Soapy Watson's ride on the Alriago
Suspicion breeds confidence
Thread Starter
Soapy Watson's ride on the Alriago
I think he did a great job. Seems like the MoD embarked on its usual backstabbing routine on a pilot that saved his aircraft. How much would a new one cost? Its the same Soapy Watson that flew as wingman to Sharkey Ward on Op Corporate. The guy deserves better. Just my 2p.
Here
Here
For some reason, nanny won't allow b l o g s p o t . c o m and has inserted a load of asterisks....
Try typing:
http ://fogonazos (without any spaces) followed by
. b l o g s p o t . c o m (without any spaces), then
/2006/12/el-da-en-que-un-harrier-de-la-royal.html
Try typing:
http ://fogonazos (without any spaces) followed by
. b l o g s p o t . c o m (without any spaces), then
/2006/12/el-da-en-que-un-harrier-de-la-royal.html
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Nanny does not like the word bl0gsp0t - but this should take you to the page you want:
http://tinyurl.com/27qpcq
http://tinyurl.com/27qpcq
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Navaleye, you say its the same Watson that supported Ward down in the FI, yet the Telegraph suggests he was only a part trained pilot a year after Op Corporate, when this incident took place. Whoever was the pilot, BTW I do agree that he took the best course of action for the ac and himself. Lets be honest the salvage value for what at the time would be a fairly low hours ac is buttons to the MoD. Wonder whether he ever tried to appeal against the reprimand?
Red On, Green On
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Ward
Lt. M. Watson was the wingman:
"1 May - FMA IA 58 Pucará: Commander "Sharkey" Ward and Lt. M. Watson in Sea Harriers of Number 801 Squadron on CAP engage three Turbo-Mentors. One enemy aircraft is damaged by cannon fire from Ward's aircraft."
Lt. M. Watson was the wingman:
"1 May - FMA IA 58 Pucará: Commander "Sharkey" Ward and Lt. M. Watson in Sea Harriers of Number 801 Squadron on CAP engage three Turbo-Mentors. One enemy aircraft is damaged by cannon fire from Ward's aircraft."
Yes, Him
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First comment on the first link by AA is from Jesus, so it looks like the Upper Management is on Soapy's side.
Thought at the time it was an exceptional bit of airmanship. Also wondered what the ship's crew thought as he landed on.
Thought at the time it was an exceptional bit of airmanship. Also wondered what the ship's crew thought as he landed on.
Lt M Watson is still flying. A more subdued aircraft now. Speak to him on a regular basis. I remember seeing him for the first time in 1980s, getting his huge frame out of a Sea Harrier, then taking off his helmet to reveal glasses! Well, that blew my notion that all Sea Harrier pilots were gods! I have never got over the shock.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adminisphere: FL Nosebleed
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Displeasure or BZ?
I was in Illustrious at the time Soapy went missing and we were all extremely worried (obviously) when he didn't come back.
The dit as to what happened (as far as I can remember it - please post corrections if anyone out there knows better, and is Soapy a Ppruner?) went like this:
Soapy launches for NATO Exercise (all radio and radar silence stuff, just for good measure), does his bit and then comes to look for Mother.
No Mother, anywhere. So he stooges around at high altitude trying to look for Mother, or something he might be able to land on (no diversion of course).
By now he is close to vapour in the tanks, but he sees a ship below, throttles back and descends to have a look.
B****r, small freighter, no flight deck and now on vapour, so he decides he'll have to eject, but reckons that as the Pegasus is still running it'd be better to slow down and eject close to the ship so they'll see him and come to pick him up.
He slows down to the hover alongside the freighter, and the engine is still running! Now he can see that there is a nice flat container he could land on, and a foremast with a light on it to line up on. So tranistions across and lands.
Of course, the container top isn't exactly Camrex'd (high friction flight deck coating for those who don't know), the jet start to slip so he selects undercarriage up and shuts down the engine.
By the time he got out of the aircraft the freighter's crew have turned up with fire hoses (there was a bit of smoke apparently) and rope to tie the Harrier down.
Back on board Illustrous we were delighted to find out that he was safe and well, and the rumour was that he'd get some sort of BZ for good airmanship, saving the aircraft etc.
There was also a rumour that somewhere along the line the wrong Lat/Long had been entered in to the aircraft nav system (don't ask how the aircraft got given Lat/Long unless you want to be very depressed).
As a postscript, we heard that the freighter crew just wanted a contribution to their beer fund and the dented motorcaravan (the jet slipped on to it) paid for. It was the union who told them they could claim salvage for the aircraft.
As it turned out the "Admiral's Displeasure" faction won the day - morale boosting was just as good then.
MOh
The dit as to what happened (as far as I can remember it - please post corrections if anyone out there knows better, and is Soapy a Ppruner?) went like this:
Soapy launches for NATO Exercise (all radio and radar silence stuff, just for good measure), does his bit and then comes to look for Mother.
