Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Brown Force One update?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Brown Force One update?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2007, 04:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brown Force One update?

What has become of Brown-Blair Force One?

About a year ago plans for a new VIP fleet was big news then ... seemingly nothing. Is is still in the works? (There was talk of 2 jets, 1 for short haul and another for transcontinental)

Closest news of late was the Royals and S-76s.

(edit) - question remains
found an old thread: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=275897

Last edited by 0497; 13th Dec 2007 at 05:08.
0497 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2007, 11:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
It would make me laugh if manpower shortages grounded them!
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2007, 12:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
It is supposed to be contractorised, so there'll be no shortage of crews, what with all the commercial pilots from eastern europe available.
chevvron is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2007, 20:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere sandy probably.....
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah you mean the gershon report - big pile of wrong assumptions made by a bloke who knew nothing about aircraft leasing/management.

Its dead - may be something else along in a few years time.
Spiro is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2007, 20:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brown can bl00dy well walk!
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2007, 20:55
  #6 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Buy another C-17 with a VIP pod. At least it can be of some use when it's not VIP'ing.
 
Old 13th Dec 2007, 23:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps that VIP pod could be air-dispatched. Without a parachute!
TOPBUNKER is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2007, 00:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmmmm your idea has merit TB, however, general elections consume a vast amount of money that could be put to better use else where, may i suggest the leader of the Labour party be inserted via LAPES?
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 16:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Blair Force One" Scrapped

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7315126.stm

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has scrapped plans to buy two private jets to fly him and the Royal Family around the world, the government has said.
Instead, only a small plane for use around the UK will be purchased.

Funny that this should come out when the MPs are under scrutiny about their expenses!
Early Stacker is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 17:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blair Force One grounded before it takes off

From the newswires
The Government has shelved plans to buy two private jets to carry the Prime Minister and the Royal Family around the world.

The proposals were made by former premier Tony Blair and expected to cost the taxpayer as much as £100 million.

A decision to abandon plans for the jets - nicknamed "Blair Force One" - was disclosed in a written statement to MPs by the Department for Transport.

The Government is expected to buy a small plane for trips around the UK.

Transport Minister Jim Fitzpatrick said the department had worked closely with the Royal Household, No 10 and the Foreign Office to reach the decision.

He said: "I am today recommending that the needs of the users of this service can best be met through procuring a small aircraft for official travel within the UK, chartered air services for longer journeys involving small parties, and a continuation of existing arrangements with UK airlines for journeys involving large parties.

"This approach ensures better value for money for the taxpayer whilst also minimising the environmental impact of royal and ministerial air travel, producing an estimated 10 per cent saving on O2 emissions."
Ray Dahvectac is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 17:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
Im sure us ppruners can have a whip round. We need enough to launch the cabinet on a junket aboard Brown Force 1. Dig deep, we need enough fuel to get them to the surface of the sun!
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 17:35
  #12 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There was no way that Brown would have got away with this, and he's smart enough to have worked it out. Chartering makes more sense anyway.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 17:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Taipei
Age: 53
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bloody stupid if you ask me.

Even 3rd world tin pot nations have a 737 dedicated for the transport of the President/Prime Minister etc etc.

While turning up on a BA 777 is fine I do think there is a case for a dedicated transport including enough telephones, faxes yadda yadda.

Since the RAF (should) be getting the A330's soon it seems to me to make alot of sense to order 2 more non tankers or even better a couple of A340s and really do a proper job on them like the US has in their air force ones.

Done properly these can be used for 25 years and I'd also go so far as suggesting getting a couple of 320/319s for the mini trips or lesser lights going on long trips. These people are supposed to be representing Britain at least let them travel with some privacy so they can do a reasonable job when they get there.
VictorWatcher is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 18:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ball gazing
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently ministers and the Royal Family use 32 (The Royal) Squadron, but this will be unavailable from April 1 next year.
Does this mean 32 (TR) Sqn are disbanding?
mystic_meg is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 21:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brown Force One a No-Go

Prime Minister scraps plans for 'Brown Force One'
Sam Coates, Chief Political Correspondent

26-03-2008

Gordon Brown is risking the wrath of the Queen by scrapping plans for a new
"Brown Force One" to take ministers and members of the Royal Family on
overseas trips.
Jim Fitzpatrick, a junior transport minister, slipped out the surprise
announcement earlier this afternoon. He said the Government had abandoned
the £100 million plans to lease two new aircraft because of the rising
running costs and Mr Brown's new guidelines insisting ministers take
scheduled flights where possible.
Instead the Government and Royal Family will be allowed to buy a smaller
jet, with between 10 and 15 seats, to be used only inside the United
Kingdom. This could anger the Queen, who is long understood to have been
pressing for a new aircraft, but Mr Fitzpatrick insisted his department had
worked closely with the Royal Household, No 10 and the Foreign Office to
reach the decision.
He said: “I am today recommending that the needs of the users of this
service can best be met through procuring a small aircraft for official
travel within the UK, chartered air services for longer journeys involving
small parties, and a continuation of existing arrangements with UK airlines
for journeys involving large parties.

