Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Intercepting Wandering Bears & Blackjacks Again (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Intercepting Wandering Bears & Blackjacks Again (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2007, 16:20
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RAF Lincolnshire
Age: 24
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Blackjack intercept article in The Telegraph

Interesting article and quite accurate - but can anyone confirm if AEW aircraft were used?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...wrussia214.xml
AonP is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2007, 14:14
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is that a pop song our one of those amazing Russian military anthems put to alternative music?
Please excuse my ignorance.
Thanks for the link
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2007, 09:08
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Probably about 52N off the West coast of Ireland."

is this true or are you taking the piss?

cheers.
cokecan is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2007, 14:49
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Bodø QRA launched again this morning at 05:20 and established CAP north of Andøya AB. Two Russian aircraft inbound, but they broke off and headed to Iceland, and the QRA returned to Bodø without intercepting.
M609 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 14:15
  #245 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is this true or are you taking the piss?
Ask the RAF .... they left them around 55N10W to go back and refuel and then intercepted them about 35 minutes later on the way back. So 52N (about) is my guess as to where they got to before turning back.

Or maybe the RAF were taking the piss and there were no Russians there ... just a couple of unexplained primary contacts which they manufactured for us all.

Alternatively, ask the BA Captain who saw them and the escorts as he was vectored clear.
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 14:25
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cheers squire, didn't mean it in a ****ty way, it just seems an awfully long way south.

most grateful though.
cokecan is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 17:00
  #247 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries, the downside on the internet is that the tone of a post can't be detected easily or might be misinterpreted. No offence taken

I guess the Irish Air Corps didn't bother to launch against them , though Shannon ATC would probably be able to tell you how far they got South in reality .... or the AWACS crew
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 20:30
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: -
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"52N"

Used to be Cuba in the good ol' days
rab-k is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 20:47
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes, in the old days, – Lightnings holding Northern Q and scarcity of tankers (adherence to the ‘fool’ line), long range Bear Ops were routine. In addition to ‘fleet exercises’ where the presence of any aircraft carrier attracted monitoring attention and occasionally ‘dummy’ attack runs, several Bears would go to Gibraltar to monitor a changeover of the US 6th fleet. Also, there was the 4-yearly 12 ship bear run to the US East coast on 20 Jan (an American will tell you why). You could finish a full mess dinner between these out and back interception sorties.
safetypee is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 22:19
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20 Jan
It might cause a bit consternation in certain US bunkers if if they penetrated the US ADIZ on that day...
M609 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2007, 22:45
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, "Naive" here.
I know about December 7th and September 11th, but what is this January 20th?
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2007, 00:44
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK - The SD
Posts: 460
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Any Bears today..............it is a Friday after all.
serf is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2007, 09:17
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 278
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
January 20th

I suspect that's 'Inauguration Day'

[You know, they have this quaint idea of an elected king, so they have a coronation thingy every four years]
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 08:15
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It now appears they DID intercept on the 20th. Nowegian MOD released this image, it appeared in the local newspapers later.

M609 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 11:04
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great image. Thanks for posting!

The following show images taken from Russian/Soviet aircraft of Western types during intercepts

Quite unique!
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=123497

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=123498

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=123511

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=123581

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=125365

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=125366

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/att...hmentid=125399

A good link showing Norwegian intercepts. How many Badgers?!

http://starfighter.no/web/life331.html

From

http://starfighter.no/web/arti-fle.html
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 15:56
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vale of York
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Christopher Isherwood:

The common cormorant (or shag)
Lays eggs inside a paper bag.
You follow the idea, no doubt?
It's to keep the lightning out.

But what these unobservant birds
Have never thought of, is that herds
Of wandering bears might come with buns
And steal the bags to hold the crumbs.

That's all folks!
Arthur Rowe is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 16:30
  #257 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember reading an intercept report (I have no idea how true it was) printed in a trade magazine about some Bear bombers that were intercepted by a flight of F-4 out of Elmendorf AFB in Alaska.

According to article the WSO in the back seat was taking pictures of the Bear. The crew of the Bear radioed their Command Post and asked what to do about the F-4s taking pictures of them.

The reply was, "Wave."

In the article was a picture of the tail gunner on the Bear waving.

As I posted, don't know if the story is true or not, still funny in any case.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2007, 16:33
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Maybe a bit closer to Cloud Nine
Age: 50
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aww, lovely pics, TEEEJ. I've come over all nostalgic
Lamenting Navigator is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 19:03
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: RAF Lincolnshire
Age: 24
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hansard Answer

Below is the text from a House of Lords question regarding RAF/RN assets involed in detecting and intercepting Russian aircraft:

"Lord Trefgarne asked Her Majesty's Government:

What Royal Air Force and Royal Navy assets are available to detect and intercept Russian Bear aircraft which may approach United Kingdom airspace. [HL5273]

The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence & Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Drayson):

The Royal Air Force is responsible for the detection and identification of aircraft and the dissemination of the recognised air picture within United Kingdom airspace and its approaches, using assets such as RAF control and reporting centres at RAF Boulmer and RAF Scampton and remote air defence radars and communications sites. RAF Sentry aircraft, Royal Navy Type 42 air defence assets and Sea King air surveillance and control Mark 7 helicopters all have the ability to contribute to the recognised air picture when operating around United Kingdom airspace and waters.

Royal Air Force Tornado F3 and Typhoon aircraft maintain continuous quick reaction alert readiness and are normally based at RAF Coningsby and RAF Leuchars."
AonP is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2007, 19:41
  #260 (permalink)  

TAC Int Bloke
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Royal Air Force is responsible for the detection and identification of aircraft and the dissemination of the recognised air picture within United Kingdom airspace and its approaches,
AP3430 refers - I take it someone helped him with the answer?
Maple 01 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.