More Tristar problems?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,879
Received 2,823 Likes
on
1,203 Posts
BEagle
In my 5000+ hours on the VC10, no-one ever drove anything into the aeroplane.
Yet over the last few years, there seem to have been some inexcusable ground incidents. It's not as though the TriStar is an infrequent visitor to Akrotiri, so is there a systemic problem - or was this a 'one-off'?
When RAF AT is at such a premium, such incidents are particularly unacceptable.
Whoever causes them.
In my 5000+ hours on the VC10, no-one ever drove anything into the aeroplane.
Yet over the last few years, there seem to have been some inexcusable ground incidents. It's not as though the TriStar is an infrequent visitor to Akrotiri, so is there a systemic problem - or was this a 'one-off'?
When RAF AT is at such a premium, such incidents are particularly unacceptable.
Whoever causes them.
Or the one after a certain crewman decided to push some steps under the fuselage so he could get in the freight bay whilst refuelling went on and I had to offload 35,000 lb of fuel to get them back out? does that not count either?
Or the tow bar that went throught the nose of a VIP?
Should I go on?
Sorry, I should have said that during 'my' 5000+, no-one drove anything into 'my' aeroplane - but I thought that was sufficiently implicit.
If SOPs are not being followed, supervisors' heads might well roll.....
If SOPs are not being followed, supervisors' heads might well roll.....
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 110 Likes
on
77 Posts
Arthur R,
Sorry, but you are wrong re the Bassett crash at Valley. Nobody was imprisoned as a result. The S.A.C liney who refuelled the aircraft engaged a civil barrister for his defence at the CM. He was acquitted as I recall as the barrister exposed what we now call systemic failure...on a large scale. I was there at the time and remember the incident well.
Sorry, but you are wrong re the Bassett crash at Valley. Nobody was imprisoned as a result. The S.A.C liney who refuelled the aircraft engaged a civil barrister for his defence at the CM. He was acquitted as I recall as the barrister exposed what we now call systemic failure...on a large scale. I was there at the time and remember the incident well.
Just another erk
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 77
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Krystal n chips, I was there at the same time, but over the years the memory fades, perhaps it was the talk at the time that they could go to prison. If I remember rightly wasn't the co on the aircraft?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GONE BY 2012
Age: 51
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread drift fellas
More importantly if these 2 Tristars are grounded for any lenght of time how are we going to maintain the airbridge?
What about the Telic/Herrick RIPs and the scheduled sorties?
Not a hope of the C130 fleet being able to assist - it's broken
Civil charter won't get you into theatre - British personnel on non-DAS equipped aircraft - no-one in their right mind would sign that off
Can't wait for next week's trip to the sandpit (again)
More importantly if these 2 Tristars are grounded for any lenght of time how are we going to maintain the airbridge?
What about the Telic/Herrick RIPs and the scheduled sorties?
Not a hope of the C130 fleet being able to assist - it's broken
Civil charter won't get you into theatre - British personnel on non-DAS equipped aircraft - no-one in their right mind would sign that off
Can't wait for next week's trip to the sandpit (again)
With the Trial Installation of the TriStar cockpit upgrade not due out of the hangar until 2009 and with FSTA due to enter service from 2011, how long will the expensively modified TriStars actually remain in service?
I do hope that it'll prove to be £22M well spent.........
Is the simulator also being modified?
I do hope that it'll prove to be £22M well spent.........
Is the simulator also being modified?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
skaterboi:
Funny...reminds me of the time I watched a RAF C17 being 'wing-walked' into the tail of an EA6 at El Centro a few years back...sure the loadie had signalled the handling pilot to stop, but the oh so gentle application of brakes was too...oh so gentle!
If there's any doubt when I taxi my aircraft, I get wing walkers out to give me a thumbs up for good clearance. Same should apply here. There's simply no excuse for driving things into a parked aircraft.
Funny...reminds me of the time I watched a RAF C17 being 'wing-walked' into the tail of an EA6 at El Centro a few years back...sure the loadie had signalled the handling pilot to stop, but the oh so gentle application of brakes was too...oh so gentle!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which reminds me of the time where the opsies told the movers that a set of steps were a little close to the taxiway at a certain Afghan international airport. Suitable ignored, an Antonov then knocked the steps back into line. Chap had to stay back a couple of days to carry out a unit inquiry.
That may have been the same time that the movers didn't think it necessary to clear all their crap from a dispersal because helicopters were only ground taxying and therefore there was no downdraft.
That may have been the same time that the movers didn't think it necessary to clear all their crap from a dispersal because helicopters were only ground taxying and therefore there was no downdraft.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, Timmy was parked on the pan. Guilty person responsible moved said steps into stationary aircraft.
Q1. How many people were on the team moving the steps?
Q2. What speed were said steps travelling at?
Q3. Where the F£&K was the supervision?
At a time when all forces are beyond overstretch who decided that this was an ok corner to cut? What next, self signing, self supervising, non independant inspection ejection seat work?? Where I work there are certain tasks that need a certain number of people, not enough people then task not done.
There is never enough time or man power to do it right first time but we always manage to find the time and manpower to f$"king fix it. And yes, I have made a mistake or two. It's at that time the old integrity principal comes out to play. I.E. stop and report it truthfully, man up and take your punishment like a liney.
