Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Merry Christmas From China

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Merry Christmas From China

Old 31st Dec 2010, 20:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comparison with J-10. It would appear that the J-20 is around the length of an Su-27?



TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 21:28
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MSP
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's some cockpit photos here: Welcome to China Defense.com
TabulaRasa is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 08:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: hong kong
Age: 49
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations PRC!

It looks awesome, even if its full capabilities may not be understood yet.

A well managed economy affords the developments of sexy equipment and this is a lesson to our politicians and bean-counters.

Best,

SSS
subsonicsubic is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 09:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Funny innit. When 'they' build a new 'plane its going to be ace and cause all sorts of mither but if we build a new 'plane the radar won't work the thing hasn't enough fuel, made of the wrong materials by cheap sub contractors, missiles fly backwards, bombs aren't smart, can't carry enough of anything too many crew, can't land on a carrier, too heavy, lacks commonality, can't communicate, made of peas, underpowered, not enough cup holders, smells of wee....
Load Toad is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2011, 10:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
LT, I wouldn't be too worried, half the kids christmas presents have broken already, and they were made in China.
On the flipside, at least they have a large manufacturing base and economy of scale, so they are able to do this sort of thing. I doubt we'd be able to produce anything more than a UCAV (or whatever they are called this month) in the future. Looks a little like the old Mig below mated with an F-23.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2011, 16:35
  #26 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
Ares: Every Day, It's a-Getting Closer



The most recent imagery from Chengdu shows further progress toward first flight, with the nosewheel off the ground. At the same time, Chinese defense bloggers have pulled up an image of an experimental simulator cockpit that emerged a couple of years ago:



The forward view of the aircraft on the left-hand display is much too like the J-20 to be the product of coincidence.

Other Chinese enthusiasts have been playing with CGI. It is hard to vouch for their accuracy, but it's visually impressive:



Finally, Air Power Australia has released an updated assessment of the J-20, with some interesting thoughts on timing, numbers and roles and missions, and Feng at Information Dissemination has some good observations.
ORAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2011, 22:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What? Air Power Australia thinks the J-20 is a ripper and that the F-35 should be cancelled???

Holy crap, who could've predicted that? May as well start learning Mandarin now!
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2011, 22:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Dui, hen hao!
Load Toad is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 06:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finally, Air Power Australia has released an updated assessment of the J-20, with some interesting thoughts on timing, numbers and roles and missions,
Wild-@ssed guesses, pure imaginings, and desperate exaggerations designed to support their "the RAAF must buy F-22 only & completely rebuild the F-111" agenda.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 12:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a plan. We could have TSR2's
tonker is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 18:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2011, 14:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JF said;
"What you can assess from such a picture tends to depend on your education, training, experience, knowledge of various aircraft design features "

Come on John, don't leave us hanging...
Care to share your impression?
Smoketoomuch is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2011, 14:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either landing or high speed taxi with chute deployment at Chengdu?





TJ

Last edited by TEEEJ; 5th Jan 2011 at 15:07.
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2011, 14:58
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bu dui hen hao qing yond cesuo zaoju zaii jain dong le dong bu dong
Hey!

That's my mobile 'phone ring tone!
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2011, 16:06
  #35 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smoketoomuch

Surely not , you cant see much from the picture.
I was merely making the general case following the quote above.

Not suggesting that I had any such background.

In actual fact there have been several links to analysis that I find no reason to argue with.

Something that Anatoly Kvotchur said to me one day was "the bigger the aircraft the easier it is to meet the spec" Wise words but they do ignore visual signature and cost.

As to

Wild-@ssed guesses, pure imaginings, and desperate exaggerations designed to support their "the RAAF must buy F-22 only & completely rebuild the F-111" agenda.
I would have thought that a careful read of the introduction to the document referred to makes it very clear it is none of those things as it is full of very sensible caveats.
John Farley is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2011, 22:25
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Article from TIME: "You Provide The Pictures, I'll Provide The War" -... - StumbleUpon
Load Toad is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2011, 04:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2011, 16:03
  #38 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,578
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Buying a few more pounds or cubic feet of space is no bad thing on a stealth platform. Visuals aside, observables are not related to size (sometimes bigger is better) and you can't follow the F-16-like growth path of adding bigger drop tanks, extra spines and conformals. Also, a bit of extra surface area for LO comms and EW antennas can come in handy.

Agree on APA. They are not perfect, but for some reason have acquired a flock of detractors, some of them complete loonies.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2011, 14:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flight today at Chengdu has been cancelled, according to the Chinese forums. VIPs were noted getting a guided tour of the aircraft. The airspace was cleared and the nearby international airport was closed down for the period.



According to the Chinese forums many spectators were moved on from the best viewing spots. People were even up the trees!



Looking at the images it is clear that the weather got in the way!

New video of J-20 being towed. Taken from eastern side of Chengdu.



TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2011, 01:23
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rovertime
Can the F-35 already be considered 'toast'?
Discussed here:
What China's New J-20 Stealth Fighter Means for the F-35 JSF and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet
Yes, Carlo Kopp has had a field day with this one and has taken it as another opportunity to decry the F-35/F-18F combo in favour of the unavailable F-22. He knows his stuff far better than I do, but I don't know if anyone is in a position to make the claims he does based purely on the poor quality pictures available and without access to information on the true capabilities of the F-22/F-35/T-50/J20 (that is understandably kept well-guarded and the latter are only prototypes!), and if so they could be saving aerospace companies a lot of money by drafting advanced stealth designs without the need for all that testing and whatnot :

Originally Posted by Carlo Kopp
The stealth shaping is without doubt considerably better than that seen in the Russian T-50 PAK-FA prototypes and, even more so, than that seen in the intended production configuration of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
He then goes on to say how the F-35 hasn't got a prayer against this jet in an engagement. F-35 capability controversies aside, it seems like force multipliers should have a significant impact on any hypothetical matchup. I think he tends to be a bit over zealous.

Last edited by MudRat_02; 8th Jan 2011 at 01:53.
MudRat_02 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.