Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

VC 10's in formation??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

VC 10's in formation??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2008, 18:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of england
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VC 10's in formation??

Not sure if they were but my aircraft recognition isnt too bad, but im sure i saw 2 VC10's in close formation over the A34/Oxford area today. Looked impressive to see those type of aircraft doing some nice close flying turns.
Anyone confirm?
petop is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 19:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 273 Likes on 111 Posts
The VC10 force have been doing such things for almost 25 years now.....


Something which mere people-tube drivers never get to do!

Even the most junior of co-pilots is taught to fly the FunBus in close formation on the VC10 course.
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 19:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mornington Crescent
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure it was VC10s in this case, but occasionally the Dominie can look (vaugely) like a VC10 from the ground - they do formation too!
BluntM8 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 20:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: neither here nor there
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beagle

What a crap picture

Forward up and in...............he's not even stabilized



Lionel Lion is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 20:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: neither here nor there
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And post-script pub, he's formating(sp) on a fecking C1 er K
Lionel Lion is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 21:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two VC10s servicible at the same time - wow!! Brize Norton Memorial Flight having a good 2008 then!!
Stretchwell is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 22:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bucks, UK
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two VC10s servicible at the same time - wow!! Brize Norton Memorial Flight having a good 2008 then!!
That's a great caption... there should be a picture to go with it!
EyesFront is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 01:06
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South of england
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im sure they were VC10's. Everyone slowed down to watch them and nearly caused the 3rd accident i saw on the A34 today!!
petop is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 08:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IIRC, an 'Accompanied Letdown' is still an annual requirement for VC10 training purposes. The manouevre is designed to allow a tanker to lead a receiver to the runway when the receiver has suffered degradation of it's flight instruments for any reason. It's challenging to find a fast jet willing to accommodate the training requirement as it takes more time than they generally have available for things other than their own requirements. Consequently it is common practice for two tankers (especially 2 VC10s) to fly the fromation, which terminates at specified minimums above the runway. The procedure was incorporated into ATP56(B) from, I believe, UK AARNIs, and is now accepted practice worldwide. I think the RAF is the only Air Force to have the annual training requirement though.

It is fun and it does look good too, but when used for real, when it's snowing, with half a mile visibility and a 400ft cloud base, the wingman is a single-seat fast jet with only his secondary flight instruments availabe and it's dark - all the practice is worthwhile.
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 08:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 273 Likes on 111 Posts
Is it really a BTR now? It used to be something we taught on the course, but I don't recall it being an annual BTR...

Quite fun doing accompanied letdowns at places like Humberside and St Mawgan, where people weren't used to seeing 2 aircraft of that size in close formation.
BEagle is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 09:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Speaking as the ex-101 Stats man (hence a dubious authority on such matters) it was a 12 month BTR.

And here's proof that 3 VC10s were once serviceable!



The spotters will point out that as one is white, it must have been a while back when there were more and they were younger.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 09:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proof ?

There is no proof of 3 Serviceable. The photo could have been taken from anything!

As for it being taken some time ago.... clearly. And they should have been due for replacement then! Old, Embarrasing and Falling apart. When will we stop looking like we are the 'Council' Air Force on Benefits ?
formertonkaplum is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 09:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UTOPIA
Posts: 111
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old - yes

Embarrasing - occasionally

Falling Apart - No!

The funBus is still in good shape and lovingly tended to, however spares are increasingly hard to come by especially after some bean counter decided the most cost effective storage facility was in Germany.
12 twists per inch is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 10:34
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WILTS
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
certainly were both airborne, recovery in to Brize breaking in to the circuit, no1 had to break off his approach as he was cutting up the Tri* turning finals, luckily we were very nice and made the turn off rather than full length which meant no2 could land behind us without having to do another circuit
14greens is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 10:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Still flying after 40 odd years, must be well cared for and still looking elegant in her dotage.
goudie is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 13:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Quote formatonkaplum: "There is no proof of 3 Serviceable. The photo could have been taken from anything!"

I don't think it could have been taken from a Chipmunk!

It was another VC10, honest!
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 13:43
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Petop - they get closer when they inflight refuel each other!...Parts of them even touch each other.....
L J R is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 13:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Petop
It was indeed two VC-10s.
They have been (for the past few days) training off the coast of North Devon/Cornwall.
Quite common, infact...
Razor61 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 16:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RAF Kinloss
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so it's not quite the same, but they're taken FROM a VC-10 on a tanking trip I tagged along with. Nothing quite the same as watching two large aircraft flying that close...





RAF_Techie101 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 16:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: An airfield cunningly close the Thames
Age: 46
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts




Try this!

Yes, that is a tree in the top one.

Last edited by 6foottanker; 9th Feb 2008 at 16:54. Reason: Found another photo
6foottanker is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.