Q1. How many people were on the team moving the steps?
Q2. What speed were said steps travelling at?
Q3. Where the F£&K was the supervision?
At a time when all forces are beyond overstretch who decided that this was an ok corner to cut? What next, self signing, self supervising, non independant inspection ejection seat work?? Where I work there are certain tasks that need a certain number of people, not enough people then task not done.
There is never enough time or man power to do it right first time but we always manage to find the time and manpower to f$"king fix it. And yes, I have made a mistake or two. It's at that time the old integrity principal comes out to play. I.E. stop and report it truthfully, man up and take your punishment like a liney.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Puken
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BEags
£22m on the WHOLE fleet?
Bargain compared to the cost of a SINGLE VC10 major.
At least there'll be a return as the 3* will still be here in 2014+. 2011? Don't belive the MoD glossies!
£22m on the WHOLE fleet?
Bargain compared to the cost of a SINGLE VC10 major.
At least there'll be a return as the 3* will still be here in 2014+. 2011? Don't belive the MoD glossies!
I wouldn't disagree with that - I just hope that the idiot beancounters don't decide to scrap the TriStars before, ooh, about 2020??
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Not Really In Scotland
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SRENNAPS,
Whilst I think it's laudible of you to defend our Movements Colleagues out here, I have to say that they are in fact culpable. To put it another way, they biffed up. A silly avoidable mistake. Made more annoying by the fact that despite all that has been achieved in support of the Airbridge, all anyone will remember now is that Akrotiri bent a Tristar. Can't say anymore as I may attract unwanted attention.
Whilst I think it's laudible of you to defend our Movements Colleagues out here, I have to say that they are in fact culpable. To put it another way, they biffed up. A silly avoidable mistake. Made more annoying by the fact that despite all that has been achieved in support of the Airbridge, all anyone will remember now is that Akrotiri bent a Tristar. Can't say anymore as I may attract unwanted attention.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In the wing
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a TriStar frequent flyer I am normally the first one to criticise the Movements Empire, however, on this occasion I must support them. AKT movements have increased by 50% but unfortunately the movements team there still have the same number of personnel, a number which is woefully too few for the increase in tasking. Fatigue manifests itself in various ways; a TriStar being bent is just one way. Let us stop pointing the finger at any one individual or section. Let us start learning from our mistakes so that next time we can avoid this from happening again. Let us all remember that the people that ultimately lose out are the people in theatre. But most importantly, the airbridge may be creaking but because of the hard work of a lot of people at BZN and AKT (including the the other chaps across the road) the airbridge is still open.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manila Philippines
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
see above post....they have hit aircraft enough times to learn not to do it.
If a techie drives anywhere near an aircraft he needs a marshaler, even if he is driving the slow Grove to clean the windscreens.
Eng wing orders dictate a marshaller is required for all movements around an aircraft.
There is no excuse..and fatigue is not a valid excuse..
If a techie drives anywhere near an aircraft he needs a marshaler, even if he is driving the slow Grove to clean the windscreens.
Eng wing orders dictate a marshaller is required for all movements around an aircraft.
There is no excuse..and fatigue is not a valid excuse..
Hellbound
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no excuse..and fatigue is not a valid excuse..
I remember standing alone on a pan with the sun coming up taking in the fact that one of my techies had just written off a refuelling rig and seriously damaged a civvie airliner. Circumstances (op tempo, manning levels, working hours and importance of task) were such that it was dealt with, he never heard a thing about it and neither should he.
We don't know the circumstances so let the subsequent investigation decide if there is culpability.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bravo!!
Disagree completely, it totally depends on the strength of your will to stand up and say you are too tired to do something. One's willingness to do that depends on lots of things; quality of management/leadership above you, importance of the task, awareness of tiredness.
I remember standing alone on a pan with the sun coming up taking in the fact that one of my techies had just written off a refuelling rig and seriously damaged a civvie airliner. Circumstances (op tempo, manning levels, working hours and importance of task) were such that it was dealt with, he never heard a thing about it and neither should he.
We don't know the circumstances so let the subsequent investigation decide if there is culpability.
I remember standing alone on a pan with the sun coming up taking in the fact that one of my techies had just written off a refuelling rig and seriously damaged a civvie airliner. Circumstances (op tempo, manning levels, working hours and importance of task) were such that it was dealt with, he never heard a thing about it and neither should he.
We don't know the circumstances so let the subsequent investigation decide if there is culpability.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Guess
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
L1011GE
Don't know what part of BZZ you work at but I've never seen a teccie marshaling any vehicle of theirs near a T* or VC10. And be careful of your reply because I know they have been hit, and not just by movers or ASMT !
Mistakes happen in all walks of life, it's just one of those things. Despite all your bickering I suggest you look at the various pamphlets floating around detailing recent aircraft mishaps. Very few mover related, a lot more teccie related. But you don't see us whinging.
MM
Don't know what part of BZZ you work at but I've never seen a teccie marshaling any vehicle of theirs near a T* or VC10. And be careful of your reply because I know they have been hit, and not just by movers or ASMT !
Mistakes happen in all walks of life, it's just one of those things. Despite all your bickering I suggest you look at the various pamphlets floating around detailing recent aircraft mishaps. Very few mover related, a lot more teccie related. But you don't see us whinging.
MM