RAF St. MAWGAN
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF St. MAWGAN
On December 1st Cornwall County Council is due to take over the running of the airfield including ATC from the RAF. Today at almost literally the last minute the County Council has announced they will not be ready to take over for a further three weeks and have urgently appealed to the military to come to their rescue for this interim period. In the last few minutes the BBC have posted details on their website confirming that the RAF are unable to help and hence it appears the airfield will close for three weeks.
You couldn't really make it up, could you? Never underestimate the ability of a County Council - particularly Cornwall - to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Local TV tonight referred to the Council having had four years to prepare for taking over the facilities at the airfield. A County Councillor described it as unfortunate but not a disaster
It seems it has been too big a task for the County Council with its 22000 staff led by its new £200K a year Chief Exec.
Looking ahead, many locals have memories of St. Mawgan going back decades. The extensive facilities there with several useful hangars including the large modern structure used for Nimrod maintenance and later for Sea Kings is surely crying out for a new role, there is plenty of parking, the HAS site as well as the relatively large domestic site all surely are deserving of a future role probably outside the military orbit.
I read with interest the recent comments on Macrihanish, any pruners out threre got any ideas on the way ahead for St. Mawgan?
I appreciate, that for the moment the Maritime Facility and SERE are still at the Station. But for how long?
And what about the gorgeous Shackelton gate guard?
You couldn't really make it up, could you? Never underestimate the ability of a County Council - particularly Cornwall - to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Local TV tonight referred to the Council having had four years to prepare for taking over the facilities at the airfield. A County Councillor described it as unfortunate but not a disaster
It seems it has been too big a task for the County Council with its 22000 staff led by its new £200K a year Chief Exec.
Looking ahead, many locals have memories of St. Mawgan going back decades. The extensive facilities there with several useful hangars including the large modern structure used for Nimrod maintenance and later for Sea Kings is surely crying out for a new role, there is plenty of parking, the HAS site as well as the relatively large domestic site all surely are deserving of a future role probably outside the military orbit.
I read with interest the recent comments on Macrihanish, any pruners out threre got any ideas on the way ahead for St. Mawgan?
I appreciate, that for the moment the Maritime Facility and SERE are still at the Station. But for how long?
And what about the gorgeous Shackelton gate guard?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This project has been one long screw up and the companies involved should be ashamed of their inability to deliver within the timescales. However, to be at least a little fair, this has not been last minute it has been obvious for some time that the final CAA approval would be right up against the 1st december deadline. Glad the RAF have pulled out, might save a few souls having to work Xmas should the deadline slip again.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not just local councils. Being a little parochial, anyone remember the Boscombe Down ATC fiasco in 1990?
Let me refresh.
Organisation A lost the contract and was given x months notice. Company B won the contract and part of the deal was that organisation A would train company B's controllers. Three days or so before handover, everyone threw their hands in the air and said "too difficult" (I wonder why). Anyway, a bit of frantic HQ MATO activity later, a motley bunch of RAF controllers get sent in over the weekend. 18 years later they are still there under a so-called "Value For Money" role.
Let me refresh.
Organisation A lost the contract and was given x months notice. Company B won the contract and part of the deal was that organisation A would train company B's controllers. Three days or so before handover, everyone threw their hands in the air and said "too difficult" (I wonder why
). Anyway, a bit of frantic HQ MATO activity later, a motley bunch of RAF controllers get sent in over the weekend. 18 years later they are still there under a so-called "Value For Money" role.
Hmmm - the download that I got was that we were there TFN. Cornwall CC needs a LOT of money to bring the airfield and services up to scratch and can't afford it coz they're broke. They've not employed anyone to take the place of the light blue suiters that are there, which in all fairness should have been apparent quite some time ago when no-one pitched up to start scoping what needed to be done.
Luvverley!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: --
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This may (or may not) answer some questions.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: EU Region 9 - apparently
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
beer call in a brewery
Fairly typical of the incompetents who spend our council tax here. 
Already missed one target date.
Only had 4 years to prepare, given that, I would consider that they do not have the co-ordination required to be onanists.
Already missed one target date.
Only had 4 years to prepare, given that, I would consider that they do not have the co-ordination required to be onanists.
Glad the RAF have pulled out
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Slightly left of centreline
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF St Mawgan is not closing. The airfield, however, will be transferred to the Council from DLA on 1 December as scheduled.
I cannot envisage a last minute change of decision by the MOD. As was mentioned in the MOD press release, the RAF personnel currently employed at St Mawgan have other posts to fill. There have already been extensions granted to the Council and RAF personnel have had their careers / personal lives etc put on hold more than once already. Bear in mind that its not just those in post at St Mawgan that are affected, it has a knock on effect throughout the branch.
I cannot envisage a last minute change of decision by the MOD. As was mentioned in the MOD press release, the RAF personnel currently employed at St Mawgan have other posts to fill. There have already been extensions granted to the Council and RAF personnel have had their careers / personal lives etc put on hold more than once already. Bear in mind that its not just those in post at St Mawgan that are affected, it has a knock on effect throughout the branch.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and with their bow ties a spinnin, Cornwall County Council will carry on and screw up.............................next ( insert project of choice)
What many of you don't know is that RAF Holiday Camp West is in the borough of restormel council. They are the local authority with CCC over them on more strategic screw up's. Restormel are reknown throughout the land as the most crooked and incompetent going. I have spoken with workers of many engineering and construction firms and they all say that they avoid Restormel like the plague. Twas hinted to me that planning decisions are based on envelopes, brown, plain, stuffed with BBT (big beer tokens).
