Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Training Pipeline Clogged

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Training Pipeline Clogged

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Dec 2010, 21:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 'Straya
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At a recent squadron function I chatted to a few old friends now on IOT. The pilot branch lad was full of doom and gloom, he claimed that seventy five percent of the last 60(r) course were offered either sixteen month holds or redundancy, and things looked really bad for him. The ABM branch lad was understandably smug. For myself going into IOT in 2011 I have a suspicion that I might just be OK, narrowly avoiding the kneejerk pilot pogroms, but I'm touching a heck of a lot of wood, and preparing contingency plans.

Has anybody else heard much else?
RookiePilot is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2010, 16:51
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RP

You are hopelessly over-optimistic young man.

All the WSO students, bar the senior course who were about to graduate, were given an arbitrary chop before Xmas and the pilot trainees do not seem to be getting away with it either.

There is NO guarantee that a place on IOT will ever get your bum on the seat of a military aircraft.

CS
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2010, 16:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC, Regt still recruiting for Officers! If you think you're good enough to pass JROC......
rock34 is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2010, 22:02
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ?
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At a recent squadron function I chatted to a few old friends now on IOT. The pilot branch lad was full of doom and gloom, he claimed that seventy five percent of the last 60(r) course were offered either sixteen month holds or redundancy, and things looked really bad for him.
I'd check your facts on this........

I.E. its wrong!
scottyhs is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 05:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hiq et Ubique
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Care to enlighten those that are not as informed as you then Scott(y) H-S?
MAD Boom is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 11:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So offering movement in to a trade group (NCA) that is looking at getting rid of people! how does that work?

really gonna hack off those NCA that lose there jobs
valveclosed is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 12:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
transfer to NCA?

I dont think so. NCA recruiting is closed.

CS
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 12:25
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ?
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Care to enlighten those that are not as informed as you then Scott(y) H-S?
Yeh, the last 60(R) course were not offered redundancy.
scottyhs is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 12:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England formerly Great Britain
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeh, the last 60(R) course were not offered redundancy.
That will be half an answer then. So what were they offered?
Admin_Guru is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 13:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 'Straya
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are hopelessly over-optimistic young man.

All the WSO students, bar the senior course who were about to graduate, were given an arbitrary chop before Xmas and the pilot trainees do not seem to be getting away with it either.

There is NO guarantee that a place on IOT will ever get your bum on the seat of a military aircraft.

CS
Damn, that sounds scary. Like I said, I'll be touching a lot of wood, and drawing up contingency plans (probably the RAAF - their website says that pilot is a priority job so I'm hoping they're not in quite a bad state as we are)
RookiePilot is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 16:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To add a wee bit of meat onto Scotty's post.

One of the current courses which started at 60 sqn in early autumn have only managed a couple of flights apiece, have been told to come back from leave at the end of January, but not to expect to fly until June / July time due to a backlog on OCUs which is to be cleared before 60 carry on normal jogging.
floating_rock is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 17:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the edge
Posts: 237
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If you do get told to expect a big hold, don't worry. In the early 90's I held for a total of three and a half years between courses and it didn't do me any harm.........Apart from that liver damage thing and a minor dose of the clap.
The devil makes work .........
Arty Fufkin is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 17:46
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Arty, and the cynic injection and the career break - you would be over 55 before you could be considered for CAS.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 18:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the edge
Posts: 237
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Eh?

I never really wanted to be CAS. Mind you, I'm not a nav, so I've got better things to be getting along with.

Take the hold, get paid, get to be a pilot. It's ace!
Arty Fufkin is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 20:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arty

...if only the long hold was still on offer. Short/medium term pilot trainee requirements are looking so low that it may be that large numbers will be disposed of (to any other available branch (non-aircrew) or possibly outside).

CS
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2010, 21:10
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like the perfect opportunity to re-endow Ops posts with aircrew - the Ops Spt branch was only formed when there weren't enough aircrew to man them anyway
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 07:31
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: High Wycombe
Age: 53
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tranche 1 Redundancy..........

CS,

The first Tranche of redundancies is likely to include c100-200 ab-initio pilots, 150 WSOps, 50 ME WSOs, some fast jet WSOs & loads of TG1! Watch this space.......!

SB
ScribblyBloke is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 07:46
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,448
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
SB,

I think you'll find that at least some of the numbers you have quoted are the target figures for the whole redundancy period.

Now whether they will "front load" tranche 1 in order to achieve exits as fast as possible I don't know, but would be surprised if it included numbers as high as you have indicated. One would have to ask what is the point/need for tranches 2 and 3 (I realize it is not just about aircrew...!!) if you are going to achieve all your planned redundancies in tranche 1......
Biggus is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England formerly Great Britain
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biggus,

Whilst I can see the logic of your comments, however they have to be balanced by the knowledge of two entire fleets being scrapped and an awfull lot of people already on gardening leave. With the best will in the world, there are redundancy ripe individuals without portfolio, and sadly sooner rather then later may be the optimal way forward.

In fact it will be a credit to the chaps at Manning if they are able to sucessfully sort this out within timeframe. Though if rushed, mistakes will be made and assets to service (good people) lost.
Admin_Guru is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2010, 08:51
  #40 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
For some being pushed early might be better than hanging on and getting pushed late.

Traditionally tranche 1 cleaves the majority and tranche 2 does a fine tune with tranche 3 clearing up some who have a useful job in the near term.

Equally traditionally the axe will prove too blunt and holes will appear where none were expected.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.