Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:32
  #9761 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,131
Received 319 Likes on 204 Posts
Hempy, the F-22 production run being cut short is a pet peeve of mine. (I'll not digress). From our PoV in the states, our future carrier based aircraft had to be a joint deal (like the old F-111 deal in the 1960's) so that F-35C (CV, replace Hornet) had to be linked to USAF low mix fighter/attack (F-35A, replace Viper) by Congressional mandate.


And so it has, for better and for worse. I see no reason not to make the most of it, even though it is so darned expensive. (I do not blame any of the partner nations for their dismay/frustration at the cost and delay. The complaints are well deserved).
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:39
  #9762 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Politics stinks /endex
Hempy is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 18:05
  #9763 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only benefit the F-35 has is it's stealth capability, which enhances the range of targeting information to be sent back to other weapon carriers?
Ummmm, no. It has sensors (passive and active) that other current fighters don't have and a highband datalink system that no other aircraft has. However, those sensors and datalinks could (in theory) be retrofitted to other legacy aircraft. What stealth provides longer term is the ability to penetrate contested space, loiter there, and gather the targetting data with those sensors.

Assuming radar improves over time and reduces stealth effectiveness, standoff jammers can degrade radar performance to restore stealth effectiveness. At least that's USN's approach to long term viability (hence the Growler). We'll have to wait and see if things work out that way or not.
KenV is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 08:19
  #9764 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, let me rephrase the question.

IF someone was to retrofit MADL and its sensors to say a Super Bug, what advantage other than stealth would an F-35 have over that aircraft? B model VTOL notwithstanding.

What if it was fitted on an F-22?
Hempy is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 11:59
  #9765 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,231
Received 1,502 Likes on 679 Posts
F-35 Program Office Hopeful to Move Out on Ejection Seat Retrofit Plan This Fall
ORAC is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 13:17
  #9766 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,060
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Hempy: IF someone was to retrofit MADL and its sensors to say a Super Bug, what advantage other than stealth would an F-35 have over that aircraft? B model VTOL notwithstanding.

What if it was fitted on an F-22?

A rather rhetorical question to eliminate stealth and STOVL for the B advantages for the F-35, and I think you know the answers performance wise- we know there are areas where performance is less, equal or greater than legacy aircraft- not a game changer here as addressed numerous times on this thread, but a few thoughts:


Advantages:
- New build airframe. Less hours than a rebuilt F/A-18 E/F. Super Hornet hours are getting eaten up quickly.
- Longer range. The C has loads of fuel.
- Reduced maintenance (intended, not there yet)
- More accurate gun (intended, not there yet)
- Reduced training hours.
- A design specifically intended for the sensor and airframe interface. Integrating a very complex sensor and computing suite to a legacy airframe is never a simple bolt on process. There are placement, power, interference, cabling and numerous issues to address. Not without risk, and very expensive if even possible.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 13:28
  #9767 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The VTOL advantage is spurious at best.

That solution is to buy more advanced Super Hornets and its electronic attack variant in the form of the EA-18G Growler while investing in a stealthy new unmanned strike aircraft and a future F/A-XX. To pay for those programs, the Navy could cancel its portion of the F-35 buy and reinvest the money. The Navy would have to accept some risks, but the long-term payoff could save the carrier from obsolescence in the era of precision-guided warfare.
Hempy is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 14:01
  #9768 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV writes:

2. Can the remote sensor platform transmit the above target data at sufficient bandwidth to ensure near real time target tracking? Link 16 lacks the bandwidth.
3. Can the Aegis/SM6 installation receive and process the data in near real enough time to enable a missile launch and then guide that missile to enable the missile to intercept the target?

I suspect that a fourth consideration would be can the remote sensor platform transmit the targeting data securely and with low probability of signal intercept?
E-2D backhaul to the CVG uses Link-16, and it processes a lot of data for multiple targets. Providing initial and midcourse targeting cues against a single target for the SM-6 isn't particularly data intensive, and in fact, Super Hornets and Growlers can and have done the same. This test was to prove MADL compatibility with the latest Aegis baseline, and demonstrate that F-35Bs can provide some over-the-horizon targeting ability for a formation that lacks the ability to support organic AEW assets. However, the F-35B lacks the persistence to perform a meaningful AEW mission, so the hype of this evolution smells of another Marine publicity stunt. The LPI aspect of MADL is an advantage when transmitting from within the enemy's WEZ, although I'm pretty sure that the F-35B's limited range would place the ARG in harms way. And providing updated guidance to the SM-6 is not stealthy, nor is using the F-35Bs radar to track the target.

