Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Wimpies & Stirlings

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Wimpies & Stirlings

Old 11th Sep 2010, 13:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Langley
Age: 82
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wimpies & Stirlings

Having watched 'one of our aircraft is missing' prompts me to ask if there is a Wellington or Stirling still in flying condition?
Moldiold2 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 14:06
  #2 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It would appear that there are no Wellingtons flying as only two are apparently in existence:

Iconic war plane the Vickers Wellington Bomber moved from the Royal Air Force museum near Colindale to begin five year restoration (From Times Series)

And it would appear that no complete Stirling exists at all:

Wreckage of Short Stirling bomber LJ628 in the Dark Peak, Derbyshire, September 1988. | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

and

STIRLING PROJECT NEWSLETTER NO the last newsletter is 08/09.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 14:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need to read Newsletter No 10 which refers to a Stirling boxed in Russia on the Stirling Project website
millerscourt is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 17:53
  #4 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Read the Wellington link:

AN ICONIC second world war bomber, which featured in the 1955 film The Dam Busters, has been moved from its home at the Royal Air Force museum to undergo a five year restoration...

...The Vickers Wellington was designed by famous engineer and inventor Barnes Wallis in the mid-1930's.

Wallis is best known for his invention of the bouncing bomb, used to attack the dams of the Ruhr Valley during the Second World War. The attack was the subject of the iconic war film The Dam Busters, in which the Wellington had a starring role.
Nice bit of research there, Zoe...
Two's in is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 18:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: london
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Starring role by the Wellington"


So far as aware the Dam Buster raid was an entirely Lancaster bomber
operation.
pasir is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 18:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Starring role in the film, not the raid.

Last edited by Dr Jekyll; 11th Sep 2010 at 18:47.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 18:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The Wellington certainly did appear in The Dam Busters (flown by Patrick Barr playing the part of Mutt Summers), although of course the Lancaster had the starring role.

Barnes Wallis is seen waiting to see someone at the Air Ministry to ask for the use of a Wellington for trials. "Would it help if I told you I designed it?" is the line immediately before the Wellington takes off.

Smart ar$es, don't be so quick to criticise!
BEagle is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 18:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Asia/Europe
Age: 64
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NIce one BEagle!

Although not used in the raid, Wellingtons were used as the aircraft in many of the trial bomb runs of the "bouncing bomb"...many were lost during this trial phase and without the recognition they deserve.
simflea404 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2010, 19:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: london
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... Dr Jekyl - Sorry about misunderstanding that IMO was all down
to misuse of the term 'starring role' - but thanks for clarification - and a civilised reply.

...
pasir is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 04:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THE STIRLING AIRCRAFT SOCIETY presents THE STIRLING PROJECT

Interesting; thanks PN.

F-in-L flew Wimpy and Stirling. The Wimpy whistled apparantly, when you chucked the coal on and the Stirling took an age to gain sufficient height/speed to raise the gear (sometimes a few miles) but was frisky enough at altitude to scare most fighters in affil.
Al R is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 04:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, England
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A minor point, but that should be 'Wimpys', not 'Wimpies'. They were named after J. Wellington Wimpy, a character in the Popeye cartoons: J. Wellington Wimpy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SomeGuyOnTheDeck is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 09:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
IIRC the final graveyard for Stirlings was Edsel, in Scotland, together with the Halifaxs.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 09:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,299
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
A minor point, but that should be 'Wimpys', not 'Wimpies'

IIRC the final graveyard for Stirlings was Edsel

A minor point, but that should be "Edzell" (in case anyone goes Googling), not "Edsel" - which nearly created the final graveyard for Ford in Detroit!

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 14:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Kent, UK.
Posts: 370
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Wellington was recovered from Loch Ness and restored at the Brooklands Museum.
‘R Robert’ has been left partually covered to show the geodetic construction. It was designed by Vickers under the leadership of Rex Pearson. In a interview I have seen on a DVD George Edwards told the story that his first job on joining Vickers was to design the tailplane.
mmitch.
mmitch is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 14:29
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew a former Stirling pilot during my RNZAF Service. AVM Larry Siegert ( CAS Oct 76 - Oct 79) Was a Stirling Captain, aged 19 in 1944 and dropping supplies over Normandy when attackled by three German fighters, which he managed to avoid, shooting one down in the process. At his funeral a couple of years ago, another former RNZAF CAS/CDS and Lancaster pilot Sir Dick Bolt described Siegert as "the finest natural pilot he'd ever met". In the 1953 Air Race to NZ, the RNZAF entered one of its new Hastings C3s, flown by Siegert, who gained a AFC for a night landing [Ceylon?] in a tropical thunderstorm and on three engines. Siegert once told me the Stirling had a major design fault in that it was made to fit the standard RAF hangar of the time, hence the wingspan was less than ideal!
Samuel is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 15:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: london
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sam - I beleive you are correct regarding the wing span of the Stirling -
as you say - cut shorter on account of the standard RAF hangars of the day - I beleive this then contributed to its poor ceiling performance which
from memory was around 17 - 19,000 ft. - having rather a brief spell of
operational service when the Halifax and Lancaster began to appear.

...
pasir is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 15:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
cut shorter on account of the standard RAF hangars of the day
That's not true is it?
I thought it was on account of packing cases and also being the same wing as another Shorts design. Also wasn't the specification for short(ish) take-off and the design also to transport troops & then support them. So it was a bit of mash up of requirements.

I heard a story about one fighting off 2 Me110 fighters - apparently the wing loading (?) meant it had good handling qualities...?
Load Toad is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 16:47
  #18 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I have been told that the standard RAF Hangars were indeed a design factor for many RAF aircraft including the Vulcan. Not sure about the Victor 2 that was 9 feet greater.

The hangars were extremely advanced buildings incorporating split power supplies and utilities, blast doors and blow out roofs. Trenchard, I was told, was keener to get the RAF Infrastructure right and in the right places too, knowing that new aircraft would be transient whereas the hangars would persist for a long time.

Shame Sir Basil Embrey didn't plan ahead when he concreted east Anglia.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 18:11
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was it true Load Toad? Absolutely!

The original Stirling ndesign had a greater wingspan as designed. The RAF rejected this proposal based on the wingspan, demanding it to be made shorter so that the aircraft would fit in RAF aircraft hangers that had standard door openings of 100 ft (30.48 m). This requirement would severely restrict the Stirlings operational altitude.
Samuel is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 18:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A minor point, but that should be "Edzell" (in case anyone goes Googling), not "Edsel" - which nearly created the final graveyard for Ford in Detroit!
Should have known that, I drive by it enough times.
The result was the same. Designed by a committee and not up to the job.
Fareastdriver is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.