Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

FRI's for SAR rearcrew?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

FRI's for SAR rearcrew?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2007, 23:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: grimsby
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel FRI's for SAR rearcrew?

Rumour has it from last weeks SAR force conference that the rearcrew are to be offered 75K for a 5 year return to keep RAF SAR alive until the SAR H takes over.

Having seen them last week in the Sheffield floods I think that we should do everything we can to keep military SAR.

Keep up the good work
bighead is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 08:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: up north
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
75K....... that will be for the officers only I guess. NCA you can have £7.50...........and don't spend it all at once.
Keep up the good work, one day we all will be rewarded......
mad eng is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 12:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5 more years ?

Does that mean that the venerable HAR.3 will have to soldier on for another 5 years?

I thought that one of the (supposed) benefits of this new fangled private finance stuff was to speed up the acquisition.

What sort of fatigue life remains ? Is it realistic to expect them to last that long?

I take my hat off to all military crews who continue to work miracles with old kit
microlight AV8R is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 13:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sar Retention

The beautiful Seaking will soldier on for at least another 5 years; consider the procurement process in place else where. 75k to keep a half decent SAR pilot is quite rightly, good money. However, a far greater incentive will be required, one thinks, to retain the rearcrew! For many rearcrew (SAR) there are far better prospects outside now, than within, and those with the nonce/in the position to do so will move into other fields....
Winch-control is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 18:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
It's a great rumour and it is clear to anyone that looks (or wants to look) that rearcrew manning is in tatters and only going to get worse. I think they will have to do a lot better than £75K (which will be less than £50K after tax) if they want to keep being able to man the aircraft.

It's about time the value of the rearcrew was recognised by the MoD - sadly most of the RAF haven't got a clue about what we ask the guys to do on a regular basis.

As for the Sea King - 2017 is the OSD.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 18:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps in light of what the rear crew guys are up to in both Op theaters this FRI should be considered for awarding across the whole of the rotary world, just the thoughts of a humble ex rotary now fixed wing planky basta@d rear crew type
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 19:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: up north
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like your thinking, they could even give it to all of us NCA, for "commonality". They might then end up having enough of us left in to do the jobs they want doing..........

Holding my breath!!!

Note to self: must remember to keep taking the pills
mad eng is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 19:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: middleofnowhere
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will they ever learn...?

Unfortunately for the rear-crew on all our other aircraft types, who are working harder than ever, spending less time at home with their loved ones, and doing the country bloomin’ proud, there isn’t a civie company actively seeking to recruit them.

Not so with our SAR crews.

75K ( 45K after tax according to my maths ) will (once again) be great for the ones who were planning to stay in anyway, but not enough to make anyone change their mind about trying life outside. And as more people opt to leave, the manning decreases, the workload increases and before long, shift manning becomes impossible.

I’m not sure what the opposite of critical mass is, but I reckon we’re close.

DOOMED……WE’RE ALL DOOMED………….!

shawtarce is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 08:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: inside the train looking onto the platform.
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rubbish

If any one is delusional enough to think that rearcrew will get an RFI then they must have been on the drugs carried in the blue and white bottle.

Why bother when there is tens of millions to be saved in year on the RAF budget , the force is gone in a very short period and any WSOp can do the job with enough training at Valley. Does the winchman have to be such a highly trained paramedic, not really, a paramedic/doctor from civvie street can be carried if a sufficiently trained military medic isnt available (a lot of first responders out there), and I am sure there continue to be a plethora of AE's and other ALM's from the SH force that would be glad of a break from Kinloss. How many are we talking about 10, 15 at most as not all are leaving. A decision just needs to be taken at high level to either throw people at the problem, let CHC/Bond in early or bin UK SAR for other than Mil Ops due to manning.

Either pay it to all rearcrew and it should be the same as the pilots, they are on the same cab picking up the same bodies. Let those that want to leave, go, give others the chance to do a very worthwhile job and save the money for more Operationally focussed equipment and quality of life issues, £75k will buy a lot of welfare kit at Bastion/Basra.
SaddamsLoveChild is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 08:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Saddams, unfortunately your simplistic answer to providing SAR rearcrew is typical of the muddled thinking that got us into manning crisis in the first place.

The SAR rearcrew and especially winchmen, are very highly trained and capable guys who can't be replaced by civvy medics - treating a casualty on a street is one thing, doing it on a sheer cliff or a heaving deck is entirely another. Not only have they got to be brave enough to go out of the door in the first place (ever tried a space walk?) but they have to be skilled enough to manage the casualty in the hostile environment they then find themselves in. Not much point winching a doctor to the deck if he either breaks a leg on arrival due to poor skills or starts throwing up once he gets there.

You just go and ask some of the AEs who have come from the Nimrod fleet and crewmen from SH just how easy they think it is on the SAR front line - it's hard work and often rather dangerous - they may not get shot at but they are still putting their pink bodies in harms way on a daily basis.

It's strange but almost all the critics of Mil SAR are those who have never done it - wonder why?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 08:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: inside the train looking onto the platform.
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crab. Did it for 3 yrs and returned to SH, forgotten the number of space walks but enjoyed everyone. If we have to suffer a manning crisis then the pragmatic suggestion is that we reduce the service. Use the trained mil guy to recover the casualty to the aircraft anfd let the trained medic get on with it. If the casualty cant be treated before he gets to the aircraft then its a problem of risk Vs Cost. I am a yachtie and accept that there are risks when I am out in Fce 9 and it all goes wrong, some arse stuck on a cliff deserves what they get, its natural selection and I for one get really miffed when guys have to put their lives on the line for some chavs stupidity and ignorance. Of course the self protecting SARTU wouldnt entertain letting guys with less skills through the door and would continue to make life difficult for those wanting to cross over - empire protection me thinks.

