Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

AirTanker Civilian Pilots

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

AirTanker Civilian Pilots

Old 3rd Apr 2009, 11:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AirTanker Civilian Pilots

From AirTanker website:

AirTanker will employ its own A330-200 type qualified pilots who will operate the aircraft when they are on the civil register. This group will include a number of instructors and examiners who will be responsible for the type and air transport line training of RAF pilots.

Civil pilots employed by AirTanker will also be Sponsored Reservists. They will undertake regular training with the RAF in both military and tanker operations. Sponsored Reservists can be “Called Out” by the Ministry of Defence for permanent service alongside regular RAF personnel to provide a surge capability.
What is a "sponsored reservist"?

Thanks
Flashdance9 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 12:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
The Sponsored Reserve concept enables the Ministry of Defence to enter into a defence contract on condition that an agreed element of the contractor's workforce has a reserve liability. These Reservists can be trained and called out to undertake the contracted task as members of the Armed Forces.
Instructor, Examiner and with a call-out liability? I imagine that would mean a somewhat higher salary than a basic A330 airline captain might expect to receive?
BEagle is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 13:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a house(with wheels)
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Army did a similar thing with their Osh Kosh tank transporters.
Some Serving personnel but mostly civies that can deploy.
I guess it's a bit like being a retained fire man?
bythebackdoor is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instructor, Examiner and with a call-out liability? I imagine that would mean a somewhat higher salary than a basic A330 airline captain might expect to receive?
I suppose that depends on your motives. I would take a salary below the market rate for an A330 captain or FO for the honour, pleasure, fun and satisfaction of being in the reserves again.
CirrusF is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Very laudable; however, I suspect you may well be in the minority.
BEagle is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
I seem to recall 101 at Brize had a VC10 Flight Engineer who was well into his 60's before he finally retired. On that basis can I apply for a job down the back? Not sure if this is probe and drogue but if not I'm sure I could learn to fly a boom. One thing though, my flying suits seem to have shrunk, so I may need some new ones.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This doesn’t add much to the discussion; but offered for what it’s worth. Ministry of Defence | Defence News | Equipment and Logistics | Progress made in Future Aircraft programme



As regards Sponsored Reserves; Categories of Reservists - Volunteer, Full-time, High Readiness, & Sponsored Reservists
and
House of Commons - Defence - First Report
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 15:52
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the info on sponsored reservists.

So as an AirTanker civilian 'copilot' in normal day to day operations you would be flying pax around europe as an A330 First Officer.

Then when the UK goes to war, you get called up, and become "Flying Officer", flying military transport/tanker missions?

I take it there is still a 900hr/yr flying limit?

Staff travel benefits!?
Flashdance9 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 17:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From GBZ's photo can we take it that the RAF version of the KC330 will not have the new Airbus designed boom - so will our new tanker not be able to help USAF aircraft?

Also is it the case that the RAF KC330 will not have the ability to be refuelled itself? (I saw some quote that it had enough range without refuelling capability) But didn't the version offered to the USAF recently have this capability?
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 17:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 858
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
No boom for RAF tankers and no probe either. A probe was discussed early on but was decided the range didn't warrant it.

Sponsored Reserve engineers too.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 17:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks SM.

Any idea what the Oz version will have. And the version being offered to the Armee de l'Air
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 17:49
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
RAAF version is the KC-30A.
  • Wing AAR pods - yes
  • Boom - yes
  • Able to receive fuel - yes
  • Private Finance Initiative service - NO

Same for the KC-45A for the USAF. Although I'm not sure whether that'll have a centreline drogue as well - I don't think so.
BEagle is online now  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 19:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks BEagle.

Is the Brit version equipped with a centreline drogue? (Not shown on the photo)

So in true British tradition (miltary and civilian) we are not getting the best aircraft. We get a bean counter option

Surely the best option set up is :

Wing AAR pods - yes
Boom - yes
Able to receive fuel - yes (probe & receptacle)
Centre Line Drogue - yes

That way all "allied" aircraft can be serviced
beerdrinker is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2009, 23:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The KC-45 design does include a centre-line hose; the KC-30A not so, as deemed not required.

So when does Airtanker start recruiting these A330-200 type qualified AAR instructors? And from where will they come?

I'd also be interested to see the agreed security screening requirements for sponsored reservists.

It could be a great gig though - even better if there was a receiver capability - but thrashing around a North Sea towline fo a living without pulling SDO, station 540, Mess Ents committee, Brown-nosing or JPA in one's spare time. Hell, I might even send in my CV; in about 5 years
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 07:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: neither here nor there
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anyone thinks it'd be a lovely flying job without the Brize career crawling influence they'll be sadly wrong. Or if there's any civilian 'bucket n spade' flying with it either.
Lionel Lion is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 07:45
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ministry of Defence | Fact Sheets | Project Factsheets | Future Stategic Tanker Aircraft (FSTA) Questions & Answers

Q. How many refuelling points will FSTA have?
A. All FSTA aircraft will be capable of at least twin point refuelling, from underwing pods, five will in addition have a centreline Hose Drum Unit for refuelling Large Aircraft – but not simultaneously with use of the underwing pods
Presumably, they will be the core "inventory" with the 2 Point only machines being the commercial mooonlighters?

Will the "moonlighters" have stick on/peel off markings (roundel, flash, serial No/Reg letters)?
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 12:05
  #17 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wonder how they will handle the physical security of the moonlighters and the crews when parked overnight at some costa-del-middle of nowhere? Or will they always return to Blighty each night? And how will foriegn airports take to having a military marked aircraft ('are you sure those things under the wings aren't missiles?') milling about the pan? Hope someone somewhere has had a thouight or two?!
 
Old 4th Apr 2009, 17:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Will the "moonlighters" have stick on/peel off markings (roundel, flash, serial No/Reg letters)?
That'd keep the spotters guessing...!!

Maybe they'll just have no identification markings except tiny little national markings. Like a certain nation's jets which didn't land in the UK... Of course not. Absolutely not...
BEagle is online now  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 19:43
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 858
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
Surely the best option set up is :

Wing AAR pods - yes
Boom - yes
Able to receive fuel - yes (probe & receptacle)
Centre Line Drogue - yes

That way all "allied" aircraft can be serviced
Why would the RAF pay for a boom that they don't use, just on the off chance that an "allied" aircraft might be able to use it?

If there is a need for a multi - national tanker force, then NATO can set it up can't they?
Saintsman is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2009, 21:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would the RAF pay for a boom that they don't use
The RAF are not paying for it.
spheroid is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.