Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Blair "Almost" Ordered RAF to Shoot Down a Civilian Airliner

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Blair "Almost" Ordered RAF to Shoot Down a Civilian Airliner

Old 1st Sep 2010, 16:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,637
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Blair "Almost" Ordered RAF to Shoot Down a Civilian Airliner

According to comments in today's press about Blair's memoirs he almost had a civilian passenger plane shot down post 9/11.

A passenger plane flying over London was almost shot down in the panic after the 9/11 attacks.
RAF fighters were in the air ready to destroy the airliner which had failed to respond to radio messages. "I had the senior RAF commander authorised to get my decision," Blair wrote. "The fighter jet was airborne. For several anxious minutes we talked, trying to desperately to get an instinct as to whether this was a threat or mishap.
"The deadline came. I decided we should hold back. Moments later the plane regained contact. It had been a technical error. I needed to sit down and thank God after that one."
Anyone know anymore about this incident, which would I expect have been the major topic in crew-room conversations for some time afterwards?
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 17:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Surely even the oleaginous Trust-me-Tone had been briefed about standard intercept procedures.

Presumably he had to wait for Dubya to tell him what to do.....

What a shower of ****e nuLabor truly were......
BEagle is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 17:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh no . . . It can't be true . . . I have to agree with HIM again.

Evenin' gov

DD

ps. Great word - spot on.

Last edited by Dengue_Dude; 1st Sep 2010 at 17:40. Reason: Addition
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 19:36
  #4 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,691
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts
Smells of political "Waltism"...

..... isn't tis the man who cliamed to have run a way from school to watch a footie match which occurred efore he was born or something equally obviously false.

Don't trust anything the man says.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 20:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,473
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Shame the fighter never got a "Lock On Tone", then took the "Tone" out..

The bloke lives in a dream world........ watching him tonight how he and Labour, brought the welfare state and the country into the 21st century (missing out the "we have financially crippled the country in doing so, for years to come") amazed me, he actually believes the sh*t he is shovelling.....
NutLoose is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 20:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After the next round of defence cuts it might be difficult to find a fighter pilot who would shoot down a civilian aircraft that looked intent on attacking Whitehall.
soddim is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 21:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was the 18.30 Edinburgh - Heathrow shuttle. Passenger list read in alphabetical order:
ANDREWS, C
BROWN, G
D.......
Legalapproach is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 22:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: R4808E
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the rate that 9 homes Tone is collecting real estate he will soon have more homes than the RAF have aircraft.
Navy_Adversary is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 02:25
  #9 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Some better headlines that suggest the fearless nature of the man:

Blair "almost" ran the country for 10 years
Blair "almost" commanded the respect of the Armed Forces
Blair "almost" had the balls to say no to invading Iraq
Balir "almost" told the truth to the Chilcott Inquiry
Blair "almost" kept his word to Gordon Brown
Balir "almost" stopped acting like a poodle

You get the idea I'm sure...
Two's in is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 06:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting back to the thread I would think that all the leaders of democratic western states found themselfs in the "almost" position because the situation was so unclear.

Unfortunatly the only peope who grasped with both situation with both hands was the "security" industry, they saw the chance to charge big money for putting lots of low paid numptys at airport security gates!

What we need now is for someone in government to turn on these people who ramp up the paranoia for personal proffit and get airport security back to a resonable level.
A and C is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 08:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Soddim said

"After the next round of defence cuts it might be difficult to find a fighter pilot who would shoot down a civilian aircraft that looked intent on attacking Whitehall."

Frankly, I fear it might be hard to find a fighter pilot - fullstop.
oldbaldeagle is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 08:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: France
Age: 82
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind finding a Fighter Pilot, anyone know where you can borrow a B52 ??
I'm not busy next week so would be happy to help load and crew !!
rogerk is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 09:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A passenger plane flying over London was almost shot down in the panic after the 9/11 attacks. "The deadline came. I decided we should hold back. Moments later the plane regained contact. It had been a technical error. I needed to sit down and thank God after that one."
Dear oh dear. Does he really expect anyone to believe him? The man's deranged - but very very rich.
forget is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 09:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a hopefully more staid discussion, I wouldn't be surprised if this happens more often than let on.

I was at a firm with aircraft flying around Windsor when 9/11 happened, and naturally ATC were a bit nervous... at one stage, just after we were allowed to fly again, a 'rogue' non-squawking target was spotted heading into Windsor airspace, obviously a big no-no .

One of our aircraft was vectored to identify it, so much for F-3's - it had to be our worst, heaviest most clapped out C 172 whose only weapon was a 400mm lens !

It proved to be an innocent berk in a PA28, whose transponder was probably the same make we used, often got calls from ATC about it.

Remember that in the early days of the Falklands a civilian Boieng 707 was very nearly taken out by Sea Dart, and there are quite a few passengers of a Korean 747 ( which may or may not have been up to something ) who would like their fare and their lives back...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 09:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a hopefully more staid discussion, I wouldn't be surprised if this happens more often than let on.
Interceptions of course; but mulling over whether or not to shoot down a probably innocent airliner from over-head London? Think about it.
forget is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 09:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was still working at the time, although maybe not at the exact time, and I recall nothing about this "incident". I know my aged brain is knackered but I can't help thinking that West Drayton, which was infested with civil and military ATC types, would have been humming like mad if such a thing had occurred. If an aircraft radio-failed in the approach sector it would not be wholly unknown and I don't think ATC would have pushed red buttons. And just how quickly could a fighter get to the scene?

Maybe there is someone out there who was on watch at the time and can answer one way or another.......?
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Mulling over to shoot down a probably innocent airliner over London' -

This must be the toughest one ever, but to be brutally frank if it looks like being steered at a target - and one has the means to shoot it down - a lot of fluttering pieces will of course be horrendous, but not as much of an impact, physical or tactical, as a high velocity airliner ?
Double Zero is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,118
Received 151 Likes on 77 Posts
With regards the "civilian 707" that Double Zero refers to nearly being shot down during the Falklands, was this actually the case?

I could be wrong but I seem to remember something about it being an Argentine Air Force 707 that was shadowing the Task Force and that the UK warned Argentina that if it didn't back off it would be shot down.

Does anyone know what the story was here?
melmothtw is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Argentinian 707s. There were several Harrier intercepts of 707s shadowing the fleet, and opportunities to shoot - 'but the option of firing on a 707 over international waters was unacceptable to the British Government'. (Falklands. The Air War.)

On the 24th April 82 Swiss diplomats advised Argentina that the next UK intercept would produce an attack; following which the 707s backed off.
forget is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Task Force was being followed daily by an Argentinian military 707 in it's progress South, which became a little bothersome.

When they picked up the same radar signature at nearly the routine time ( first law of stress / navigation, you see what you expect to see ) - a Sea Dart missile was within moments of going, which would have been poor PR and probably a stopper on the whole escapade, but one officer had the brains to spot the course and civilian airliner timetable...

Source - " 100 Days ", by Admiral Sandy Woodward ( not a word for word quote but you get the gist, if not buy the ------ book )!
Double Zero is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.