RAF buys spy planes to monitor enemies from the sky
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bored
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Phase 1 Mantis vehicle, expected to fly in 2009, will be powered by two Rolls-Royce's RB250 turboprop engines
Maybe it is the same kit?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That Helicrew address does indeed appear to be DO Systems address. Helicrew's registered office is at Twickenham, according to their website. Same DOS telephone number as well. And they would've gotten away with it if it hadn't been for those pesky kids and that darn dog of theirs.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What does Mantis do that REAPER does not? - Given MQ-9 is doing it NOW (or so the MoD web sites will have you believe), and not in a plastic airshow mock-up or Power Point Presentation of a wind tunnel model. ....and what language will it communicate woth other aircraft / command and control / supported agencies etc,,....?
...are the Brits a little behind here or are they so novel that they are streets ahead...?
...are the Brits a little behind here or are they so novel that they are streets ahead...?
What will Mantis do that Reaper isn't doing now?
It may do nothing at all, as this is all still a matter of study contracts, and not production orders.
Whatever it does, it will do it WITHOUT spending dollars, without worsening the balance of payments deficit, and while simultaneously supporting UK industry as it breaks into what may be a vital sector. Every penny spent will generate UK tax revenue, and will support UK jobs.
Of course no military programme should be undertaken in lieu of industrial aid, but if a programme can benefit UK plc as a side effect that's great, surely?
It will do it with twin engines - which may or may not improve the loss rate.
It will do it with a brand new configuration, and not as the stretch of an ageing existing design.
It may do nothing at all, as this is all still a matter of study contracts, and not production orders.
Whatever it does, it will do it WITHOUT spending dollars, without worsening the balance of payments deficit, and while simultaneously supporting UK industry as it breaks into what may be a vital sector. Every penny spent will generate UK tax revenue, and will support UK jobs.
Of course no military programme should be undertaken in lieu of industrial aid, but if a programme can benefit UK plc as a side effect that's great, surely?
It will do it with twin engines - which may or may not improve the loss rate.
It will do it with a brand new configuration, and not as the stretch of an ageing existing design.
D-IFF Ident Said:
Zeppellins, dirigibles, airships - that's what you want. Stay up for days, and you can hang a gondola underneath, add a galley, toilet, bunks, sofa and tv. Relatively cheap as chips too; do I get 25 quid?
I'm sure that this was tongue in cheek but why not...for some roles.
Whatever happened to Airship Industries? Their Airship 500 would be ideal in a environment where there wasn't a high speed requirement.
Zeppellins, dirigibles, airships - that's what you want. Stay up for days, and you can hang a gondola underneath, add a galley, toilet, bunks, sofa and tv. Relatively cheap as chips too; do I get 25 quid?
I'm sure that this was tongue in cheek but why not...for some roles.
Whatever happened to Airship Industries? Their Airship 500 would be ideal in a environment where there wasn't a high speed requirement.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No idea what happened to Airship Industries, but there was a report that the Zeppelin is back from Cardington, albeit for civilian flights. £5,000 for a flight seems mighty expensive though.
BBC NEWS | England | Zeppelin rises in the East
BBC NEWS | England | Zeppelin rises in the East
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Asia
Age: 67
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Decoy or Target
I think the DA42 would make a lovely target or decoy. Relatively low radar signature unable to transmit much data more than 30nm. Forget the satcom link to get the bandwidth you would need a real aircraft. Its a nice NATO toy in a tactical environment, but forget the rest. Its also too difficult to maintain. Not to be used by real soldiers.
p32r,
So, what do you think of UAVs then? Because I don't see that any of your argument that you apply to the DA42 could not equally be applied to the various families of UAVs in development or service.
So, what do you think of UAVs then? Because I don't see that any of your argument that you apply to the DA42 could not equally be applied to the various families of UAVs in development or service.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Maybe it was a slightly tongue in cheek remark but a few years back I remember the Army testing an airship in Ulster for what I assume was 'sneaky beaky' type stuff.
Oh, a black Omega. Haven't seen one of those for years...
Oh, a black Omega. Haven't seen one of those for years...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Asia
Age: 67
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UAV's
You either have the "cheap" Israeli type which has the most tactical operational use with a VHF link or you go the full UAV which has the satcom link and is about the same price as a cheap fighter. (Mind you, you can pick up a cheap new fighter these days for about $5m. I was thinking of the full capable type $20m+) The comms link is always the problem and where you want to send the signal in real time. Complex systems are okay, but they need a complex support network, complex budget (=large) and can fall down quickly. You still can't beat the guy on the ground
My comment was more on the surveillance roll of the DA42. Great toy
They seem to be pushing them as cheap solutions for those countries not allowed to buy high tech solutions.............................
Maybe they just want to find out what it is like ........... 
My comment was more on the surveillance roll of the DA42. Great toy They seem to be pushing them as cheap solutions for those countries not allowed to buy high tech solutions............................. Maybe they just want to find out what it is like ...........
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, what do you think of UAVs then? Because I don't see that any of your argument that you apply to the DA42 could not equally be applied to the various families of UAVs in development or service.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Asia
Age: 67
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the aircraft/UAV is large enough it is not be an issue generally. The restricting factors are power and weight sufficient to give you realtime broadband rates in X-Band or even Ku-Band. Antenna size is an issue if the platform is too small. The solution as I mentioned is a well established UAU for local use and then the big expensive one for long range stand off. Something the size of the DA42 or similar size already has to power cameras, recorders then the transmission gear. Its probably at best very very close to the limits. Its best to remove the pilot as they are a waste of valueable real estate plus also a liability if they come down on the wrong side of the line. Hence in answer the Israeli type UAV is good for the tactic solution and leave the long range big ones to those countries who can afford them. 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: River Thames
Age: 69
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Photo
In case anyone's interested, I spied G-DOSA on a secret mission of at least 5 minutes duration outbound from Old Sarum inbound to Boscombe Down last week.
Note the lack of mods to the airframe as yet and lack of Military serial; the British Military fin flash gives a clue as to its purpose though.
It departed an hour or so later on a somewhat longer mission to the West.
Note the lack of mods to the airframe as yet and lack of Military serial; the British Military fin flash gives a clue as to its purpose though.
It departed an hour or so later on a somewhat longer mission to the West.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: River Thames
Age: 69
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
