Brussels
Published: February 25 2011 19:10 | Last updated: February 25 2011 19:10
... Since rebel forces already control much of the coast and border regions, steps to safeguard ports, airports and safe zones could serve to protect them against Col Gaddafi’s forces.
... The White House has added it is looking at the “feasibility” of measures such as a no-fly zone. However, some officials note such a step could bring limited benefits. Libya’s air force is in poor condition, and much of it is in areas held by rebels. Two pilots defected to Malta this week rather than bomb civilians. By contrast, Col Gaddafi’s push to quash the rebellion largely depends on militias, troops commanded by his family members, and foreign mercenaries.
... He added that “Nato as such has no plans to intervene” and that any military action “should be based on a clear UN mandate”. Such a mandate would be hard to achieve, given China’s resistance at the UN Security Council to interventionist steps.
By Daniel Dombey in Washington and Peter Spiegel in Brussels
Published: February 25 2011 19:10 | Last updated: February 25 2011 19:10
... Since rebel forces already control much of the coast and border regions, steps to safeguard ports, airports and safe zones could serve to protect them against Col Gaddafi’s forces.
... The White House has added it is looking at the “feasibility” of measures such as a no-fly zone. However, some officials note such a step could bring limited benefits. Libya’s air force is in poor condition, and much of it is in areas held by rebels. Two pilots defected to Malta this week rather than bomb civilians. By contrast, Col Gaddafi’s push to quash the rebellion largely depends on militias, troops commanded by his family members, and foreign mercenaries.
... He added that “Nato as such has no plans to intervene” and that any military action “should be based on a clear UN mandate”. Such a mandate would be hard to achieve, given China’s resistance at the UN Security Council to interventionist steps.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Goodwood, Sussex, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To Libya We Go
C'mon lads, saddle up!
Reports in that Brit Tornados and Typhoons will be deployed ex-Cyprus although I can't see why we couldn't use one of the southern Italian bases or even the US facility in Malta.
What a scumbag and what a relief it will be if he goes - I don't think Libyans even know what liberty feels like!
Good fighting boys.
Earl
Reports in that Brit Tornados and Typhoons will be deployed ex-Cyprus although I can't see why we couldn't use one of the southern Italian bases or even the US facility in Malta.
What a scumbag and what a relief it will be if he goes - I don't think Libyans even know what liberty feels like!
Good fighting boys.
Earl
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Swimmin' with bowlegged women
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 0497
I think some ground forces might be needed.
Again I think the experiences from the Balkans and Iraq should be considered if a similar effort is to be made in Libya. I realise that an effectively enforced NFZ might be a lot better than no action at all, but can we settle with a limited effect against hostile ground forces doing a lot more damage than the air force?
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There aren't so many military air bases in Libya, I understand Benghazi/Benina airfield has already been put out of action, and watching TV today they're getting well organised in Benghazi recruiting and training up a military force to take the madman and his forces on.
If one thinks about it they didn't require international help when the Lockerbie bomber returned to Libya, they were happy enough to rub our faces in it then, some are asking for uinternational help now but it seems they're also preparing to sort the madman out for themselves.
I did have to smile though, there's a significant munitions stockpile near Ajdabiya, Gaddafi keeps sending the air force across to bomb it and the crews keep missing the target ..... One does have to ask how significant a NFZ might be as it seems the air force aren't taking their orders too seriously anyway?
If one thinks about it they didn't require international help when the Lockerbie bomber returned to Libya, they were happy enough to rub our faces in it then, some are asking for uinternational help now but it seems they're also preparing to sort the madman out for themselves.
I did have to smile though, there's a significant munitions stockpile near Ajdabiya, Gaddafi keeps sending the air force across to bomb it and the crews keep missing the target ..... One does have to ask how significant a NFZ might be as it seems the air force aren't taking their orders too seriously anyway?
Trim Stab
Plenty of "non article 5" NATO action in the past (and present in Afghanistan), which is why they award stuff like this:
Who knows, if it is a NATO op, I might be able to wear this one this time around!
The B Word
Plenty of "non article 5" NATO action in the past (and present in Afghanistan), which is why they award stuff like this:
Who knows, if it is a NATO op, I might be able to wear this one this time around!
The B Word
Guest
Posts: n/a
Glad Rag. Agree.
To the rest:
Never mind that there might be new and interesting opportunities to bomb people.
Just remember: These are events in a Foreign Country. The People of the Country will sort it out for themselves, or live with the consequences.
I repeat, Libya is a FOREIGN country, you know, like Afghanistan and Iraq.
The UK has sweet ZERO to do here.
Move along............FFS!
To the rest:
Never mind that there might be new and interesting opportunities to bomb people.
Just remember: These are events in a Foreign Country. The People of the Country will sort it out for themselves, or live with the consequences.
I repeat, Libya is a FOREIGN country, you know, like Afghanistan and Iraq.
The UK has sweet ZERO to do here.
