Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Old 1st Apr 2016, 13:06
  #9121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
............ and another one.
Army Mover is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 16:13
  #9122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Maus92
Some not so good news about the Charlie: Testing was halted back in November after a "small crack" was found in the titanium wing spar, which was downplayed at the time by JPO spokesperson Joe DellaVedova, "Such discoveries are expected during a developmental test program." Note that the JPO was more or less forced to respond to press reports about the cracks - the JPO had not released news of the casualty publicly. Testing resumed in February after repairs, but was halted 3 days later after strain gauges detected further cracking.
Interesting problem, but may not necessarily be a design problem, could be a material processing problem. Manufacturing titanium components can be tricky, whether they are cast or forged. Both processes expose the components being produced to elevated temperatures that form a brittle layer called alpha case. The alpha case must be removed to prevent cracks from developing in service. The usual method of removal is chem-milling the component. But if not done properly, one of two things can result, the alpha case isn't totally removed or hydrogen is introduced from the bath chemicals into the titanium resulting in subsequent hydrogen embrittlement and cracking in service. So I am sure it will be witch hunt to identify the cause and spars affected if it isn't a basic design problem...
Turbine D is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 03:57
  #9123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbine D - The crack in the Ti spar was detected before it became a serious problem, and the aircraft continued to be flown after installing strain gauges to monitor propagation of the fracture. This tells me that they are doing a thorough job with the test program.

The aluminum die forgings used for the fuselage frames also had some fracture issues. Fixing those problems required some expensive changes to the massive die sets used to produce the aluminum forgings. However, I imagine the Ti wing spars are not produced from die forgings since the cost would be prohibitive. They are likely machined from shapes hammer or roll forged from wrought stock. Thus adding thickness in most areas of the spar to resolve the cracking issue would only require modification of the CNC machining program.

Titanium is very sensitive to surface flaws, which can result in fractures propagating from these defects. So the surface of a machined titanium part subject to high stress or fatigue conditions must be smooth and/or mechanically pre-stressed in compression by shot peening.

Titanium also tends to work harden when machined. So Ti parts that are subject to significant machining and stock removal require periodic stress relief treatments to produce a dimensionally stable finished component.
riff_raff is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 15:15
  #9124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@RR: you might be talking about earlier cracking in a different aircraft - you mention that the aircraft was flown after adressing minor cracking. The F-35C that I'm referencing is a test article as mentioned in DOT&E written testimony to Congress last week:

"Structural testing. Major findings are continuing in the durability test articles, particularly in the titanium bulkhead in the F-35C test article. Significant limitations to the life of the fielded F-35C aircraft can only be addressed with intrusive structural modifications prior to the expected full service life, and show again the high cost of concurrent production and development. In the past year, discoveries of unpredicted cracks continued to occur, and in some cases required pauses in testing to determine root causes and fixes. This occurred in all three variants. Currently, only the F-35A structural test article can be tested; it is about to begin the third lifetime test phase, or the third series of 8,000 equivalent flight hours of testing. The F-35B test article is still down for repairs needed to complete the second lifetime. The F-35C test article restarted testing in mid-February but stopped three days later when strain gauges indicated cracking in a titanium bulkhead; it has not yet restarted."
Maus92 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 15:24
  #9125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So that'll be 2020 then for RAF lightning II's then??

Muhahahah.

Not really, they'll just delete more testing benchmarks from the schedule and everything will be just fiinnee.

YAY More Good News!!!

glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 17:06
  #9126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There aren't any "RAF" Lightnings glad rag, only UK ones that will be flown and operated Jointly by the RN and RAF and if there aren't any until 2020 that's news to a LOT of people!!
MSOCS is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 20:04
  #9127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cracking of one wing spar was discovered on an aircraft being used for cyclic testing. The cyclic testing had accumulated the equivalent of 20 years of operational service towards a longer life goal. The problem has been identified as a design problem and not a subsequent manufacturing processing problem. Correcting the design will add one half pound to the weight of the spar. Of course, all assembled and deployed aircraft will require retrofitting the new beefed up spar at a convenient time, lets say short of 20 years.

