Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

MFTS - 'Getting Sticky'

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

MFTS - 'Getting Sticky'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 14:42
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
No, but then if you pay peanuts, you will attract monkeys.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 15:30
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arrrrrrrgh
Age: 55
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, but
No but, yer but, if you pay carrots, you will get rabbits.
Really annoyed is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 20:03
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
RA's post instantly proving the case in point. He must be the CEO at Ascent.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 21:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arrrrrrrgh
Age: 55
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear. Now there is the bitter rant of a man who didn't get the rotary crewman job at ascent paying nearly 50k recently. I am sure something will turn up soon minidumb, you just need to keep stacking those shelves a little longer.
Really annoyed is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 09:08
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mold
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Really Annoyed

Ascent should have a capital letter and you should have capital punishment.
Are you a spin doctor? I do believe that you are being a tad economical with the truth pal!
Isn't what you've said about MGD tantamount to revealing his or her identity? I believe that is against the rules, you nob.

Last edited by xenolith; 23rd Jul 2011 at 10:41.
xenolith is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 10:42
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
Xenolith,

Too be fair, RA is just fishing for a bite. It's easier than getting involved in a debate that he doesn't really understand - but that's what bangs his drum.

You are right though, and getting back to the subject of MFTS, his use of the word 'nearly' is creative, and he is so far wide of the mark he could have added 100k after it and been 'nearly' as accurate. That's why when I stopped laughing, I 'nearly' applied.

They are relying heavily on people supplementing poor pay with their pensions, and so will attract either those with little motivation to knock out a good product, or those whom are a very long way from the front-line. I am therefore not completely overwhelmed with surprise that the whole MFTS, and rotary in particular is in danger of ending up a cake and @rse party.

I'm sure there will be a few good blokes, but the chances of them overcoming the inertia of a 'cheapest bid' project, where most of the funding ends up on the balance sheets of the larger corporate stakeholders, is fairly remote.

Last edited by minigundiplomat; 23rd Jul 2011 at 10:53.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 10:55
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
They are relying heavily on people supplementing poor pay with their pensions, and so will attract either those with little motivation to knock out a good product, or those whom are a very long way from the front-line.
The sage advice has always been to give a very wide berth indeed to any company which attempts such a strategy! Their pay and T&S must be as least as good as on offer from any other organisation. If they think that 'topping up' a military pension with low pay is acceptable, then people need to disabuse them of that idea PDQ!

If it all turns to a complete cake and ar$e party, I will make an exception to my normal code and wallow in schadenfreude. MFTS really is a complete and utter load of bolleaux - as any experienced QFI could have told the MoD, had they asked....
BEagle is online now  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 11:17
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
Beagle,

Spot on, Chap.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 12:39
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The sage advice has always been to give a very wide berth indeed to any company which attempts such a strategy! Their pay and T&S must be as least as good as on offer from any other organisation. If they think that 'topping up' a military pension with low pay is acceptable, then people need to disabuse them of that idea PDQ!
Afraid it's not just Ascent - this is rife within MOD - especially in those organisations and agencies with fairly specialist roles which employ a mix of civil servants and military and rely in part on ex-mil personnel for their knowledge and operational experience. I know of one organisation who a few years back was trying to entice officers at their option point with a salary in the low-mid 20k on the basis that they had a pension to top up their salary. It wouldn't be so bad apart from 1. if it isn't illegal to base a salary on an individual's other income sources to save cash, it's immoral and 2. it does nothing to encourage those people that do join to put the effort in or go the extra mile when doing the exact same role as the mil guy sitting next to them for half the pay.

I'm with Beags and MGD on this one - any organsiation that has a personnel strategy based on those principles deserves to fail.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 13:08
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
I will make an exception to my normal code and wallow in schadenfreude.
Really?2345678
diginagain is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 13:30
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Melchett et al - not uncommon in the civvie world - get someone retiring with a Service pension and pay them a lower than market rate salary - called "economics"
Wander00 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 13:44
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
Melchett et al - not uncommon in the civvie world - get someone retiring with a Service pension and pay them a lower than market rate salary - called "economics"
A fair point, and I agree completely wrt to economic reality. However, if you are failing to attract the calibre of person you require, or those with the relevant qualifications or experience then the project is ultimately doomed to failure.

If you asked a builder to project manage the building of your house, how would you feel if he pocketed 50% and then said 'we can't actually get any tradesmen, but Ive got all the materials for you'? or 'A qualified electrician was too expensive, so I've employed the milkman to do the wiring and electrics?

