Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Global Reach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2010, 16:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,391
Received 1,585 Likes on 722 Posts
Global Reach

Quote: " The missile, which was developed in the 1980s, is already "flight proven,"....

Boeing Proposes Missile With Global Reach

(March 18) -- For nearly a decade, the Pentagon has grappled with finding a way to field a weapon with the speed and range of an intercontinental ballistic missile, but without the political ramifications of launching a nuke. Now Boeing says it has the answer: a revived 1980s-era hypersonic missile that could strike anywhere in the world in less than an hour.

The company says it has a missile concept ready, and that if it gets the go-ahead and funding from the Pentagon, the weapon could be ready for fielding within 30 months. The missile, which was developed in the 1980s, is already "flight proven," Margaret Morse, Boeing's director for strategic missile systems, told reporters today at a press briefing on the company's missile defense work.

The company describes the hypersonic strike vehicle as a quick turnaround "gap filler" that could fit the Pentagon's desire for what officials call "prompt global strike," that is, the ability to strike anywhere in the world within one hour using a conventional weapon. Such a capability has been proposed as a way to strike "fleeting targets," such as a high-profile terrorist.

Currently, the only way to strike anywhere in the world in an hour or less is using nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles launched from land or submarines. Though the Pentagon has proposed swapping the nuclear warheads with conventional ones, the idea has largely foundered amid concerns that Russia would mistake any long-range ballistic missile launch for a nuclear strike.

Morse says the Boeing missile would have a very different trajectory than an ICBM and could not be mistaken for a nuclear strike. Rather, it would be launched from a solid-rocket booster with a depressed trajectory, and then the unpowered missile would maneuver to its target using only its kinetic energy.

The Boeing concept involves using a hypersonic weapon based on a 1980s-era system that was then called an advanced maneuvering re-entry vehicle.

The hypersonic missile is just one of the ideas that Boeing is pitching to the government in the hopes of making up for the expected hit in its missile defense business. With President Barack Obama's shift in missile defense strategy from a ground-based interceptor system developed by Boeing to a sea-based system, the company is poised to lose what has been a significant source of revenue.

In refocusing missile defense and canceling plans to expand the ground-based missile defense system in Europe, the administration cited the lack of an immediate long-range missile threat from countries such as Iran and North Korea.

But Boeing is also proposing a mobile two-stage ground-based missile interceptor that could be used against long-range missile threats in the event those forecasts are wrong. "It's looked at now as a hedge against the Iranian threat progressing quicker than expected," Norm Tew, the vice president for Boeing's Ground-based Midcourse Defense, said at the briefing for Boeing's mobile missile launcher idea.

The government, however, is not paying for Boeing to work on the mobile-launcher idea; the company is using its own funds. Tew said Boeing plans to test the two-stage booster this summer and then conduct an intercept test at a later date.
ORAC is online now  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 19:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would they bother when they have aurora?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 19:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhh....the SR-91. See it in Total air war...
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2010, 13:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,579
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The keyword is AMaRV. Developed late 1970s, early 80s, CNXed because it was the ultimate arms-control conversation-stopper.

Sounds like Boeing's trying to get aboard the Conventional Strike Missile (which is quietly forging ahead, not black but not publicised) and ease out LockMart's DARPA-rooted glide vehicle.

Boost glide vehicles are fun. There was the Culinary Institute of America's project back in the 1960s, called Isin... Hey, what's that black Omega doi
LowObservable is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.