Sentry to the Skies
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sentry to the Skies
Today, ZH106 an E-3D Sentry AEW Mk1 of the RAF flew for the first time since the airframe suffered significant damage in Jan 07 when a towing rig jumped its chocks during a storm and collided with the aircraft. The repairs, costing around £3 million, have involved many different organisations worldwide.
A big 'well done' to all those involved in the repair process. Top job
Target Lock: E-3 Sentry : Service: Royal Air Force
see half way down the page for details of damage.
A big 'well done' to all those involved in the repair process. Top job
Target Lock: E-3 Sentry : Service: Royal Air Force
see half way down the page for details of damage.
Last edited by shawshank; 2nd Sep 2009 at 18:49. Reason: to apease the cornish fella
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They sound like a crack bunch of engineers.
My driver's window on my car is playing up and struggles to wind down fully. If I drop it off over at 8 Sqn, is there any chance..?
My driver's window on my car is playing up and struggles to wind down fully. If I drop it off over at 8 Sqn, is there any chance..?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mostly here, but often there
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it fixed by the same top bunch of engineers that came up with the bright idea of building a 'towing dummy' out of girders and then failing to secure it during a particularly breezy day, thereby causing damage to 2 Sentrys?
Just wondered?
Just wondered?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Troll alert
Just noticed that Cornish Stormrider has not posted here, but it seems our regular troll has
So, ignoring idiots with nothing useful to add, I was surprised at the speed of the repair.
So, ignoring idiots with nothing useful to add, I was surprised at the speed of the repair.
The somewhat pathetic utterances of the troll have now been binned!
It is good to learn that a much-needed RAF asset is now flying again. But what a shame such an avoidable event happened in the first place.....
It is good to learn that a much-needed RAF asset is now flying again. But what a shame such an avoidable event happened in the first place.....
Well, I was quite shocked at the time taken for the repairs.
I have seen double Cabin Door Formers replaced quicker - a specialised job that required new drawings and specially made Formers.
I can only assume that someone had slowed down this repair process for economic purposes?
At a commercial MRO this type of repair (baggage trucks through skins) could have been conducted within a few months - subject to Hangar floor load availability.
So what was the delay?
An ex-431MU Rigga
I have seen double Cabin Door Formers replaced quicker - a specialised job that required new drawings and specially made Formers.
I can only assume that someone had slowed down this repair process for economic purposes?
At a commercial MRO this type of repair (baggage trucks through skins) could have been conducted within a few months - subject to Hangar floor load availability.
So what was the delay?
An ex-431MU Rigga
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Speed" of repair!
B'stormer, Speed of repair...are you taking the urine?
I have been involved with repairs of similar magnitude, and the entire process (decide on course of action, consult manufacturer for one-off repair scheme, get scheme, do it) all done and aerodyne back in the air in less time than this crowd took to decide who would do it. This took the best part of 3 years! Something has gone horribly wrong.
I have been involved with repairs of similar magnitude, and the entire process (decide on course of action, consult manufacturer for one-off repair scheme, get scheme, do it) all done and aerodyne back in the air in less time than this crowd took to decide who would do it. This took the best part of 3 years! Something has gone horribly wrong.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,569
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes
on
31 Posts
I understand that the towing rig didn't just bend the skin (and puncture the pressurised hull)... It also hit some fuel lines that leaked into a major power distribution box loaded with capton (sp?) wire. Therefore repair had to be made to several aircraft systems including the replacement of over 25 miles of wiring looms that had to be hand made.
T'was a big and v expensive job with money that we don't have.
T'was a big and v expensive job with money that we don't have.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Where the heart belongs
Age: 55
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
AS Wensleydale has alluded to, this was no easy fix. I had the pleasure of sitting through the presentation about the repair, the St Athan airframe guys did some sterling work, 4 frames had to be repaired, lots of problems getting the aircraft to sit still on it's jacks whilst the repairs were carried out (the mini earthquake didn't help), lots of fuel damage to wiring and avionics and believe it or not the most difficult part was sourcing a replacement ground refuelling panel (found in a scrap yard in America)
So, I now get the impression that it wasn't the "Aircraft" systems that caused the delays - Fuel & Hyd Lines, Elect distribution, Radio & Radar systems are normal issues for many repairs.
I now feel the "Role Equipment" systems that were in that area may have caused the problem by causing a greater deal of Loom replacements - and at the very same time that Airbus was paying a lot more for Electrical Connies too?
Still it should be alright now! eh?
Rigga
I now feel the "Role Equipment" systems that were in that area may have caused the problem by causing a greater deal of Loom replacements - and at the very same time that Airbus was paying a lot more for Electrical Connies too?
Still it should be alright now! eh?
Rigga