I agree, anyone bidding on a project has to be competitive, but they also have to deliver.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 14:21
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 37
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
Red face Coffee Mate?

I was in the crewroom when the incident mentioned happened. It was a Group Captain and a very pleasant Flt Flt QFI, they had done the weather ship and the crewroom was full of instructors and students hanging on every word to know whether they would be flying...the absolute embarrassment of said GC when he realised his misunderstanding of the 'Coffee Mate? situation was almost as painful for us to watch as it was for him as the realisation dawned..Scampton, CFS crewroom 1986.....
stickstirrer is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 16:26
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I the only one to hear the rumour that all is not well within MFTS?
Maybe the review of MFTS, announced in SDSR, is about to be published? I've heard rumours of large cuts in the number of FTRS instructors on UASs (single-service) to help fund MFTS training (tri-service), but one thing's for sure; all the numbers have changed so much in the last year that something radical's probably brewing.
LFFC is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 15:34
  #55 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,385
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Elbit-KBR Team Tapped for UK Trainer Competition

LONDON — Three fixed-wing aircraft types — including the Beechcraft T-6C — are set to train British military pilots following the selection of a team involving Elbit Systems and KBR to supply and support the platforms, according to executives familiar with the competition.

The executives said the team, known as Affinity, has emerged as the winning bidder and has been selected for further negotiations by Ascent, the Lockheed Martin-Babcock partnership running a 30-year deal with the British Defence Ministry, to manage pilot and crew training for the armed forces. Ascent referred questions to the MoD. Ministry officials were unable to respond at press time. The Affinity consortium members also declined to comment.

The Affinity bid included Beechcraft’s T-6C turboprop basic trainer, a modified Embraer Phenom 100 light business jet for multi-enginetraining and the Grob 120TP elementary trainer, executives said. Under the 15-year availability deal, Affinity will provide and support the fixed-wing flying training element of the UK Military Flying Training System (MFTS) program. The contract is expected to be worth more than £500 million (US $795 million) to Affinity. It is not clear whether the decision has to be ratified by the MoD and others in government.

Contract signature is scheduled to take place by 2015, assuming Affinity and Ascent successfully conclude negotiations. If Affinity sticks to the timescale laid out by Ascent, introduction of the new aircraft types could get underway in 2017 with the Grob 120TP, followed a year later by the Phenom 100 and then the T-6C.............
ORAC is online now  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 18:45
  #56 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I thought the entire Ascent programme for the provision of the MFTS was about to go down the pan? Hard to understand as the mil have provided/carred out most of the hard work in course construction, all they need to do is provide the jets.........
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 18:57
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 545 Likes on 147 Posts
CBTL

It's a great rumour to start but based on your apparent understanding of the structure of the programme I'll take it with a pinch of salt!
BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 19:56
  #58 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So BV, what have they actually provided.......? My understanding is that we own the T2, the DHFS contract has been extended because it was TFD to sort out, and nearly 3 years after the Dominie's last flight the system is no closer to undertaking any of the initial rear crew trg.

Ultimately, without the mil effort to fill the knowledge gaps that Ascent have/had the whole programme would have ground to a halt years ago. You have to ask what company would let a contract then provide all the SMEs to do the work?

It would be interesting to read the NAO report on what vfm this whole debacle has provided the tax payer?
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2013, 21:13
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 545 Likes on 147 Posts
CBTL

I'm afraid I know too many of the people involved on both sides of the fence to discuss it on an open forum. They will recognise my pprune name as well. I value my future employment opportunities too much to fall into that trap!
I only have personal experience of the T2 portion so can't speak with auhtority on the programme as a whole.
I guess we should just wait and see what happens.
BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2013, 13:04
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
introduction of the new aircraft types could get underway in 2017 with the Grob 120TP, followed a year later by the Phenom 100 and then the T-6C.............
Well if they have chosen the 120 TP for EFT that is definitely a positive step forward. Not so sure about the choice of Phenom 100 for MEPT - can't see that handling too well in the low level environment. T-6C is probably the aircraft we should have been operating all along (in its PC-9 form) but would be interested to know how T-6C compares to the PC-21.

If we do get all of these I have only one major hope - that they will all be on the military register from the start and that we don't recreate the fiasco of the G115s and King Airs by having them on the civil register.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.