“This approach ensures better value for money for the taxpayer whilst also
minimising the environmental impact of royal and ministerial air travel,
producing an estimated 10 per cent saving on O2 emissions.”
The statement to MPs said there had been “substantial increases in the cost
of buying and operating commercial aircraft” since the idea was first raised
in 2006. It also pointed out that the new Ministerial Code - introduced by
Mr Brown when he entered No 10 last summer - sets out that scheduled flights
should be used wherever possible.
“An increasing proportion of overseas journeys, including a number of those
undertaken by the Prince of Wales and the Prime Minister, are now routinely
made on scheduled flights,” said Mr Fitzpatrick
For overseas trips, both ministers and members of the Royal Family will use
either scheduled flights or charter commercial aircraft. The jet will be
paid for by the Department for Transport and ministers will be allowed
access for British flights. Currently ministers and the Royal Family use 32
(The Royal) Squadron, but this will be unavailable from April 1 next year.
The Gershon Review in 2004 recommended that the Government buy two dedicated
aircraft: an Airbus seating 70 to 80 and a smaller executive jet for 15 to
20 passengers, to be used for European travel.
The idea of a "Blair Force One", along the lines of the US President's Air
Force One, had been considered at different times throughout Tony Blair's
premiership. Mr Blair agreed to the plans, which would have cost around £100
million, last May as one of his last acts as Prime Minister.
He approved the decision after, in 2006, he was put in the awkward position
of having to fly to a European summit in Brussels on a carrier displaying
Austrian livery. Before Christmas, Mr Brown travelled to the Middle East in
a private Swiss jet.

-end-

I see Sarkozy arrived on his dedicated A319 along with another A319 in tow for support for his state visit.
Are we the only major government without dedicated long haul transport for the Queen and Cabinet having to rely upon British Airways (And the Swiss)?
Razor61 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 21:36
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bury St Edmunds.
Age: 60
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brown in a PA 28.......
Guzlin Adnams is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 21:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ball gazing
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..already covered in this thread:

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=304350
mystic_meg is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 21:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just seen thanks
I did look on the first page to see if it was 'active' but it wasn't and i only spotted it upon coming back to have a look at this thread.

Thanks for highlighting.

Mods can you delete this thread please.
Razor61 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 21:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More info on it here:-

Prime Minister scraps plans for 'Brown Force One'
Sam Coates, Chief Political Correspondent

26-03-2008

Gordon Brown is risking the wrath of the Queen by scrapping plans for a new
"Brown Force One" to take ministers and members of the Royal Family on
overseas trips.
Jim Fitzpatrick, a junior transport minister, slipped out the surprise
announcement earlier this afternoon. He said the Government had abandoned
the £100 million plans to lease two new aircraft because of the rising
running costs and Mr Brown's new guidelines insisting ministers take
scheduled flights where possible.
Instead the Government and Royal Family will be allowed to buy a smaller
jet, with between 10 and 15 seats, to be used only inside the United
Kingdom. This could anger the Queen, who is long understood to have been
pressing for a new aircraft, but Mr Fitzpatrick insisted his department had
worked closely with the Royal Household, No 10 and the Foreign Office to
reach the decision.
He said: “I am today recommending that the needs of the users of this
service can best be met through procuring a small aircraft for official
travel within the UK, chartered air services for longer journeys involving
small parties, and a continuation of existing arrangements with UK airlines
for journeys involving large parties.

“This approach ensures better value for money for the taxpayer whilst also
minimising the environmental impact of royal and ministerial air travel,
producing an estimated 10 per cent saving on O2 emissions.”
The statement to MPs said there had been “substantial increases in the cost
of buying and operating commercial aircraft” since the idea was first raised
in 2006. It also pointed out that the new Ministerial Code - introduced by
Mr Brown when he entered No 10 last summer - sets out that scheduled flights
should be used wherever possible.
“An increasing proportion of overseas journeys, including a number of those
undertaken by the Prince of Wales and the Prime Minister, are now routinely
made on scheduled flights,” said Mr Fitzpatrick
For overseas trips, both ministers and members of the Royal Family will use
either scheduled flights or charter commercial aircraft. The jet will be
paid for by the Department for Transport and ministers will be allowed
access for British flights. Currently ministers and the Royal Family use 32
(The Royal) Squadron, but this will be unavailable from April 1 next year.
The Gershon Review in 2004 recommended that the Government buy two dedicated
aircraft: an Airbus seating 70 to 80 and a smaller executive jet for 15 to
20 passengers, to be used for European travel.
The idea of a "Blair Force One", along the lines of the US President's Air
Force One, had been considered at different times throughout Tony Blair's
premiership. Mr Blair agreed to the plans, which would have cost around £100
million, last May as one of his last acts as Prime Minister.
He approved the decision after, in 2006, he was put in the awkward position
of having to fly to a European summit in Brussels on a carrier displaying
Austrian livery. Before Christmas, Mr Brown travelled to the Middle East in
a private Swiss jet.

-end-
Razor61 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2008, 11:38
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps a share in a certain fractional ownership company.
They would be able to fly with lots of ex mil pilots
bayete is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.