No Mother, anywhere. So he stooges around at high altitude trying to look for Mother, or something he might be able to land on (no diversion of course).
By now he is close to vapour in the tanks, but he sees a ship below, throttles back and descends to have a look.
B****r, small freighter, no flight deck and now on vapour, so he decides he'll have to eject, but reckons that as the Pegasus is still running it'd be better to slow down and eject close to the ship so they'll see him and come to pick him up.
He slows down to the hover alongside the freighter, and the engine is still running! Now he can see that there is a nice flat container he could land on, and a foremast with a light on it to line up on. So tranistions across and lands.
Of course, the container top isn't exactly Camrex'd (high friction flight deck coating for those who don't know), the jet start to slip so he selects undercarriage up and shuts down the engine.
By the time he got out of the aircraft the freighter's crew have turned up with fire hoses (there was a bit of smoke apparently) and rope to tie the Harrier down.
Back on board Illustrous we were delighted to find out that he was safe and well, and the rumour was that he'd get some sort of BZ for good airmanship, saving the aircraft etc.
There was also a rumour that somewhere along the line the wrong Lat/Long had been entered in to the aircraft nav system (don't ask how the aircraft got given Lat/Long unless you want to be very depressed).
As a postscript, we heard that the freighter crew just wanted a contribution to their beer fund and the dented motorcaravan (the jet slipped on to it) paid for. It was the union who told them they could claim salvage for the aircraft.
As it turned out the "Admiral's Displeasure" faction won the day - morale boosting was just as good then.
MOh
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alraigo incident
We had the a/c back to Dunsfold for what turned out to be very minor repairs - if memory serves it was combined with a scheduled maintenance / update turnround.
I always had the impression it was the EMCON silence which really put the lid on his troubles, with people insisting on sticking to the exercise rather than help out, and they were the ones to give a kick up the **** -
Anyway it seems anyone even mentioning aircraft incurs senior naval displeasure automatically - general opinion I knew of was that he should have been highly commended, but still questions unanswered about several systems down at once ( is the head down compass a realistic option in that scenario, can a Seajet pilot comment ? ).
The incorrect lat / long input explains a lot...
I always had the impression it was the EMCON silence which really put the lid on his troubles, with people insisting on sticking to the exercise rather than help out, and they were the ones to give a kick up the **** -
Anyway it seems anyone even mentioning aircraft incurs senior naval displeasure automatically - general opinion I knew of was that he should have been highly commended, but still questions unanswered about several systems down at once ( is the head down compass a realistic option in that scenario, can a Seajet pilot comment ? ).
The incorrect lat / long input explains a lot...
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 63
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I Lead the Sortie
Hi,
Soapy was my No.2. We were briefed to look for a French aircraft carrier off Portugal. EMCON silent, low level transit to disguise our ships position, pop up then individual search on RWR for any sign of the French group. We were due to RV at the same point 30ish minutes later and transit back at low level.
Soapy was first off the deck, I launched and 'gathered him up' (he was heading in the wrong direction) and flew to the point where we split up for the individual search. Thats the last I saw of him for a few days!
His NAVHARS kit had misaligned on deck (an occasional occurrence at sea with rough deck movement and bearing in mind this was his 3rd sortie on the squadron, understandable he missed the cues), so when we launched he was going the wrong way. His aircraft reference position was also increasing in error at a great rate. As a result his 'square search' was much more rectangular than mine and it was with hindsight not surprising that we did not RV in the same position after the search.
I held on for as long as I could waiting for Soapy, then recovered to the ship and as I recall the 'EMCON silent' ship was making the RWR sick on my knee with all the radiation coming from the group looking for the lost jet.
The wing was launched to look/listen for PLB transmissions to no avail. After a very sobering afternoon/evening we eventually got the telex from the Naval Attache in Madrid that he was safe and well.
I only looked at the photo's from that evening in the bar last month. Flying suits and cummerbunds, pissed as newts and very relieved.
Soapy did exceptionally well for his experience. Arch Sinclair ejected from his jet years later in similar circumstances off the west coast of Scotland (compounded by a ships DF mast being stowed horizontal and giving false steers). A great story for the kids!
Didn't Skippy eject from that jet after a birdstrike in Scotland a few months after it came back into service?
Alistair McLaren
Incidentally, as I recall there was no 'backstabbing' and it was not held against him in the following years. Equal measures of backslapping and 'developmental feedback' during the formal interview.
There were 2 'Soapy' Watson's, Mike Watson (Falklands and CO 800) and Ian Watson (the younger). We know him as 'Suds', son of Soapy...........well you get the picture!
