Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

OASC 'CANDIDATES' and WANNABES, PLEASE READ THIS THREAD FIRST!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

OASC 'CANDIDATES' and WANNABES, PLEASE READ THIS THREAD FIRST!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Mar 2007, 17:09
  #1001 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OASC height restrictions for aircrew?

Hi everyone,

This is my first post on Pprune but i've been reading your discussions on here for over a year now. The advice you give is invaluable to "wannabes" like me who have always wanted to be a pilot in the RAF, so I hoped you guys could help me with a slight dilemma.

Last year I went to OASC and was succesful in gaining a Sixth Form Scholarship for the branch of pilot. However, I was told that I had only just managed to pass the medical as my buttock to knee measurement was only just within the boundaries (by 5mm!)

I have to return to Cranwell next month to complete the full selection process. Therefore, my question is this: If I have exceeded the height limit - even only by 1 or 2mm - does this mean I would fail the medical? If I perform well in other areas (e.g. the interview/aptitude etc) would the RAF take this into consideration? Or are these restrictions finite?

Any advice will be much appreciated,

Dan
Vil Volentibus Arduu is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2007, 20:41
  #1002 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan

I had exactly same thing when I went through - meant I couldn't fit in a buccaneer!
If you are within the limit, then you are in, that's why they have the limits. But if they insist on re-measuring you, just make sure you really force yourself back into the seat to make sure the appropriate length is at its minimum - ooh err...

2P
2port is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2007, 21:00
  #1003 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You could ask to be winched out of the aircraft to check measurements. For instance buttock-knee may be the limiting factor on the Harrier while functional reach is defined by a particularly hard to reach switch on the Jag etc etc, they don't just invent random limits. If a winch-out proves you fit the real aircraft then you are good to go.

Not sure how easy this will be to arrange as an OASC applicant but it has been done for serving aircrew swapping types for service reasons.

In any event I wouldn't worry too much. 5mm is plenty spare, it's almost half a centimetre
Stuff is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 17:53
  #1004 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burton-on-Trent
Age: 36
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello, just a quick question I need answering if you guys would be so kind. I have my filter interview coming up very shortly and just need clarification as to how many serving RAF personnel I will be interviewed by, is it just the one or is there a board?
Adski is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 18:12
  #1005 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Does it matter?

At OASC a board is 2. There are many more AFCO than OASC boards. It would not be more at a filter interview.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 20:02
  #1006 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Adski - I'd be very surprised if any interview at the AFCO involved more than one interviewer. That's the way the RN do it, and I doubt the RAF has people to spare.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2007, 11:20
  #1007 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wilts
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adski

At the AFCO you have an intro chat with a SNCO and the interview is one on one with the OC - it will be a Fg Off or Flt Lt. COs used to be Admin branch but can now be any.
TonkaEngO is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2007, 11:42
  #1008 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
FWIW the RN now don't call it a filter interview. So long as you have the min educational reqs. for the branch they have to let you attend AIB. The initial interview is an info gathering exercise only, and the officer completes a report which is forwarded to AIB.

The report is purely factual, and the interviewer is not asked or allowed to put any subjective info or personal views on the applicant.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2007, 18:46
  #1009 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burton-on-Trent
Age: 36
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pontius Navigator - Yes it does matter to me, I just want to be as prepared as possible. Fail to prepare, preapare to fail.

Airbourne artist/TonkaEngo - Thankyou very much for your replies, they are very much appreciated.
Adski is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 15:47
  #1010 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do new recruits have a say in which type of aircraft they will eventually fly?
mike172 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 15:58
  #1011 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Mike, indeed they do. Just the system takes no notice

You will be posted to the aircraft type for which you show most aptitude or the type where there is the greatest requirement.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 16:06
  #1012 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, fast reply, thanks PN!

How do they test your aptitude in relation to aircraft type?
I suppose having a PPL (A) would pretty much rule out being posted on a heli?!
mike172 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 16:14
  #1013 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
No, a ppl counts for zilch.

They test your aptitude by teaching you to fly. You may be 'so good' during EFT that they re-stream you to WSO(N) or even Flt Ops.

If you are a natural, have loads of spare capacity, and able to assimlate training quickly you might go straight to Harrier or Typhoon. If your flying is methodical, uninspiring but safe then you may find yourself assigned to something more agricultural. I won't suggest what as it might offend.

However an Argosy was likened to a wheel barrow. Go figure.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 16:50
  #1014 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
OASC 'CANDIDATES' and WANNABES, PLEASE READ THIS THREAD FIRST!

I suppose having a PPL (A) would pretty much rule out being posted on a heli?!
If anything a PPL causes more problems than it solves. The RAF and the RN (can't speak for the green slime) probably prefer to start from scratch and teach their way. A PPL holder might think he/she is God's gift and need to re-learn, which can be hard.

I had 40 hours when I joined, and I can honestly say it was a waste of money.

Just as well it was the RAF who gave me that flying scholarship
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 17:51
  #1015 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ungrateful ***

You can't say you didn't enjoy it though.
I did, so much so that I did the right thing and joined the Dark Blue
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 19:20
  #1016 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just came across this article on pilot training while searching on google:
http://education.independent.co.uk/c...icle330383.ece

"Although RAF pilots are strictly graduates only..."

What? since when!?

Got me thinking though, what is the ratio of RAF pilots who went to uni, compared with those who didn't?
mike172 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 19:32
  #1017 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stornoway
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Non Commissioned Aircrew

Hi Guys,

Was looking for a bit of advice. I last went through OASC in Jan 2004 for WSOp but was unsuccessful and told to re-apply the following year, I didn't and joined the Civvie Police, where I've been since. The problem is that I've still kept an interest in life in the RAF and am in a bit of a quandry with what to do with myself. The thought of joining as 'rearcrew' is something that I can't shake. I wouldn't want to go through life thinking 'what-if'

I get the distinct feeling from the threads that the job isn't what it used to be, and in the same way the Police is, there is too much red-tape and internal politics up against everyone. If I decide to pack up and re-apply, what can I reasonably expect to happen?

I'm in no doubt the reality of overseas operations and the possiblity of being involved in a conflict. Should I pack up my life, house and fiancee' and go for it? Or is it a young/single man/womans game?

Just for your info, i'm 26 live in the North Of Scotland and was in the UAS at uni ( albeit that was 5 years ago and probably have forgotten which hand to salute with)!

I would appreciate any advice going.

Thanks

TF
thefonz is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 19:33
  #1018 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I am not sure of the numbers but you can get a feel by looking at the commissioning graduation lists published in the Daily Telegraph Court and Social. It lists graduates by rank, branch, and degrees.

A significant number of pilot graduates have BEng. A significant number dstined for the Admin Sec have LLB. There is a not insignificant number of acting pilot officer graduates too. I would hazard a guess at 60-40.

The non graduate (ie school leaver) brings youth and ability whereas the unversity graduate brings experience. The youth is often more malleable than the graduate.

If you can impress at OASC, improve during IOT and absorb what is taught at FTS you will have no problems.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 19:48
  #1019 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PN,

Once again, thanks.

I'll do a bit of research and see what I come up with!
mike172 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 20:01
  #1020 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The RAF went all-graduate crazy in the 80s, ISTR.

The RN had also been quite keen - all those skills learned late at night writing essays would make excellent staff officer material.

The Falklands had an interesting impact though. Quite a few of the bright, sociable, well-educated younger officers went to pieces in the battle, while the slightly dull, ordinary guys stuck to the task, carried on, and showed what they were made of. A number of careers slowed to a halt post 1982.
airborne_artist is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.