Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US Warns UK over Cluster Bomb Treaty

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US Warns UK over Cluster Bomb Treaty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2008, 14:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US Warns UK over Cluster Bomb Treaty

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...ter-bombs.html
Lazer-Hound is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 14:45
  #2 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A little overly dramatic thread title?

Hmmm, didn't see any 'warning, i.e, 'threat.'


But please, carry on.


God help your troops, the poor bastards.
 
Old 18th May 2008, 15:37
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cluster Bombs

Now for the bleedingly obvious - when are Al Queda going to play by the rules ?

Give'em everything we've got - including all politicians, that should truly rodger them if our experience is anything to go by -( except maybe Boris as he's good for a laugh )-from high altitude with pockets full of bomblets...
Double Zero is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 16:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I am aware brickhistory, all of our troops have mothers and fathers. However, I am much more sure of God's help in their quest to improve life for the Iraqis.

As far as cluster munitions go I subscribe to the Israeli opinion that they are the bad weaponeers' last desperate attempt to hit the target.
soddim is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 16:24
  #5 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
soddim, you know exactly what I intended. To imply otherwise is a cheap shot.

However, to remain on point, being liable to criminal proceedings for using a legitimate weapon does seem to put British military commanders in a bind.

It would appear they (the poor bastards in my original post) have been sold out for an EU reward with few benefits in return.
 
Old 18th May 2008, 20:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well, Lincolnshire
Age: 69
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, we have to go to war with one arm tied behind our back's. Does Terry the Terrorist have the same SOP's? For F***'s sake!!! We'll be air dropping them Bandaids next!!!!
taxydual is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 21:07
  #7 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We'll be air dropping them Bandaids next
What, Bob Geldoff?
 
Old 18th May 2008, 22:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Quote:
We'll be air dropping them Bandaids next

What, Bob Geldoff?
Just as long as it isn't on a Monday.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 22:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somerset
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see why Brit troops would face prosecution if it is US forces that use the weapon. If Brit Forces call in the mud shifters then they get what ordnance they are given, and even then the guy dropping the weapon isn't the one breaking the law, the gov't owns the bomb in the first place.

On a 2nd point. Perhaps we should make bombs out of marshmallows now just in case it hits someone on the head. While we are at it, paint it a nice colour so that it doesn't offend anyone when it is dropped and doesn't go bnag -it is also environmentally friendly and will dissolve over time, or be eaten by children. The marshmallow would be useful in absorbing the loud noise from the bnag action, thereby not waking anyone up that lives near the target.
Mr-AEO is offline  
Old 18th May 2008, 22:19
  #10 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and even then the guy dropping the weapon isn't the one breaking the law, the gov't owns the bomb in the first place.
oh yes, orders are orders after all ! Now, where have I heard that before ?

S_H
Safety_Helmut is offline  
Old 19th May 2008, 06:07
  #11 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't suppose we could give up cluster bombs and go back to good old napalm...?
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 19th May 2008, 06:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why bother with Napalm? Fuel-Air weapons are far more effective and readily usable.
Or how about WP?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 19th May 2008, 07:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Transiting the M27
Age: 50
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just wonder how many international treaties the UK has signed, but the US has not. If we work in coalition there should be incredibly robust rules of engagement so that our troops get both the protection and a fair representation.

As for the comment that terrorists, sorry, extortionists and murderers, have no rules, if we had no rules to take them on, the world would be chaos. I'd rather not be lowered to their levels, thanks.
Beatriz Fontana is offline  
Old 19th May 2008, 08:16
  #14 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why bother with Napalm?
Cos its photogenic.

Works pretty good on poppies too.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 21st May 2008, 23:24
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Napalm

" Works pretty well on poppies too "

In that case can I request a strike on the weeds in our garden - might be a whole new market/role, as the sodding stuff advertised on telly' doesn't work.

If I'm advised of the ETA I'll keep the pets & maybe even girlfriend in, but at the moment I feel I'll let the nearby cowboy builders have the experience !
Double Zero is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 01:12
  #16 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Gordon Brown on collision course with George W Bush over Iraq cluster bombs
By Tim Shipman in Washington
...This was a Party Political Broadcast on behalf of the Armaments and Munitions Industry. Please give generously, every penny you give could contribute towards taking a life somewhere.
Two's in is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 06:29
  #17 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,381
Received 1,581 Likes on 719 Posts
Why bother with Napalm? Fuel-Air weapons are far more effective and readily usable.
....I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory.
ORAC is online now  
Old 22nd May 2008, 20:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Some-r-set
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the use of white phosporus illegal already?


I think I remember reading about US troops using rounds with WP heads (Smoke grenades I believe?) as weapons and inquiries and that sort of ****.
High_lander is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 21:16
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from an article here...

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/ne...rus-debate.htm

Also on Tuesday ---- after seeming to have the last word on the cover-up controversy last week when he said U.S. forces had used the chemical as a perfectly legal "incendiary weapon" against insurgents ---- Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Barry Venable backtracked on that statement and denied the weapon was used to burn insurgents or civilians.
He said it was only used to drive enemy fighters out of their hiding places so they could be killed by other means.
"We do not use it as an incendiary weapon," said Venable, contradicting his earlier statements.
"But it has incendiary effects," he added.
In his rolling Texas drawl, Venable compared the use of white phosphorus in Fallujah to lawmen trapping "bad guys" in a Western film.
If the fugitives are holed up in a building and "you can't shoot 'em any other way," he said, "you set fire to the building and shoot 'em when they run out.
"That's how they (white phosphorus bombs) were used in Fallujah," Venable said.
Venable, even as he further parsed his previous statements on white phosphorus, blamed the controversy on inaccurate reporting, and mistakes made by government officials.
Yes, there was a stink about it at the time.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 22nd May 2008, 21:29
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Interesting,

In Ultimate Force on Saturday our hero used WP exactly for the purpose of incinerating a corpse to stop it being mutilated.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.