The defence budget has to ge where its most needed, and it pains me to say it, but an FRI for SAR rearcrew would be nice but a waste of funds that we dont have.

Last edited by SaddamsLoveChild; 4th Jul 2007 at 09:16.
SaddamsLoveChild is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 08:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Crab:

SLC,

any WSOp can do the job with enough training at Valley
Yes, that's always been the case! But that training (SARTU and, soon, the collocated OCU) takes more than a year, when combined with the medical trg - and that was before SARTU ran into the performance issues stemming from the engine failure last year, which seriously impedes the flying rate. So an 18-month (ish) lead time for new rearcrew is pretty hopeless when people are upping and leaving overnight (not an exaggeration - one rearcrew guy decided in late March to leave, and did his last shift in May).

throw people at the problem
...not feasible, see above

How many are we talking about 10, 15 at most
That's about the right figure - but when the entire SAR Force only has planned manning (we're already below it) of 60 rearcrew, that's one hell of a shortfall!

Either pay it to all rearcrew
Why? The manning crisis is in SAR rearcrew, and FRIs are targeted at specific groups. FRIs for all rearcrew would be fantastic, and a well-earned reward, but it won't ever happen unless the manning reaches the same crisis point that SAR manning has.
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 10:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Devon
Age: 57
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too late for me I have Joined an Airline
sikeano is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 10:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: middleofnowhere
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Appendage

SaddamsLoveChild:

I am a yachtie and accept that there are risks when I am out in Fce 9 and it all goes wrong, some arse stuck on a cliff deserves what they get, its natural selection and I for one get really miffed when guys have to put their lives on the line for some chavs stupidity and ignorance.
So let me get this correct, you are in a force 9 gale, your mast snaps, your engines are flooded and your first thought is "I guess this my own fault" I'm sure you wouldn't even think of tuning your radio to channel 16 and crying for help.....

And if you really think that everyone we rescue from cliffs are arses, chavs or stupid, then you sir, are an appendage of the highest order. They’re called accidents, and I for one am proud to be given the responsibility to help out anyone in that situation.

I think your reply is probably the most ridiculous I have ever seen on this forum, and that’s saying something.

Have done it for 3 yrs and forgotten the number of space walks
I really hope you are not still doing it for many many reasons.
shawtarce is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 11:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Away with the Fairies
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would appear that an FRI won't happen.

Allegedly (from the man at PMA, or whatever it is now), an FRI requires a manning level of less than 80% (close, but not there yet) and a PVR rate of more than 15% (close, but not there yet either).

An FRI paid in 12/18 months time may be too late, and would be slamming that stable door long after Dobbin has gone walkies, but until the rates hit the above it won't be entertained.
No Vote Joe is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 11:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: inside the train looking onto the platform.
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not saying dont pick up the people from accidents, yes I would dial up CH 16 and ask for help, but I would accept whatever service was provided however good or bad, - Caribbean SAR is a small chap in a small boat with a Lloyds open form by the way. What I am saying is that the SAR Force do the best that they can with the people they get. And the general public should not continue to expect the level of service that they get now. It is also about natural selection for some accident victims but under H&S we cant use that excuse any more. And also the fact that YOU the SARF have always performed above and beyond but because of the present situation will no longwer be able to. Its a fact we are short of money and giving it to a minority to stem the tide of PVR is a waste.

I wish you safe flying and hope that you can see the futility of the financial gesture. What will help is the fact that Fg Pay will become pensionable in the non to distant future as a retention incentive across the board for all aircrew.
SaddamsLoveChild is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 11:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Away with the Fairies
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SaddamsLoveChild
the general public should not continue to expect the level of service that they get now.
Political dynamite, dear chap.

Joe Public would be up in arms if the service he has now is severely depleted and reduced to man and pay for 2 Ops that he doesn't really care about, and doesn't really agree with!

Can see it now, PQ's about the climber that dies on the Ben (Lossie not available, no crews), or the kiddy that has severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen after an allergic reaction following a bee sting on a remote beach in Pembroke (Chiv not available, no crews).

Now then Mr Brown, your reaction, please!
No Vote Joe is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 11:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Nice sentiments Sadamslovechild - may I suggest that you really are in the wrong job.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 16:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: .....................................
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can see it now, PQ's about the climber that dies on the Ben (Lossie not available, no crews), or the kiddy that has severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen after an allergic reaction following a bee sting on a remote beach in Pembroke (Chiv not available, no crews).

Now then Mr Brown, your reaction, please!
I don't suppose Mr Brown would really care. As for said child maybe the parents could ask why Helimed 57 the Welsh Air Ambulance is maybe not available.
How many questions do you think get asked when Lossiemouth's 1st and 2nd standby are U/S? Lots I hear you say, but that's only because of the fast jet activity in and around Lossiemouth's patch. If maybe they are off for a while I guess they could fly a cab up from Boulmer to help out.
samuraimatt is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2007, 17:12
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Away with the Fairies
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by samuraimatt
I don't suppose Mr Brown would really care. As for said child maybe the parents could ask why Helimed 57 the Welsh Air Ambulance is maybe not available.
How many questions do you think get asked when Lossiemouth's 1st and 2nd standby are U/S? Lots I hear you say, but that's only because of the fast jet activity in and around Lossiemouth's patch. If maybe they are off for a while I guess they could fly a cab up from Boulmer to help out.

Air Ambulances cannot get to some places that Queenies can, because they do not have a winch.

Most SAR Flts go Off State now and again, but it will be for technical problems with the airframes. They never go off state because they cannot provide the crews. Most SAR Guys are spending a lot of Motorway hours at the mo propping up the shift plots all over the country.

Lets just hope it's not you or SLC that the PQ refers to!
No Vote Joe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.