Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jun 2015, 12:58
  #6361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't be interesting if Boeing acquired Saab AB? Keeps their fingers in the fighter market once the F-18 line closes, and bridges to the F/A-XX competition.
Maus92 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2015, 18:24
  #6362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by orca
But we agree, don't we, that legacy fighters cannot exist in the threat environment currently fielded. So I assume all F-35 knockers are also content that manned aircraft are no longer viable on the high end battlefield?

As drones haven't made anywhere near the impact they were supposed to - it seems they've done the straight forward long persistence stuff but not anything requiring high performance or high end weaponry, one assumes that the SAM has won full stop.

Not to worry. AT and ISTAR should keep us busy enough. Potentially SH as well but the cushion layer is certainly getting more fruity as time goes by.
orca, believe whatever you want.
glad rag is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2015, 18:43
  #6363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Then what? Buy Indian, obviously! Just hope it has better build quality than a Royal Enfield!


Skijump and traps is all that is required and BAESYSTEMS already have a deal with HAL who make the LCA Tejas as seen in the video.

Simples...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2015, 21:11
  #6364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Impressive Leon.
glad rag is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 14:58
  #6365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be interested to see:

1 - What the "deck run" was for the Tejas in the video.

2 - What its AUW was.

If it can launch with a representative weapons load from a non-catapulted 450ft deck run, then it's "impressive".

Last edited by MSOCS; 28th Jun 2015 at 17:16. Reason: sp
MSOCS is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 16:25
  #6366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MSOCS,

You obviously haven't read the ROE. This aircraft is not F-35 so is therefore to be applauded for every advance it makes no matter how incremental and however many questions it creates. The two you cite aren't a bad starter...how does it stop might be another. (Hooks and wires are apparently dead easy to design, operate, catch and maintain so maybe not).

Nonetheless - great to see another nation serious about the sea base and all it brings. Better still to see a FRS MK51 (stand by to be corrected) sneak in!
orca is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 17:24
  #6367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd assumed that they'd completely nailed the stopping game.

That landing gear doesn't look very suitable for the job though.....but then who am I to dare make a comment on such things.

I guess I'll have to just stick to my comfy armchair, slippers, and opinions founded on media trawling and, "how flying was in my day"

God forbid I ever actually retire....
MSOCS is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 20:34
  #6368 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
LCA Tejas - just about the only programme which makes the development of the F-35 seem short and uncomplicated........
ORAC is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 21:21
  #6369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts


Sorry about the size of the photo, but it isn't mine and I can't resize. Nice looking hook though...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2015, 21:46
  #6370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
PS. I don't think the Indians are stupid. Why would they plough loads of cash into navalised Tejas when they have these for STOBAR ops from their carriers as well...

Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 11:47
  #6371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,578
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Maus92 - I don't think Saab Group is for sale.

Ownership

Orca - But we agree, don't we, that legacy fighters cannot exist in the threat environment currently fielded.

As the old joke has it, "What's with the 'we' , paleface?"

If you say that "fighters with rather creaky analog RWR and, at best, wheezy non-DRFM podded jammers are vulnerable to the current environment", I'm with you.

USAF F-16s are pretty much the GL model compared to most post-1995 exports, let alone a Sufa or the Singapore jets, and don't compare at all with non-U.S. competitors.

Typerated - The Boeing/Saab T-X is a new airplane. My personal opinion is that the JAS 39E/F would be an excellent fit for Guard and Reserve, which will otherwise see their numbers plummet because of F-35's CPFH; the expensive stealth-related stuff is not required for many missions. They'd also be excellent Aggressors against F-35s/F-22s. But it's not going to happen because nobody wants to see Guard/Reserve guys (age and treachery will prevail over youth and prowess) doing velociraptor tricks to the Academy kids in the stealth jets.

Last edited by LowObservable; 29th Jun 2015 at 16:18.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 12:44
  #6372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,197
Received 391 Likes on 242 Posts
As drones haven't made anywhere near the impact they were supposed to
Orca, what do you mean by that? The USN is moving forward with work on that CV based strike drone thing.

As to what UAVs in general have done in the past 10 years ... I can't agree with your assessment, unless "supposed to" means something particular in this case.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 16:43
  #6373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSOCS
Would be interested to see:

1 - What the "deck run" was for the Tejas in the video.

2 - What its AUW was.

If it can launch with a representative weapons load from a non-catapulted 450ft deck run, then it's "impressive".
I was referring to the indigenous nature of the project as being impressive as was commented on later in the the tread.
glad rag is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 17:49
  #6374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for clarifying gr
MSOCS is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 20:46
  #6375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Frensham
Posts: 846
Received 90 Likes on 48 Posts
I can't comment on the veracity of anything reported here but it might be of interest to some.

"A test pilot has some very, very bad news about the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The pricey new stealth jet can’t turn or climb fast enough to hit an enemy plane during a dogfight or to dodge the enemy’s own gunfire, the pilot reported following a day of mock air battles back in January."

More here: https://medium.com/war-is-boring/tes...eid=bbff1c7303
Wokkafans is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 21:45
  #6376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,578
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Now a matter of authenticating the original document...

But this is the proverbial other shoe from this story...

F-35 Tested Against F-16 In Basic Fighter Maneuvers | Defense content from Aviation Week

...which left everyone wondering who came off best in those encounters.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2015, 23:20
  #6377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has been flown in air-to-air combat maneuvers against F-16s for the first time and, based on the results of these and earlier flight-envelope evaluations, test pilots say the aircraft can be cleared for greater agility as a growth option.
I think that one sentence pretty much says what the outcome of ACM with the F-16's was...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2015, 03:55
  #6378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-35's got a slow nose; not good. The fanboys will respond with the *fact* that F-35's superior SA will render dogfighting obsolete. Uh huh.
Maus92 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2015, 06:54
  #6379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
You mean dogfighting isn’t already obsolete
finestkind is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2015, 10:14
  #6380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by finestkind
You mean dogfighting isn’t already obsolete
Just because it's not been used for a while does not render it obsolete. There's always a chance where plinking away with BVR rockets won't be possible/acceptable...

-RP

Last edited by Rhino power; 30th Jun 2015 at 12:28.
Rhino power is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.