Soapy was my No.2. We were briefed to look for a French aircraft carrier off Portugal. EMCON silent, low level transit to disguise our ships position, pop up then individual search on RWR for any sign of the French group. We were due to RV at the same point 30ish minutes later and transit back at low level.
Soapy was first off the deck, I launched and 'gathered him up' (he was heading in the wrong direction) and flew to the point where we split up for the individual search. Thats the last I saw of him for a few days!
His NAVHARS kit had misaligned on deck (an occasional occurrence at sea with rough deck movement and bearing in mind this was his 3rd sortie on the squadron, understandable he missed the cues), so when we launched he was going the wrong way. His aircraft reference position was also increasing in error at a great rate. As a result his 'square search' was much more rectangular than mine and it was with hindsight not surprising that we did not RV in the same position after the search.
I held on for as long as I could waiting for Soapy, then recovered to the ship and as I recall the 'EMCON silent' ship was making the RWR sick on my knee with all the radiation coming from the group looking for the lost jet.
The wing was launched to look/listen for PLB transmissions to no avail. After a very sobering afternoon/evening we eventually got the telex from the Naval Attache in Madrid that he was safe and well.
I only looked at the photo's from that evening in the bar last month. Flying suits and cummerbunds, pissed as newts and very relieved.
Soapy did exceptionally well for his experience. Arch Sinclair ejected from his jet years later in similar circumstances off the west coast of Scotland (compounded by a ships DF mast being stowed horizontal and giving false steers). A great story for the kids!
Didn't Skippy eject from that jet after a birdstrike in Scotland a few months after it came back into service?
Alistair McLaren
Incidentally, as I recall there was no 'backstabbing' and it was not held against him in the following years. Equal measures of backslapping and 'developmental feedback' during the formal interview.
There were 2 'Soapy' Watson's, Mike Watson (Falklands and CO 800) and Ian Watson (the younger). We know him as 'Suds', son of Soapy...........well you get the picture!
Last edited by Ribbit; 2nd Jun 2007 at 16:01. Reason: addition
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: All over the place
Age: 51
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A couple of photos.........
Thought I would scan these in having stumbled across them today. This (if memory serves correctly) is Ian "Soapy" Watson. Friend of a friend arranged for us to catch up with him for a natter and a look around the SHAR at North Weald in, blimey, 1989, 1990, something like that. He was a really nice guy and gave us a good look at the jet.
Nice MIG 21 - good SHAR display too I seem to remember!
Here he is trying to stay awake as I bore him with another wannabe question. Should have asked him about the boots - what is it with Harrier pilots and the flaps over the laces??!! I naver did make it and I had hair then too! Ho hum!
Nice MIG 21 - good SHAR display too I seem to remember!
Here he is trying to stay awake as I bore him with another wannabe question. Should have asked him about the boots - what is it with Harrier pilots and the flaps over the laces??!! I naver did make it and I had hair then too! Ho hum!
".........what is it with Harrier pilots and the flaps over the laces??!!"
Simple really. As is well known (just look at people like Loader), Harrier pilots have very small willies indeed. Tiny, in fact. Which means that when going for a wazz in flying suits, the average 'bona mate' is likely to wee all over his flying boots due to the inadequate size of his willy and its consequent inability to reach the porcelain.
This was found to cause contamination and premature rotting of the boot laces. So when, as is very common amongst Harrier 'mates', the time came to part company with his 'jet', the likelihood of a 'mate' leaving his boots behind was very probable.
So Wg Cdr Boots (Flying) Pol. 1a down in the mad MoD-box came up with a wizard solution. 'Piss flaps' over the laces! No longer would small-willied Harrier 'mates' run the risk of leaving their boots behind every time they ejected - from then on their piss flaps would guarantee to keep their laces widdle-free.
You can always tell if a pilot is an ex-'mate' even when wearing his own interpretation of Clockwork Squaddie '95 or its desert derivative - piss flaps on the boots.
Simple really. As is well known (just look at people like Loader), Harrier pilots have very small willies indeed. Tiny, in fact. Which means that when going for a wazz in flying suits, the average 'bona mate' is likely to wee all over his flying boots due to the inadequate size of his willy and its consequent inability to reach the porcelain.
This was found to cause contamination and premature rotting of the boot laces. So when, as is very common amongst Harrier 'mates', the time came to part company with his 'jet', the likelihood of a 'mate' leaving his boots behind was very probable.
So Wg Cdr Boots (Flying) Pol. 1a down in the mad MoD-box came up with a wizard solution. 'Piss flaps' over the laces! No longer would small-willied Harrier 'mates' run the risk of leaving their boots behind every time they ejected - from then on their piss flaps would guarantee to keep their laces widdle-free.
You can always tell if a pilot is an ex-'mate' even when wearing his own interpretation of Clockwork Squaddie '95 or its desert derivative - piss flaps on the boots.
Last edited by BEagle; 30th Aug 2007 at 19:09.