It would not suprise me at all to find restormel's hand in this snafu.....
What many of you don't know is that RAF Holiday Camp West is in the borough of restormel council. They are the local authority with CCC over them on more strategic screw up's. Restormel are reknown throughout the land as the most crooked and incompetent going. I have spoken with workers of many engineering and construction firms and they all say that they avoid Restormel like the plague. Twas hinted to me that planning decisions are based on envelopes, brown, plain, stuffed with BBT (big beer tokens).
It would not suprise me at all to find restormel's hand in this snafu.....
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stormrider, personally I'd remove your last as being a bit too close to slander.
The truth of the story is simple, the navaids provider have failed to get their equipment cerified in time. They have had huge problems writing safety cases that CAA would accept. Once all the paperwork has been completed CAA will visit the site and give it the final once over (including some technical checks on the kit). Then they go home to Gatwick and issue the letter clearing the kit for us. I believe the date for their visit will be around the 18th/19th december. So if (and that's quite a big if) the job has been done propoerly then 19th should be good. Wouldn't be at all surprised to see the airport going live minus some bits of kit.
The truth of the story is simple, the navaids provider have failed to get their equipment cerified in time. They have had huge problems writing safety cases that CAA would accept. Once all the paperwork has been completed CAA will visit the site and give it the final once over (including some technical checks on the kit). Then they go home to Gatwick and issue the letter clearing the kit for us. I believe the date for their visit will be around the 18th/19th december. So if (and that's quite a big if) the job has been done propoerly then 19th should be good. Wouldn't be at all surprised to see the airport going live minus some bits of kit.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF St Mawgan is not closing
Its sort of closing though isn't it..... I mean..the MATZ has gone.... you can't get any fuel there....and the feeder has closed....so, although technically the RAF flag may fly from the rusty yard arm....its not really an RAF airfield is it.....
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Slightly left of centreline
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct, as from Monday there will no longer be an RAF airfield at St Mawgan. However, the domestic site remains and that is still known as RAF St Mawgan. Purely pedantic I know, but true!
The MATZ has not gone, for a couple of days anyway, and you can get fuel, you just have to go north side to the civilian terminal, and there never was a feeder! More pedantry!
One of the RAFs best bases in my opinion, and I am sorry to see it go.
The MATZ has not gone, for a couple of days anyway, and you can get fuel, you just have to go north side to the civilian terminal, and there never was a feeder! More pedantry!
One of the RAFs best bases in my opinion, and I am sorry to see it go.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For once, I think the RAF/MoD have done the right thing by basically telling the Council to get stuffed. After all these years, the RAF's been treated as a convenient money-spinner and after the way in which the JSF saga was handled, I think they've done the right thing by just walking away. It's a terrible shame to lose such a big and well-equipped airfield in a strategic position, but in some respects it would be quite gratifying if the airfield closed completely and the Council lost a whole lot of cash - it would serve them right.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stormrider, personally I'd remove your last as being a bit too close to slander
So I wouldn't worry too much.
The great Mike Robertson (Trago Mills) wrote about Restormel Council frequently in terms much more explicit and perjorative than in this thread, in a paragraph at the top of Trago's full-page adverts. We miss his missives deeply. His bete noir was the Restormel Planning Department which was notoriously corrupt, and probably still is. Somehow they never thought a case against him would be worthwhile; see the sentence above, ending "if untrue". Mike knew where the skeletons were buried, and the Council knew he knew.
In contrast, Cornwall CC is probably simply totally incompetent rather than crooked, ignoring the daily, endemic minor corruption in all Local Authorities, and has joined a large number of Councils in finding out that paying huge salaries, bonuses and, eventually of course large pay-offs for failure, to recycled time-servers in senior positions from other Local Authorities achieves nothing except a waste of shed-loads of ratepayers' funds.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: cornwall
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats it!!
Hi to you all, Well thats it, RAF St Mawgan ( the active side) has closed for ever, the last flight Swallow 469A, a Dash 8 from Air South West took off from runway 12 at 22.40hrs 30th Nov 2008 enroute Plymouth:
, now its up to the CCC to make Newquay ( should still be St Mawgan, its not in bloody Newquay) work, gonna be interesting, as, if you put them all in a bag you would have a hell of a job to pull out a good one
all the best to any body going to work for them.
, now its up to the CCC to make Newquay ( should still be St Mawgan, its not in bloody Newquay) work, gonna be interesting, as, if you put them all in a bag you would have a hell of a job to pull out a good one all the best to any body going to work for them.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Monde
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cornwall Country Council taking over St.Mawgan must surely be another step on the road to independence. After all, they do claim to be a different nation, do they not? All they need now is the world to wake up and realise the usefulness of tin and there'll be no stopping them. 