Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

William borrows a company Vehicle.....

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

William borrows a company Vehicle.....

Old 20th Apr 2008, 11:02
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,500
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
I hope Torphy lays into his subordinate commanders over this - too much to hope for a royal interview without coffee or a 1069 but one can dream.
And whoever made the decision to waste valuable Chinook flying hours on F/O Wales.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 11:08
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Anglia.
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How distant was the Prince from his most recent pyss up?
Avitor is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 11:10
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,448
Received 71 Likes on 33 Posts
It strikes me that, like most things in life, this is a matter of personal opinion.

If you are pro-royal then the....perfectly normal training flight, good PR, its the 'Royal' Air Force for goodness sake, we've all done it, get a life, etc..... arguements come out.

If you are anti-royal then it's the.....waste of time, taxpayers money misused, rich spoilt brats, etc ....... arguements.

Personally I am very pro-royal when starting from the Queen and working down, but become less and less impressed when we approach the younger generation of 'Royals'. I think Zara gets it right, but I'm afraid I can't say the same for the young Princes. Any sympathy they may have had due to the tragic loss of their mother has long since evapourated in my mind. I feel they have the give:take ratio wrong at the moment. They have many opportunitys to misuse their position, the mark of their character is whether of not they take or decline those opportunities.......

Standing by for any incoming ........
Biggus is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 11:39
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 572
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
There had been a numbers of failures here in particular from Prince William, and the RAF who authorised this, in not realising how this would look to the public when it got out.. Why wasn't there someone prepared to say no to him?

When the forces rightly complain about lack of helicopters, which may be putting lives at risk, aren't people going to ask if that is so how can Prince William use one apparently as a private taxi?

I accept it was more than that and I'm sure there was training involved but it looks bad.

If only the Princes had a fraction of the common sense of the Queen.
Brewster Buffalo is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 13:18
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Would this training sortie (presumably with a full crew of 4 on board) have still been flown at some point if Wills had not been there....yes.

Was it any extra effort to use a new field in the vicinity of Odiham...no.

Do some posters need a 'meerkat moment'....definitely! (Where you pull your heads out your ar$e and have a good look around you to see what's really going on).

PS: And how exactly is Jon Lake an 'RAF-trained' pilot. I mean, Air Cadets who got a few hours on Chipmunks in the 80's can claim to be 'RAF-trained'! (Like Jacko) Can anyone dish the dirt on Jonny-boy?
Training Risky is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 13:40
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
A lot of fuss about nothing.

If it gave HRH a good insight into aspects of tactical SH flying with the benefit of hands-on experience, a good thing too!

I would suggest that this is of arguably greater benefit to the RAF as a whole then qualifying an Air Vice Marshal to fly the Typhoon. What possible need could there be for that?
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 13:44
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,500
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
PS: And how exactly is Jon Lake an 'RAF-trained' pilot. I mean, Air Cadets who got a few hours on Chipmunks in the 80's can claim to be 'RAF-trained'! (Like Jacko) Can anyone dish the dirt on Jonny-boy?
Does it really matter? It only takes twelve weeks to earn a set of RAF wings, even with time off to go skiing in Klosters.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 14:13
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beat me to it BEAgs,

A few flying hours spent giving the future head-of-state an insight into the capabilities of his air force and at a the same time countering some of the institutional anti-RAF rhetoric he will have been exposed to in the Army is money well spent.

It is certainly better value than allowing some here-today, gone-tomorrow CAS to display his prowess by soloing in the latest wonder-fighter (and I don't really begrudge that either!)

Did the RAF not have any media-savvy people keeping any oversight of this whole project to prevent such own-goals?
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 14:36
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 80
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Institutional anti-RAF rhetoric in the Army, BP?

You wait until he gets to the RN!
exscribbler is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 14:51
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but he's now realised that the Navy's whole future is pinned on providing expensive mobile airfields for RAF aircraft

Anyway he's only going there to widen his circle (of friends).
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 15:11
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F/O Wales was always going to have a different experience of life in the light blue than F/O Bloggs. HRH simply has to take the rough with the smooth...

Smooth - Wings after 13 weeks, skiing holiday included. At the stick of a Chinook on week 14.

Rough - Media / Public attention when he tries to earn himself a bl*w j*b token by landing in his girlfriends back-garden.

Bolk.

I've re-worded that last sentence 3 times but 'back-garden' always looks like a euphimism.
Bolk is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 15:17
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BATH
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
William Borrows etc

BEagle. I'm surprised at you. The fact is that this was p*** awful Pr for the Royal Air Force, and if the press reports today are accurate (for a change) then CAS should be sacking someone pronto. Who the h*** authorised these flights, with the obvious risk of comparison with Afghanistan shortage of Helo capacity? Jp
John Purdey is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 15:27
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
with the obvious risk of comparison with Afghanistan shortage of Helo capacity
?

Comparisons are odious, none more so than in this silly story.
goudie is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 15:54
  #74 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah, Chinook base is Odious.

Whatever, what's done is done, it'll blow over. When does he go to sea? His first run ashore should produce some spectacular drivel.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 15:57
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Isn't it amazing how many folks BELIEVE every word that is printed as "Gospel" .... a whole thread devoted to discussing a press report without a single proven fact...

so lets send out a single sentence and build a complete fabrication around it .. and if we use the "royal connection" then all the mugs will believe it.

What a waste of time .. must be a "slow day" in the press world.
OmegaV6 is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 16:22
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BATH
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
William etc.

Goudie. Silly, but damaging nevertheless.
John Purdey is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 16:45
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up North
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it gave HRH a good insight into aspects of tactical SH flying with the benefit of hands-on experience, a good thing too!
Err...what sort of hands-on experience are you talking about? Hands-on strippers?
JessTheDog is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 16:45
  #78 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should MoD PR et al have any common sense then will give this story the attention it deserves and ignore it. Apart from a few rabid anti-royalists this story will have have slipped off the national psyche but about, ooh, six this evening... I can't believe that so many supposedly educated people on these forums can be so seduced by the utter toilet that is printed by the tabloids.

Oh and can you droids stop twatting on about Afghanistan etc etc? How many times do you need it drilled into your thick skulls - aircraft have to stay in the UK so people can train on them. I suppose Odious could've used that 2 hr slot to strip, pack, ship to Afg, reassemble, operate, strip and then reship home again in time for the next wave.

If you do feel the need to saddle up your amply-legged equine transport then how's about you actually get onto the Govt on the real issue that's crippling us - lack of spares and engineers to fit them. Somebody tooling about in one of our trg aircraft for 2 hrs affects the price of fish not one iota.

When we start melting down railings and saucepans to make Spitfires then perhaps I too might display some mild angst but until that time can you people stop being such bloody drama queens.



Right, back to the plastering.........
StopStart is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 17:03
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Emptying the litter bin
Age: 65
Posts: 409
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Spot the odd one out

Chap from motoring programme gets a jolly in a Typhoon.

Another chap from same motoring programme races a Typhoon in a sports car.

Weather woman gets a trip with Red Arrows.

Chap from another BBC programme gets a trip in a Typhoon.

Chap who's Granny owns the train set gets to go on a training trip in a Chinook


Didnt hear the press moaning about the others did we ???
PICKS135 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2008, 17:09
  #80 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nick, it most certainly was. And the Germans were bombing London. Personally I don't believe we've got ourselves a War of National Survival quite yet...



PICKS135 - the Royals are an easy target for those with an agenda, as your examples show.
StopStart is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.