Defence Bullying Report
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Defence Bullying Report
Got this from Rum Ration - I dare say one of you Wags outh there will come up with an RN equivilent involving RHIB's and IPOD's 
Also been edited to include my brother and current CAS
DEFENCE BULLYING REPORT - RAF Worst of the Three Services
A recent report by the Equal Opportunities Audit Team has found that allegations of "a culture of widespread bullying and brutality" within the British Forces are, in the most part, unfounded. The audit team, which travelled to every Defence establishment across the UK and abroad and interviewed staff from all three services, found surprisingly few cases of unfair treatment and bullying within the Army and Navy.
When it came to the Airforce, however, the report told a different story.
Complaints to the EOAT came from a total of 13,555 RAF members, compared with three from Navy and just one from Army.
While this statistic is alarming in its own right, it becomes horrific when one considers that each complaint represents a sad story of abuse, mistreatment and neglect. As one senior RAF officer put it, "Each story is, in itself, a sad indictment on the RAF. When taken as a whole, however, they demonstrate a reprehensible lack of regard for personnel on the part of RAF managers at all levels."
One young pilot told of having to spend two nights in tented accommodation, despite the fact that there was an empty five-star hotel just 1km away.
Another said that he had been forced to endure a gruelling fitness test every year since he joined in 1997.
One airwoman alleged that she had been overlooked for promotion on numerous occasions, simply because she was fat, lazy and stupid.
An aircraftman stated he had been refused permission to wear civilian attire to work, despite the fact that his uniform clashed with his eye colour.
Another had been forced to wear uncomfortable safety boots for periods of up to eight hours straight.
An RAF clerk could not understand why she had been sent to work in a Joint military headquarters, "I have been forced to work for horrid Army & Navy people who just don't understand what the military is all about. I feel the RAF has victimised me by forcing me to do this...I will be seeking compensation..."
Shockingly, RAF Senior Ranks are also subject to mistreatment. One SNCO Chief Technician based at RAF Northolt stated, "I was deeply upset when I was addressed as ‘Chief Tech' by an officer. He knew my name was William. It was just horrible - I have never been more humiliated in my life." In response a senior RAF officer stated, "the officer in question has been moved on...".
A number of personnel complained of having to attend courses that were not relevant to their jobs, such as rigorous ground combat courses and drawn-out lectures on occupational health and safety. To add insult to injury, a young corporal was even ordered to pack up chairs in the classroom after one such course.
The huge backlash against treatment of Air Force personnel should provide senior officers with a vital clue with regard to the massive retention problems experienced by the RAF in recent times. Over the past two years, Defence has spent some £19.8 million looking into the issue.
Not all of the Air Force's hierarchy, however, were upset by the revelations. Said outgoing Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Glen Torpy, KCB CBE DSO ADC BSc(Eng) FRAeS RAF, "I'm delighted with the result. I am very happy that our retention problems are due, in the most part at least, to something as harmless as bullying. I thought everyone was leaving because of me"
Also been edited to include my brother and current CAS
DEFENCE BULLYING REPORT - RAF Worst of the Three Services
A recent report by the Equal Opportunities Audit Team has found that allegations of "a culture of widespread bullying and brutality" within the British Forces are, in the most part, unfounded. The audit team, which travelled to every Defence establishment across the UK and abroad and interviewed staff from all three services, found surprisingly few cases of unfair treatment and bullying within the Army and Navy.
When it came to the Airforce, however, the report told a different story.
Complaints to the EOAT came from a total of 13,555 RAF members, compared with three from Navy and just one from Army.
While this statistic is alarming in its own right, it becomes horrific when one considers that each complaint represents a sad story of abuse, mistreatment and neglect. As one senior RAF officer put it, "Each story is, in itself, a sad indictment on the RAF. When taken as a whole, however, they demonstrate a reprehensible lack of regard for personnel on the part of RAF managers at all levels."
One young pilot told of having to spend two nights in tented accommodation, despite the fact that there was an empty five-star hotel just 1km away.
Another said that he had been forced to endure a gruelling fitness test every year since he joined in 1997.
One airwoman alleged that she had been overlooked for promotion on numerous occasions, simply because she was fat, lazy and stupid.
An aircraftman stated he had been refused permission to wear civilian attire to work, despite the fact that his uniform clashed with his eye colour.
Another had been forced to wear uncomfortable safety boots for periods of up to eight hours straight.
An RAF clerk could not understand why she had been sent to work in a Joint military headquarters, "I have been forced to work for horrid Army & Navy people who just don't understand what the military is all about. I feel the RAF has victimised me by forcing me to do this...I will be seeking compensation..."
Shockingly, RAF Senior Ranks are also subject to mistreatment. One SNCO Chief Technician based at RAF Northolt stated, "I was deeply upset when I was addressed as ‘Chief Tech' by an officer. He knew my name was William. It was just horrible - I have never been more humiliated in my life." In response a senior RAF officer stated, "the officer in question has been moved on...".
A number of personnel complained of having to attend courses that were not relevant to their jobs, such as rigorous ground combat courses and drawn-out lectures on occupational health and safety. To add insult to injury, a young corporal was even ordered to pack up chairs in the classroom after one such course.
The huge backlash against treatment of Air Force personnel should provide senior officers with a vital clue with regard to the massive retention problems experienced by the RAF in recent times. Over the past two years, Defence has spent some £19.8 million looking into the issue.
Not all of the Air Force's hierarchy, however, were upset by the revelations. Said outgoing Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Glen Torpy, KCB CBE DSO ADC BSc(Eng) FRAeS RAF, "I'm delighted with the result. I am very happy that our retention problems are due, in the most part at least, to something as harmless as bullying. I thought everyone was leaving because of me"
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's from today's Telegraph and don't you let anyone tell you otherwise. Poor things, it must be so awful for them but they're being so brave about the hairstyle problems on those terrible windy airfields... 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I was to send that on to one in particular of my Grunt ex-colleagues, he'd almost certainly take it at face value and believe it to be totally genuine. Every word of it. (In all matters to do with the Air force, he had a very successful irony bypass operation many years ago.)
(pre-empting the next post from someone saying: "Well, it is, isn't it?")
Back in my day, (a long time ago now), it wasn't all that unusual to find the odd enlisted man new to the unit who'd spent his whole service life in a HQ or an AD with attitudes not far removed from the above. After a couple of weeks living in a tented camp away from the dears at HQ, in all cases that I recall, a total change would come over them as they began to feel part of the unit, and the previously Bolshie troublemaker became very much a hardworking part of the team.
Perhaps there's a lesson there for the architects of the modern so-called efficiencies that destroyed small unit servicing of aircraft and moved everything to remote major depots?
(pre-empting the next post from someone saying: "Well, it is, isn't it?")
Back in my day, (a long time ago now), it wasn't all that unusual to find the odd enlisted man new to the unit who'd spent his whole service life in a HQ or an AD with attitudes not far removed from the above. After a couple of weeks living in a tented camp away from the dears at HQ, in all cases that I recall, a total change would come over them as they began to feel part of the unit, and the previously Bolshie troublemaker became very much a hardworking part of the team.
Perhaps there's a lesson there for the architects of the modern so-called efficiencies that destroyed small unit servicing of aircraft and moved everything to remote major depots?