Last edited by Maus92; 20th Sep 2016 at 14:32.
Maus92 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 15:57
  #9769 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some solutions to get some connectivity between the data link systems.

As stealth aircraft, F-22s are not equipped with conventional datalinks such as Link-16 which can be easily spotted by enemy SIGINT. Instead, they use a unique stealth-qualified, narrow-beam Intra-Flight Data-Link (IFDL) designed to relay data and synchronize a situational picture only among the Raptors. As this stealth datalink is incompatible with all other communications devices, Raptors cannot communicate with other friendly aircraft.

However, because of a dramatic cutback in the number of Raptors purchased—187 bought for operations, compared to the 648 planned in 1996 to be procured—the aircraft must now communicate with F-35s as well as legacy “fourth-generation” fighters such as the F-15, F-16 and F-18 families.

To address the jets' inabilities to link to one another—or to legacy fighters—in air campaigns, their manufacturer, Lockheed Martin, has demonstrated a new data-linking capability it developed for them secretly through “Project Missouri,'” a proprietary program. During the demonstration, Lockheed validated the use of a Link 16 transmit capability from the twin-engine F-22 Raptor and showcased an exotic waveform developed by L-3 Communications and optimized for low-probability of intercept/low-probability of detection transmissions (LPI/LPD), says Ron Bessire, vice president of technology and innovation at the company's Skunk Works.

The demonstration required 8 hr. of flight time and took place Dec. 17 and 19, 2013, Bessire tells Aviation Week. The trials required use of a U.S. Air Force Raptor and the F-35 Cooperative Avionics Testbed (CATbird), a Boeing 737-based flying laboratory that was used as a Joint Strike Fighter surrogate to test F-35 software. The F-22 also was able to transmit to a Link 16 terminal on the ground.
LINK
Bevo is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 18:14
  #9770 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IF someone was to retrofit MADL and its sensors to say a Super Bug, what advantage other than stealth would an F-35 have over that aircraft?
No much. But that's like saying if someone were to retrofit F-4 systems and missiles on a Lightning, what advantage does a Phantom have over a Lightning. First its not at all certain if F-35 systems can be successfully retrofitted to other aircraft and what is certain is that cost would be very high, maybe higher than just buying brand new F-35s in the first place.

And BTW, not even Boeing is proposing such a thing for their F-15. The latest Boeing proposal for the F-15 is NOT to fit F-35 systems on it, but to fit a compatible datalink onto it and enable it to carry even larger numbers of stand off weapons than the E version now carries. Basically, they are proposing to make the F-15 the arsenal plane USAF has been talking about for a while now to accompany the F-35 and give it more firepower.

Boeing Sees Upgunned F-15 As Potential ?Arsenal Plane? | AWIN_Defense content from Aviation Week
KenV is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 18:29
  #9771 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,231
Received 1,502 Likes on 679 Posts
Why would you want to fit F-35 sensors? Frankly they are 30 year old and obsolete, the EO for example. Any upgrade to the F-35 will take years and $Bs, but any new retrofit to another platform would take advantage of the progress since the F-35 sensors were designed.

It would be like deciding to upgrade the radio in an 80s Merc and trying to retrofit an 90s FM set and CD player rather than a DAB/Sirius with an integrated Bluetooth phone system.
ORAC is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 07:43
  #9772 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Following the recent leaked memo on the current status of the F-35 programme, written by DOT&E chief, Michael Gilmore, Morten Hanche, an F-35 pilot has written this reply...

https://theaviationist.com/2016/09/2...-doesnt-agree/

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 08:56
  #9773 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,851
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Lightning II

I heard on Forces News yesterday that we remain committed to buying 138 Bs.

If so, we've got to be mad. I hope, as has been suggested at RIAT earlier this year, that the balance of 90 aircraft beyond the initial confirmed order for 48, will be As.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 10:29
  #9774 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Lightning II

I heard on Forces News yesterday that we remain committed to buying 138 Bs.

