Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Raf Rivet Joint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raf Rivet Joint

Just seen a actual copy of the SDSR. Page 6!
RIVET JOINT is safe! Factoid!

MRAF is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BINGO! Some sanity at last.....

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: everywhere the Army sends me
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Rivet Joint, goodbye Sentinel!
EmeraldToilet is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will Sentry's be providing the airframes for the rivet joints?
NURSE is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 51st State
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
will Sentry's be providing the airframes for the rivet joints?

No, ex USAF decades old frames, first one already being converted.
HaveQuick2 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SDSR page 28

"withdraw the Sentinel airborne ground surveillance aircraft once it is no longer required to support operations in Afghanistan."
Don't understand this one at all.

Nurse

Will Sentry's be providing the airframes for the rivet joints?
Almost certainly not - the Sentry is a 707 derivative (C-137 series) - rather than Rivet Joint which is a KC-135 derivative, based on the original Boeing 367-80 prototype with it's narrower fuselage.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 15:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the wife
Posts: 371
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Nurse wrote:

will Sentry's be providing the airframes for the rivet joints?
Surely MOD should have learnt the lesson that 'cut and shut' jobs when converting other airframes always seems to end in tears (and no aeroplane).
4mastacker is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 16:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Devon
Age: 71
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 2010 edition of the British spotters Bible "Military Aircraft Markings" list the USAF serials for the 3 Jointed Rivets that are due to join the RAF , they are all F.Y.'64 RC-135W models , so all 3 airframes will be well over 45 years old when back in service !
grandfer is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well there'll be some Comet-type airframes knocking about at Woodford/Warton/Kinloss. New engines & wings available too.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Refurbished US Airframes

There should be no problem with the Rivet Joint. Although the last C-135 airframe was built in FY 1963/1964, the USAF is anticipating not retiring the last until 2040 ! I can't speak for the mission equipment but at least it will have commonality with US variants and presumably upgrades will be offered from time to time.

The last time we procured surplus, refurbished aircraft from the US, we got the bargain of the 20th century. Qty 15 x F-4J(UK) were bought for only GBP 120 M including GSE and spares. Originally, they were going to be retired when due a Major servicing (after about 3-4 years) but in the end gave good service for 8 years (1984-1992) with 74 Sqn (Tigers).
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North of the UK's no.1 aircraft carrier parking spot
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slight correction for you RAFEng, 74 gave up the J at the start of '91 and flew the FGR.2 until the end in Oct '92
Norma Stitz is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:13
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
I stand corrected - still good value though. Phantoms Phorever !
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: on track, on speed, on time
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MRAF

Stop posting here and get on with your new job!

Regards

One of the original Claws
PARALLEL TRACK is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N51 09".94 W001 45".51
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is someone saying we are getting rid of the new sentinel aircraft that we have only recently aquired ?
billynospares is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North of the UK's no.1 aircraft carrier parking spot
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Er...yes, the government is saying just that
Norma Stitz is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, we turn the Sentinel belly canoe into a baggage pod, throw some leather at the cabin and give the jets to 32 Sqn for gucci jets. Winner!
rolandpull is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unbelievable waste.
glad rag is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unbelievable waste

You mean like the £ 4.8 Bn already spent on MRA4. However much it will be on 2 carriers, 1 of which will need to be sold straight away and the other won't have any aircraft to fly off it. Oh and if they do decide to sail it anywhere they won't have the long range maritime picture because we have slashed the surface fleet, sub surface fleet and long range MPA.

This isn't a strategic defence review no matter how hard they try to sell it; we all know the capabilities ARE required. This is an immediate survival exercise to prevent the country from going bankrupt. In the meantime forget any claims we had to the Malvinas, North Atlantic trade routes etc etc. We are now about to become a third world nation who for some reason still has a nuclear deterrent.
nav attacking is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 19:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Nav Attacking - send one of the returning Bdes from Germant to the FIs then. That kind of makes the islands difficult to take; Nimrod or no Nimrod!

There are many ways to skin a cat...

BTW, what current threats are there to the North Atlantic Trade Routes?
The B Word is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2010, 19:59
  #20 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,385
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Defense News: Tanker Arrives for Conversion to Intel Role for RAF

LONDON - The first of three Boeing KC-135 tankers scheduled to be converted to Rivet Joint signals intelligence-gathering aircraft for the Royal Air Force has arrived at prime contractor L3 Communications' U.S. factory.

This will kick off what British officials have termed an unparalleled cooperation agreement, allowing RAF crews to co-man U.S. Air Force Rivet Joint RC-135W aircraft in combined operations until the new aircraft are delivered. An agreement to include the British machines in a joint capability upgrade, support and maintenance program with their U.S. counterparts until at least 2025 was ground-breaking, according to Ministry of Defence program leader Bill Chrispin, quoted in an in-house magazine.

The British are scheduled to withdraw the remaining two Nimrod R1's that have been providing signals intelligence in places like Afghanistan sometime next year, leaving a three-year break until the first of the new U.S.-provided aircraft enters service in 2014. The final aircraft will not be delivered until 2018, an RAF spokesman said.

Analysts reckon U.S. Rivet Joint's partly crewed by British personnel will be tasked to fill a key capability gap in Britain's defenses until the fleet of Boeing aircraft arrives. The spokesman declined to comment on how the British will plug the hole in its intelligence-gathering capability. Four RAF crews are due to start training at Offutt Air Base, Neb., next year. Airborne mission operators, pilots, ground exploitation operators and support personnel will be involved.

The British program, known as Airseeker, is expected to cost 700 million pounds ($1.1 billion) in procurement and a further 500 million pounds in support costs, including co-manning, up to 2025. Although the Airseeker aircraft will be British-owned and -operated, the aircraft will become part of a combined fleet of 20 U.K./U.S. machines and associated systems managed by a team based at L3's Greenville, Texas, factory.

Under terms of the deal, the British aircraft will be refurbished and the mission systems upgraded every four years, according to the Desider magazine.
ORAC is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.