Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

SAR Cover Increasing? Safety over money for a change!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

SAR Cover Increasing? Safety over money for a change!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2009, 22:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: As close to beer as humanly possible
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may be mistake but I think that Gannet SAR flight (The UK's busiest SAR Flight) have 2 Aircraft and 4 crews....sometimes 3 1/2 crews
Sometimes significantly less than that!

The whole plan seems to be based on historical statistics. Generally speaking, Chivenor gets a reasonable number of Med-Transfers during the night, together with a few searches, but not many immediate life saving jobs. However, they do get the rare high profile long range night rescues and major incidents.

The long range rescues will go to Culdrose when the fleet it unified and I think the major incidents will be taken on risk.
Donna K Babbs is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 23:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that you are absolutely right.

I have good friends who work for Portland and Lee SAR and they all agree that it is perfectly possible to run a SAR flight with one aircraft. The Lee aircraft has a 100% servicability rate this year and last year it was down for 90 minutes...throughout the entire year....they achieve all of that with either 1 or maybe 2 engineers. If you go to Portland SAR flight tomorrow there will be 5/6 people there....thats it. If you go to 771 at Culdrose tomorrow there will be close to 100 people there (Unfair comparison I know but it makes the stats look good).
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 05:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Vec - their aircraft is brand new, doesn't do as many hours and hasn't been available for night wet winching due to the lack of suitable lighting and uncleared autopilot modes - not exactly the shining example of how it should be done. Your friends will also doubtless tell you what an awful working environment the contractors have provided with everything focussed on profit by reducing costs.

Gannet haven't had a second standby for a long while because they are undermanned (primarily rearcrew I believe) and, as yet, they haven't been required to comply with the EU WTD as the military were seeking exemptions - none given!

5.7 crews is what I believe is the actual figure for 1 aircraft on 24/7 SAR cover as required by our EU masters.

Donna - when Culdrose are on a long ranger at night post SARH, there will be no SAR cover for the whole of the SW - the nearest flights will be Valley or Lee - you might be happy to take that at risk but it ignores the very high probability that lives will be lost. I guess you are saying that searching for people in trouble isn't important then, nor is taking critically ill people to hospital - only immediate lifesaving counts, perleease
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 08:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when Culdrose are on a long ranger at night post SARH, there will be no SAR cover for the whole of the SW - the nearest flights will be Valley or Lee - you might be happy to take that at risk but it ignores the very high probability that lives will be lost. I guess you are saying that searching for people in trouble isn't important then, nor is taking critically ill people to hospital - only immediate lifesaving counts, perleease
You will never be able to provide a service which covers everywhere at all times. The primary driver with this project has to be cost not lives. I would love to be able to afford a car which had 50 air bags in it so that it protects my family should the worse happen...but I can't afford it and so I take it on risk that the car with 4 air bags will have to suffice.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 12:06
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Not quite where I'd like to be
Age: 65
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vec, even with your usual jaundiced outlook, that posting has to take the biscuit. The whole purpose of an organisation set up to save life is......wait for it..... to save life. If it was a matter of cost, I can think of an immediate solution to save the entire cost of the project, as I'm sure you could. By the way, if you're prepared to take the risk with 4 airbags, I've had another brainwave - zero airbags should save you even more. Of course if you, like me, value your life and those of your loved ones, perhaps you should just bite the bullet and invest?
sargs is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 13:41
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Genius vec - absolute genius



I know, lets get rid of all the ambulances - that will save the NHS a fortune and we'll let sick people make their own way to hospital.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 18:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are of course absolutely correct and I apologise for getting it wrong. Lives are much more important. It was a mistake on my part and for that I can only offer my most humble apologies.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 08:21
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Coast
Age: 79
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crab
This 12 hour manning is temporary and nothing to do with the SARH planned reduction in SAR service post 2012 which will see Portland, Chivenor and Boulmer reduced to 12 hour cover PERMANENTLY in order to save the contractors money.
Portland has always been 12 hr cover, not as you suggest above, reducing to 12hr.

spr
sapper is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 16:50
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Portland has always been 12 hr cover, not as you suggest above, reducing to 12hr
Not so my friend. It used to be SR-SS.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 17:39
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Sapper - yes it will retain its 12 hour status post 2012 which still leaves the rather bizarre situation where one flight (Lee) has to cover the whole of the Channel from Dover to Plymouth at night if Chiv is down to 12 hour cover.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 07:48
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the reduced manning affect the number assets the SARF was able to field in Cumbria last night?
Would it be any different post SARH?
Fingers crossed for the missing Police Officer.
extpwron is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 08:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to BBC news website there were 5 RAF sea kings involved. Assuming the reports to be accurate (and I'm sure crab@ will happily inform us once he has saved everyone ) then that is an excellent response from an organisation that is suffering from reduced manpower and I believe is not operating second standby crews at present either.

I believe too that the RAF Valley SAR helo is on reduced operating hours at the moment with a crew away in the Falklands so to get 5 aircraft there from the other bases is good going.

As an aside did the RN SAR helo from Prestwick get involved too? There seems no mention of it but of course the press may have got it slightly wrong and included it as a RAF one
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 08:37
  #33 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is an excellent response from an organisation that is suffering from reduced manpower
It is indeed , the boys (and girls?) have pulled it off again, however I'm afraid the Govt will use this as proof positive that it's reduced manning idea works, to the future detrement of the SAR Force.

I look forward to Crab's views.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 10:07
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: devon
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Per SARF Commander on BBC News SKs were sent from Valley, Leconfield, Boulmer and Chivenor. Hmm, aren't two of those slated to go to 12 hrs?!

Good work guys and girls.
arandcee is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 13:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 55
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an aside did the RN SAR helo from Prestwick get involved too? There seems no mention of it but of course the press may have got it slightly wrong and included it as a RAF one
BBC Scottish news pages are reporting it rescued someone from a car near Kelso so they've been busy too.
StuartP is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 16:09
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm, aren't two of those slated to go to 12 hrs?!
Indeed so. Therefore, to get 5 helos to Cumbria at night under SAR-H, you'd have to use Valley, Prestwick, Leconfield, Wattisham and Lossiemouth - leaving no available helicopter between the English Channel and the Outer Hebrides! There's progress for you...

It's a good thing that major flooding events are so rare these days
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 17:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Yes let's see the SARH blueprint applied to this situation!!!!!

But it's OK, the powers that be keep chanting the same mantra about how newer, faster helicopters mean you can provide the same cover with fewer assets - and it's bollocks - the fastest helicopter in the world can't be in two places at once and when an asset with a huge operational area is tasked, it leaves an even huger area with no cover.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopter rescue teams notch up a record 400 missions - Times Online

Good work chaps (and Lady)
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 16:51
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A geniune question as I am not trying to detract from the great work done by the crews at Gannet but could someone in the know give a break down of how many of those 400 'missions' were hospital transfers or medical evacuations from the Islands to mainland hospitals?

Thank you.

SW

ps Is the new Navy rank of Aircrewman Corporal the start of SAR-H harmonisation??
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 17:42
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how many of those 400 'missions' were hospital transfers or medical evacuations from the Islands to mainland hospitals?
Most of them


Is the new Navy rank of Aircrewman Corporal the start of SAR-H harmonisation??
No, He is a Bootneck.
vecvechookattack is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.