PA verses FRI
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PA verses FRI
If a chap was to accept the FRI at IPP, would he then be ineligible for transfer to PA spine/FTC(A) for 5 years? I've heard different things from different people.
You need to have accepted a PA pay spine offer BEFORE you can apply for the FRI.
Here's an interesting question though: what if someone accepts PA, thereby loosing their 38pt option, but then PVRs aged 37yrs and 6 months? Will they still transfer onto the PA spine on their birthday as planned and do their last 6months on full pay? Or will the PA offer be declared void, in which case does their original exit date on their 38th birthday get reinstated?
Just stirring!
Here's an interesting question though: what if someone accepts PA, thereby loosing their 38pt option, but then PVRs aged 37yrs and 6 months? Will they still transfer onto the PA spine on their birthday as planned and do their last 6months on full pay? Or will the PA offer be declared void, in which case does their original exit date on their 38th birthday get reinstated?
Just stirring!
There have been no acronyms in this thread, merely well-known service abbreviations.
You do know the difference between an acronym and an abbreviation, don't you?
You do know the difference between an acronym and an abbreviation, don't you?
As someone who has been out for quite a while, could someone kindly spell out the abbreviations?
I come from the era of SSC (short service commission) and PC (GL) [permanent commission (general list)].
I come from the era of SSC (short service commission) and PC (GL) [permanent commission (general list)].
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: lyneham
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having been really sad and read the Admin Instructions for both the RAF and RN the 2 Services are poles apart in their interpretation of the FRI3.
The RAF states that the recipient must have accepted PAS to be eligible whilst the RN specifically states that the FRI is for personnel who have not been offered FTCA. Indeed the RN instruction precludes anyone from accepting FTCA during the 5 Yr continuation of Service.
Either both Services are implementing it differently or one Service has got in wrong.
The RAF states that the recipient must have accepted PAS to be eligible whilst the RN specifically states that the FRI is for personnel who have not been offered FTCA. Indeed the RN instruction precludes anyone from accepting FTCA during the 5 Yr continuation of Service.
Either both Services are implementing it differently or one Service has got in wrong.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As the regulations on pay are meant to be the same across all 3 services, which is the definitive one and are there grounds for representation particularly if the RAF version is correct?
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 58
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lynx or Lynxi? Anyway, why would you need FRI if you were on PA - thought you have to serve 5 years to reap the benifit so were not going anyway - confirm GB Ltd is broke????
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wattashame
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pa vs FRI
Having a large number of aircrew on PAS PES or FTCA is one thing, they can opt out of service at any time. The FRI guarantees service for the period stated, this allows for manning plots to be managed better, knowing when individuals can leave, might leave, can't leave. The benefits of this can be seen at Apachemanning.com or B!
FRIs are contentious, but for the treasury it is exceptional value for money.
FRIs are contentious, but for the treasury it is exceptional value for money.