Move along............FFS!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never mind the logistics of where a NFZ might be operated from, what about the fact the RAF top brass have been saying for sometime now that they've only just enough Typhoons to cover UK northern and southern QRA duties and Falklands air defence, so can't deploy Typhoon in the close air support role in Afghanistan (assuming it's ready for the role), let alone supporting a NFZ...
Headmaster Cameron states that a NFZ would be for humanitarian reasons. So why did his heroine The Iron Lady not adopt the same stance over the likes of Mugabe, etc, etc? The hypocrisy and double-standards adpoted by our minority elected, inexperienced and point-scoring politicians is unbelievable if it weren't so true.
Does the PM, the Chief of the Air Staff, or their 'advisors' really know what they're doing?
Headmaster Cameron states that a NFZ would be for humanitarian reasons. So why did his heroine The Iron Lady not adopt the same stance over the likes of Mugabe, etc, etc? The hypocrisy and double-standards adpoted by our minority elected, inexperienced and point-scoring politicians is unbelievable if it weren't so true.
Does the PM, the Chief of the Air Staff, or their 'advisors' really know what they're doing?
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 77
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two US warships, the USS Kearsarge and USS Ponce, enter the Suez Canal en route for the Mediterranean, after orders from Defence Secretary Robert Gates that they should move closer to Libya
Originally Posted by TSR2Eeagle
Not forgetting the 175 aircraft permanently assigned to the US Navy's Sixth Fleet in the Med, which would make any deployment by the RAF to enforce a NFZ somewhat insiginificant...
We do also offer certain niche capabilities and reputations, mind you.
is there really a USS Ponce?
The mind boggles ...... is it a floating bath and brothel unit, or do we have a different usage?
Much as faggots?
Baflled of Baston
The mind boggles ...... is it a floating bath and brothel unit, or do we have a different usage?
Much as faggots?
Baflled of Baston
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The USN has an airbase, NAS Sigonella roughly 300nm from Tripoli and 400nm from Benghazi. (I see parked C-17s, C-135 tankers and P3 Orions: NAS Sigonella- Google Maps)
Pentagon thoughts: (looks like bombs have to be dropped for a NFZ to done properly)
Pentagon hesitant on no-fly zone over Libya - Wash Post
Pentagon thoughts: (looks like bombs have to be dropped for a NFZ to done properly)
Pentagon hesitant on no-fly zone over Libya - Wash Post
.... [Gates] "We also have to think about frankly the use of the U.S. military in another country in the Middle East," he told reporters at a news conference. "So we are sensitive about all these things."
.... Gen. James N. Mattis, the head of U.S. Central Command, told a Senate panel that it would be necessary to preemptively attack Libyan air-defense batteries and installations to ensure that they could not shoot down U.S. or NATO planes.
[full quote] “My military opinion is, sir, it would be challenging. You would have to remove the air defense capability, in order to establish the no-fly zone. So it — no illusions here, it would be a military operation. It wouldn’t simply be telling people not to fly airplanes."
Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed Mattis's warning about preemptive strikes on Libyan targets. ...
.... Gen. James N. Mattis, the head of U.S. Central Command, told a Senate panel that it would be necessary to preemptively attack Libyan air-defense batteries and installations to ensure that they could not shoot down U.S. or NATO planes.
[full quote] “My military opinion is, sir, it would be challenging. You would have to remove the air defense capability, in order to establish the no-fly zone. So it — no illusions here, it would be a military operation. It wouldn’t simply be telling people not to fly airplanes."
Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed Mattis's warning about preemptive strikes on Libyan targets. ...
Last edited by 0497; 2nd Mar 2011 at 12:53.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(google news is great)
Cameron retreats from Libya no-fly plan after US shows caution | World news | guardian.co.uk
Cameron retreats from Libya no-fly plan after US shows caution | World news | guardian.co.uk
Cameron retreats from Libya no-fly plan after US shows caution
Wednesday 2 March 2011
Britain has backtracked from its belligerent military stance over Libya after the Obama administration publicly distanced itself from David Cameron's suggestion that Nato should establish a no-fly zone over the country and that rebel forces should be armed.
As senior British military sources expressed concern that Downing Street appeared to be overlooking the dangers of being sucked into a long and potentially dangerous operation, the prime minister said Britain would go no further than contacting the rebel forces at this stage.
....
Wednesday 2 March 2011
Britain has backtracked from its belligerent military stance over Libya after the Obama administration publicly distanced itself from David Cameron's suggestion that Nato should establish a no-fly zone over the country and that rebel forces should be armed.
As senior British military sources expressed concern that Downing Street appeared to be overlooking the dangers of being sucked into a long and potentially dangerous operation, the prime minister said Britain would go no further than contacting the rebel forces at this stage.
....
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Between Oxon and somewhere else
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe we should establish a NFZ over Charlie Sheen too...
Charlie Sheen v Muammar Gaddafi: whose line is it anyway? | World news | guardian.co.uk
Charlie Sheen v Muammar Gaddafi: whose line is it anyway? | World news | guardian.co.uk