Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

SDSR:- A Naval 'Victory'.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

SDSR:- A Naval 'Victory'.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2011, 21:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SDSR:- A Naval 'Victory'.

HMS Victory has been awarded a £20 million grant from the MoD for restoration work over the next decade. 400 Jobs are secured.

Notwithstanding the heritage involved which should be preserved, you have to question the argument of MoD money versus a Trust or indeed National Lottery or English Heritage grant. The 400 jobs will all be civilian jobs associated with a 'tourist attraction' that could have benefited from Management in the civil sector or corporate sponsorship. ....and no I am not suggesting Victory adorned with a Red Bull livery!

The RAF Museums(s) and the FAA Museum, & Museum of Army Flying are all ran as profiterable companies, why not the historic ships?
Spot 4 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 21:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HMS Victory

It's the MoD ensuring we have a new flag ship to lead the next task force now Ark Royal's gone!
Topsy Turvey is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 23:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you chop the masts down it would make a great 'aircraftless carrier'
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 01:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 594
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
With whats gone on recently i am at a loss as to why these things get money thrown at them, I include the reds in this waste of money as well. Loss of jobs and hardware in the military to keep tourists happy beggars belief. If I was still in the UK I would be looking on how to get out that is for sure.
fergineer is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 02:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,820 Likes on 1,202 Posts
It's green, built from sustainable resources, has a Low IR Signature and stealthy wood design, it is the way Fwd, wonder why we don't build the new carriers out of the stuff..........


I wonder if they will hide this behind screens from the publics gaze AKA Nimrod...
NutLoose is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 09:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well deserved I'd say.

All this nonsense about funding for the RAF Museum etc is completely ignoring the fact that the BBMF is fully funded through the Defence budget. If the Government can pay for a living memorial for the only significant RAF contribution to the defence of this country, then surely it can fund such a magnificent and historic memorial such as the wonderful HMS Victory!
Mick Strigg is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 10:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: listening to the sound of aviation
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The National Museum of the Royal Air Force is funded from MoD. Their last year accounts show £7,367,000 of public money. Similar arrangement exist for the National Army Museum [£5,514,371] and the National Museum of the Royal Navy [£3m approx on last figs avail on web]. It looks like the public purse pays approx 70% of the running of these museums, in any case.

Last edited by Dockers; 26th Jan 2011 at 13:44.
Dockers is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 10:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
I have the depressing feeling that if the news was that the MOD was cutting £20m funding, then the board would be full of people condemming the MODS disgraceful attitude to our national heritage...
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 11:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kettering
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The day this nation ceases to fund the upkeep of HMS Victory will no doubt be the same day that an Islamic flag flies over Buck House.
LookingNorth is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 11:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northwest
Age: 64
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had heard that they were proposing a transfer of the civilian staff to a trust from April 2011; has this been dropped?

Last edited by EGGP; 26th Jan 2011 at 11:49. Reason: clarification
EGGP is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2011, 12:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Sailor Beware......

........... In 1985, during a bit of refurbishment, the headquarters at Brampton burnt down. The Cutty Sark was gutted by a fire a few years ago and the supply squadron at Lossiemouth was also damaged by fire. The hangar at Finningley went up in smoke (together with several Varsitys).

I think I'd be very careful about having major works done on Victory without a few more fire extinguishers.

O-D
Old-Duffer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.