Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Mar 2016, 23:40
  #9101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RP, I think we'd all like that to happen.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 12:17
  #9102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,196
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by t43562
Some countries are locked into that, some are only partly locked in, some are totally free to do something else so it is a bit relevant to question it. Not that anything said here matters.
I believe I addressed that already, thanks, in terms of orders being cancelled, or likely to be. It is one thing "to question it" and about 450 pages later I don't see what is going on as "question it" but something else entirely. Glue manufacture, mostly. What I find the most disappointing, is the software piece. This aircraft seems to be more software dependent, not less. I suspect that this will amplify problems in configuration and deployment.


Given what I was doing about a decade and a half ago related to a program that DID get cancelled, and the software challenges there, maybe I should not be surprised/disappointed.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 14:15
  #9103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Austria
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any good piece of news about F-35 program?
Backinblack is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 15:02
  #9104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Neverland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an interested taxpayer, amongst other things, the postings of MSOCS are coming across as rather more LM PR than UK military with knowledge (that they can't speak of... !) of the inside workings of the program.


From a purely human point of view if all is fine with the program and all will be revealed to the disappointment and shame of the so called naysayers I would have thought that shutting up and cracking on with the delivery asap would be sufficient reward for such an "insider."


Yet here we have strident and constant posturing in support of the program, claims of harassment whenever inconsistencies in the posturing are pointed out and to top it all actual harassment of those whose views differ from the apparent "insider" view.
Snafu351 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 15:17
  #9105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a purely human point of view if all is fine with the program and all will be revealed to the disappointment and shame of the so called naysayers
Disappointment and shame? Is such possible?
KenV is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 16:14
  #9106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not an LM employee Snafu and apologise if my exuberance for F-35 convinces you otherwise. I assure you that I'd rather inform on this forum - where I can, that is - rather than it spiral into bickering, inexorably.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 17:17
  #9107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,196
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by Backinblack
Any good piece of news about F-35 program?
1. It's not cancelled.
2. They keep delivering aircraft


What do you consider good news?
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2016, 18:11
  #9108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Snafu, I think the point about who works form whom, or more importantly who doesn't, has been thrashed to death here. MSOCS has answered that accusation more than enough times now. What's the point of keep accusing him?

He is a sensible debater with an opinion based on something other than his employer.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 00:31
  #9109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you consider good news?
Er, just wait a moment, Spaz will be along shortly with videos of more successful take-offs and landings followed by pilot testimonies of how great everything is.

Wouldn't mind seeing a sales invoice from LM showing a delivery price for today's aircraft of $80M, but then that probably wouldn't include the engine and a few other things, forget it...
Turbine D is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 01:14
  #9110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,578
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
... let alone a FFP number for getting it to an IOC standard.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 03:37
  #9111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some not so good news about the Charlie: Testing was halted back in November after a "small crack" was found in the titanium wing spar, which was downplayed at the time by JPO spokesperson Joe DellaVedova, "Such discoveries are expected during a developmental test program." Note that the JPO was more or less forced to respond to press reports about the cracks - the JPO had not released news of the casualty publicly. Testing resumed in February after repairs, but was halted 3 days later after strain gauges detected further cracking.
Maus92 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 13:27
  #9112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,196
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by Maus92
Some not so good news about the Charlie: Testing was halted back in November after a "small crack" was found in the titanium wing spar, which was downplayed at the time by JPO spokesperson Joe DellaVedova, "Such discoveries are expected during a developmental test program." Note that the JPO was more or less forced to respond to press reports about the cracks - the JPO had not released news of the casualty publicly. Testing resumed in February after repairs, but was halted 3 days later after strain gauges detected further cracking.
Another set back, but I am not surprised that any/each bump in the road is not publicized. Think about it: if you were running the program, would you go out of your way to stress the issues that arise? That's counter intuitive.


Let the press work for their pay.


People running the tech side probably want to be left alone to solve the problems. From what you say, that crack does not look related to the hook problem that was previously solved, and given where it is ... wonder how long the actual fix / redesign will take?
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 13:58
  #9113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Neverland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Courtney & MSOCS, I wasn't claiming that somebody actually was an employee of LM. I was merely making the point that the current postings rather tended to give that impression. I don't know either way.


However for me endless positive outpourings given the program timeframe, cost to date, actual progress and delivery to date seem logically strange; particularly when the evident desire or need to attempt, somewhat aggressively, to counter simple observation of all of the above four elements is noted.
Snafu351 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 15:48
  #9114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Snafu351
endless positive outpourings
You must be reading a different thread than me.....
Tourist is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 17:13
  #9115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't claiming that somebody actually was an employee of LM. I was merely making the point that the current postings rather tended to give that impression.
I see. So any messenger who brings positive news must be yet another bought and paid for stooge of LM, no matter who they actually work for, apparently even including USN test pilots. And any messenger who brings negative news must be a sainted emissary from the gods providing divine warning of imminent doom. And yes, that last sentence was a bit exaggerated. But sadly only a bit.

And "endless positive outpourings"? On THIS thread?!! Or from the media in THIS universe? There appears to be some kind of parallel universe quite different from this one.
KenV is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2016, 17:47
  #9116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,196
Received 388 Likes on 240 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
I see. So any messenger who brings positive news must be yet another bought and paid for stooge of LM, no matter who they actually work for, apparently even including USN test pilots. And any messenger who brings negative news must be a sainted emissary from the gods providing divine warning of imminent doom. And yes, that last sentence was a bit exaggerated. But sadly only a bit.

And "endless positive outpourings"? On THIS thread?!! Or from the media in THIS universe? There appears to be some kind of parallel universe quite different from this one.
Are the chicks hot there? (Imo, this thread would benefit from the occasional Slasher input, just to keep the tone lighter ...)
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 00:42
  #9117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So any messenger who brings positive news must be yet another bought and paid for stooge of LM, no matter who they actually work for, apparently even including USN test pilots.
Hey Ken, here is good news on the F-35 and certainly I am no stooge of LM. In fact, there are three good news versions:

!. LM good news version
https://www.f35.com/news

2. Defense News good news version
F-35 Will Fly Until 2070 ? Six Years Longer Than Planned

3. Breaking Defense good news version
Current F-35 Costs Drop, But Total Costs Go Up « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary

So there you have it, three good news stories to peruse at your leisure...
Enjoy and have a good weekend.
Turbine D is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 07:44
  #9118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
So the unit price of an F-35B when averaged over the life of the program in 'then year' dollars is a snip at $134M.

Probably best not to buy the early aircraft if you want to save the odd billion.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 09:21
  #9119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-c...-f-35-purchase

This is obviously a bite, I wonder how many people will nibble?
alfred_the_great is online now  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 10:54
  #9120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happy April 1st, Internetz!!
MSOCS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.