Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

'Good Readable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Mar 2010, 08:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Good Readable?

Do the RAF use a different r/t readability scale to that in civilian aviation? I often hear 'good readable' used rather than Strength 4 or 5, or is this just an old (but useful) hang over from another time?
no sig is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 08:16
  #2 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
NoSig - A recent (very recent) change to our RT procedures has introduced readability 1/2/3/4/5 in line with civvy-land.
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 11:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stateside used to be "5 by 5" which mean 5 Loud and 5 clear on a 1-5 scale - this is often abbreviated to "loud and clear" which I've heard shortened further to "Lima Charlie"

I've heard many variations on this basic theme such as, "weak but readable" and others.

I think the concept is universal....
US Herk is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 11:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I've heard many variations on this basic theme
"Gotcha cloudy beer!"

"Copyin' ya wall to wall 'n tree top tall"

"Checkin' in at three five oh 'n lookin' for ride reports....."

Unfortunately the 'informal' quality of RT in the US does encourage such comedians.

And are they still bleating about their $odding rounders scores on 123.45?
BEagle is online now  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 13:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do the RAF use a different r/t readability scale to that in civilian aviation? I often hear 'good readable' used rather than Strength 4 or 5, or is this just an old (but useful) hang over from another time?
The army use a slightly different version of r/t procedures which have been adopted by some of the RAF (90SU). Maybe this is where the "confusion" lies, maybe.
MATELO is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 13:38
  #6 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"loud and clear" which I've heard shortened further to "Lima Charlie"
I never really understood that as the former has 3 syllables and the latter "shortened" version has 4. Kind of like saying "double-you double-you double-you" instead of "world wide web".
PTT is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 16:24
  #7 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
IIRC we used to use strength but given we didn't have a strength meter it was judged more meaningful to call it as it was - weak, readable - rather than 4 - 2 which would require a look up at either end to see which number was most appropriate.

I guess a numerical code might be easier for non-native English speakers to use.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 16:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere sunny
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely it either "Loud and clear" or "Say again"
Rotax is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 16:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: In the land of snow and hockey
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 by 2

Too loud too often
Nowthen is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 17:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South West
Age: 74
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
after 35 glorious years on Hercules and Sea Kings, it is all "Say again"!
lurkposition is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 17:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PTT
I never really understood that as the former has 3 syllables and the latter "shortened" version has 4.
Because it sounds cooler!
US Herk is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 17:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
after 35 glorious years on Hercules and Sea Kings, it is all "Say again"!


Well said..... Much the same in the Lynx.... Its generally "What did he say"? "Did you hear that" ?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2010, 11:28
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
How about the dreaded "words twice" or "I read back"

We had the latter when we filed an airborne flight plan; never again!
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2010, 12:47
  #14 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because it sounds cooler!
It really, really doesn't
PTT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.