If so, we've got to be mad. I hope, as has been suggested at RIAT earlier this year, that the balance of 90 aircraft beyond the initial confirmed order for 48, will be As.

FB
Surely Cs would be a better choice?
glad rag is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 10:32
  #9775 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
No much. But that's like saying if someone were to retrofit F-4 systems and missiles on a Lightning, what advantage does a Phantom have over a Lightning. First its not at all certain if F-35 systems can be successfully retrofitted to other aircraft and what is certain is that cost would be very high, maybe higher than just buying brand new F-35s in the first place.

And BTW, not even Boeing is proposing such a thing for their F-15. The latest Boeing proposal for the F-15 is NOT to fit F-35 systems on it, but to fit a compatible datalink onto it and enable it to carry even larger numbers of stand off weapons than the E version now carries. Basically, they are proposing to make the F-15 the arsenal plane USAF has been talking about for a while now to accompany the F-35 and give it more firepower.

Boeing Sees Upgunned F-15 As Potential ?Arsenal Plane? | AWIN_Defense content from Aviation Week
Interesting Ken, I didn't know Boeing built F35 sensors...
glad rag is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 13:14
  #9776 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhino power
Following the recent leaked memo on the current status of the F-35 programme, written by DOT&E chief, Michael Gilmore, Morten Hanche, an F-35 pilot has written this reply...

https://theaviationist.com/2016/09/2...-doesnt-agree/

-RP
Very interesting. Thank you. It appears that Major Morten “Dolby” Hanche is an F-35 instructor pilot from the Royal Norwegian Air Force.
Originally Posted by Morten Hanche
...I fully expect the F-35’s most hardened critics to discount this article, regardless of what I write. However, some may choose to believe my story, based on the fact that I know the airplane and its capabilities as a pilot. I don’t make my claims based on bits and pieces of information, derived from potentially unreliable sources. They are based on experience actually flying and training with the jet for nearly a year... Personally, I am impressed by the the F-35. I was relieved to experience just how well the F-35 performs with regard to speed, ceiling, range and maneuverability...
FODPlod is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 15:19
  #9777 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two messages

It would be quite nice to know what is real as regards the F35.

DOT&E chief, Michael Gilmore says that the aircraft is not on a good pathway to achieve what it was meant to, the software is late etc etc, other papers say that an F35 with Software version 2B or 3I needs many other assets to enable it to do its job. Whilst Major Morten “Dolby” Hanche seems to say that the 3I plane that he is using with the USAF is the best thing since sliced bread.

Obviously if the 3I F35 is so good, once the flight restrictions are taken off the plane with a full 3F software load and all the developmental steps needed for full release to the USAF and international customers having been achieved, it would seem that a new (5th?) generation of superlatives will be needed...

I am assuming that the truth is somewhere between "It is in a death spiral" and "It is the best thing since sliced bread" it would just be nice to know where on the continuum it is.
PhilipG is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 15:28
  #9778 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting Ken, I didn't know Boeing built F35 sensors...
They don't. Neither does Lockheed. Since airframe manufacturers routinely take others company's systems/parts (from complete engines down to individual rivets and everything in between) and integrate them into their products, it does not really matter to the airframer who builds the systems/parts. Indeed this fact is why essentially every airplane program is a product of a TEAM of companies.
KenV is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 15:31
  #9779 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am assuming that the truth is somewhere between "It is in a death spiral" and "It is the best thing since sliced bread" it would just be nice to know where on the continuum it is.
Might the F-35 be "the best thing since sliced bread" when compared to every other fighter out there, and yet be deficient when compared to the full specification and potential of the design?
KenV is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 16:54
  #9780 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV you might well be right however when there is great excitement that a development airframe, with a test pilot on board and not G limited I would have thought, is said to be outclassed by a two seat F16 as I recall, I find comments about the agility and the like of a G limited F35 being superior to an F16 difficult to take at face value.

If an F22 pilot had taken a ride in a G limited F35 and said that it was "the best thing since sliced bread" I think many people would have been rather surprised, to say the least, possibly it is, I doubt that an F22 pilot would think so though.

Obviously the F35 needs to perform at or near to the specifications that it was designed, or has since been designed to, or there will be holes in many airforces and Royal Navy Carriers with no planes available.

My point was that both reports cannot be correct, it would just be reassuring to know where the project really was...
PhilipG is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.