The wings are bigger on the F35-C version than either the -A or -B versions. I would think the UK version would be good to go by 2018 assuming nothing goes wrong between now and then. Anyhow, what could possibly go wrong between now and then?
Turbine D is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2016, 15:31
  #9128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSOCS
There aren't any "RAF" Lightnings glad rag, only UK ones that will be flown and operated Jointly by the RN and RAF and if there aren't any until 2020 that's news to a LOT of people!!
Ha just new you'd bite on that on matey, here's hoping the RN have shallow pockets because they are going to need them!

wink, wink and all that...
glad rag is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2016, 16:16
  #9129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK on a crosswind
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the general subject of battlefield vulnerability and all that, despite ISIS having a fair bit of portable technology, it seems the USAF is deploying several Broncos to mark targets for them in Iraq/Syria.
Royalistflyer is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2016, 16:24
  #9130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, according to the RAF website, the erstwhile Marham Staish, Harv Smyth, has been appointed OC Lightnings at Marham. Isn't it about time we renamed this thread, as the project, like the banks, is way too expensive to cancel?
27mm is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2016, 16:34
  #9131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey gr, I'd love to believe it was a purposeful phrase, but alas..! The correction was for the wider audience who perhaps don't appreciate the full extent of the Joint arrangement.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2016, 22:49
  #9132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, according to the RAF website, the erstwhile Marham Staish, Harv Smyth, has been appointed OC Lightnings at Marham. Isn't it about time we renamed this thread, as the project, like the banks, is way too expensive to cancel?
5 (AC) had a Sqn boss nicknamed Billy No-Planes* To be fair Sentinel did eventually arrive. Although after he'd done his 2 years of triv-tasking, that is.

*instead of -Mates
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2016, 00:15
  #9133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Maus92- Thanks for correction. I went back and re-read the article. The wing spar crack was in the fatigue structural test airframe and occurred at the equivalent of 6,850 flight hours. It was noted the issue had no impact on current F-35 flying operations.

The previous cracking issue I noted was with the die forged aluminum bulkheads used on the F-35B. Similar to the situation above, the cracking was discovered on the fatigue structural test airframe at 9,400 hours, which is beyond the design requirement of 8,000 hours. People should appreciate that the aluminum die forgings used for the bulkheads are very impressive pieces of manufacturing engineering.

riff_raff is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2016, 02:01
  #9134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snafu,

Perhaps I can help a little - I can confirm that I'm not an employee of LM, nor am I paid to post here ( I understand the term is 'a shill').

To be clear, I was employed by BAE and worked on the F-35 programme for a few years - I don't think I've ever tried to hide that. I left BAE about 10 years ago, and they don't pay me to post either.

Hope this helps

Best wishes as ever to those of any opinion,

Engines
Engines is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2016, 12:20
  #9135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Neverland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Engines. Your postings reflect the statement you make. As far as this outside observer can tell they are factual and present interesting information that contributes to general knowledge. My original post was mostly directed at another posters comments which were coming across very close to a party line to the detriment of the intent behind them, in my opinion.


@Ken V none of which I (or anybody else really) has actually said. You wish people were actually saying those things because it might make your desire to dismiss opinion that does not coincide with yours easier to achieve in reality.
Snafu351 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2016, 15:40
  #9136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Ken V none of which I (or anybody else really) has actually said. You wish people were actually saying those things because it might make your desire to dismiss opinion that does not coincide with yours easier to achieve in reality.
A desire to dismiss opinion? It appears that toeing the orthodox line includes being blind to sarcasm. So be it. Y'all enjoy your orthodoxy.
KenV is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2016, 11:54
  #9137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KenV, the more you post the sillier you look. Stick to JB....it might not increase your (already impressive) post count, but it's more amenable to your demographic.
Hempy is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2016, 13:03
  #9138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the absence of any 'really good' news...

http://theaviationist.com/2016/04/01...f-weapon-jsow/

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2016, 14:32
  #9139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah right...

glad rag is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2016, 15:27
  #9140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glad rag
Yeah right...

Er, ok, I give up, this is related to the F-35 how?

-RP
Rhino power is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.