Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

25FT Lowflying Helo

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

25FT Lowflying Helo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Apr 2007, 17:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the horizon
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
25FT Lowflying Helo

There is some bloke who rides a horse on the local news (LookNorth) currently claiming a helo decided it would be a good idea to fly around at 25ft
Now I'm not calling him a liar, but 25ft near Market Rasen on wednesday seems a bit far fetched. What do these people do with their lives except whinge and ride horses?
oli,_the_original is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 17:41
  #2 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It's a fact that most (but not all) people have a very poor ability to judge the height of a moving aircraft.

25 ft AGL would be very low indeed, and I doubt it's likely outside an MoD exercise area. My guess is that the aircraft was at no less than 125 ft AGL.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 18:14
  #3 (permalink)  
wokkameister
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When I was a stude at Shawbury, there was a letter from a resident of Bowmere Heath stating the helicopters were so low she could make out the colour of the pilots eyes.

Yeah right....the gate height is 1000 feet. Must of been a relative of the six million dollar man!!
 
Old 27th Apr 2007, 18:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pedantry Alert...

If you really feel the need to abbreviate it - it's "must've", if not it's MUST HAVE.

And after that message from our sponsors it's back to the thread...
SpotterFC is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 18:50
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the horizon
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's just what are peoples problems? And all this crap about 'The chinook sneaked up on me' they are big, green, airbourne and noisey, i mean where there are hills there is shadowing of the noise, but in Lincolnshire, it's flat. When they fly past me, you can hear them at 10 miles.
oli,_the_original is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 18:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The real problem is not the judgement of height but the concern the helicopter caused so close to where the unfortunate death of a horse rider resulted from a low flying chinook.

I venture to suggest that it might not be a bad idea to have an 'avoid' notice on this area for a while to preclude any more local concern.
soddim is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 20:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I most definately concur.

" Horse riding is prohibited within 20 miles of Market Rasen for the next 28 days"

This is in order that the riding of wild animals and potential for distress to aircrew, should there be an accident, be minimised.

Gets my vote!!!
HEDP is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 20:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And can the equine community please post some kind of No-Horsebox-tam so when I go over to see me mum for Sunday lunch I don't get stuck behind some clapped out twenty year old Mercedes removal van which has been converted to carry Dobbin, last saw an MOT under Tory rule, and never goes above 15mph.

On a marginally more serious note, driving home tonight from a secret Hampshire helicopter base I passed four separate riders on geegees. Not one of them wearing their complimentary MOD hi-vis vest (one wasn't even bothering with a helmet).
And that's within the MATZ.
Simply asking for it IMHO.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 21:11
  #9 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
helicopters were so low she could make out the colour of the pilots eyes.
Could be true - perhaps the pilot had very big eyes (probably got like that at the bottom of a hairy EOL)
Two's in is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2007, 21:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember a similar one in my Valley days where the whinger could not only make out the colour of the pilot's eyes but also that 'he was smiling at me!'
Zoom is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 11:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole issue of horses and low flying aircraft interests me. I work for an air ambulance and am regularly called out to attend horse riders.


I tried coming up with some stats but couldn't find anything apart from a snippet from a BBC website.... What i would say though, is that infrequent low flying military helicopters are the least of horse riders problems

http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pre...3/riding.shtml
Russell Sprout is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 12:30
  #12 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A thought: are all horses/riders insured, by law, when in public? Do all riders, by law, undertake and pass compulsory training and examination? Do all riders wear protective equipment by law? Are all horses checked for suitability to be out in public?

Me and my (t)rusty KLR250 are. Indeed, if you stood Dobbin and my Kawa side by side and produced a loud noise, my bike engine would very probably stop. Dobbin, however, will be 3 counties away approaching escape velocity no matter what the 6 stone wet through 15 year old school girl on the back does.

Just a thought.
 
Old 28th Apr 2007, 15:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: .
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are these whinging gits the same c s who buy a house near a military airfield and then put in noise complaints? f c c ckmasters!
FATTER GATOR is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 16:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember, FATTER GATOR, they also pay the taxes that keep the helicopters available for the use of the RAF and therefore they should be treated with respect. The greatest aspect of the freedom we defend is that everybody is free to state their opinion - you don't have to like it, but you must respect their right to say it.
soddim is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 16:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my box!
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
25 feet is not that low............................... If you come back with crops wedged in your skids then your low flying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BRASSEMUP is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 16:56
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the horizon
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought low flying was when you came back with no undercarriage
oli,_the_original is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 17:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Uk
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I tried coming up with some stats"

I heard one a few years back, not sure if its true or how they came up with it that Horse riding has an accident rate worse than rugby league and freefall parachuting combined!

Horse riding is Dangerous, and you will have to deal with Helicopters,cars,sudden loud noises, plastic bags stuck on barbed wire fences etc etc

If your not prepard to accept the high level of risk involved then don't get on the horse in the first place

Green Flash

I've often wondered why kids are allowed on the roads on a horse but not on a motorbike
knowitall is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 17:10
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the horizon
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The laws about transport in this country are very strange.

You can get a licence to drive 16 Litre, 500hp of tractor at 16, but not a 1.0 litre car. You can get your pilot's licence before you can get your car licence. I've done this and it's very fun, apart from driving just seems such an anticlimax
oli,_the_original is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 17:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Shhhh!!
Age: 56
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not only the laws regarding transport that are strange............

daze_gone_buy is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2007, 20:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"they also pay the taxes that keep the helicopters available for the use of the RAF"
The helicopters are not for "the use of the RAF" as if it is a weekend flying club! The RAF/Army and Navy aircrew risk their LIVES on a daily basis in these helicopters providing the backup to the other servcemen and women who are also risking their lives across the world. The taxpayer pays for a service to defend the interests of this country and with that comes a training burden.
Market Rasen does have a published avoid which is respected for very obvious reasons. Accidents are tragic and any aircrew with an option will try and avoid any situation which may lead to an incident on the ground or in the air. High Vis garments worn by horses and riders make a huge difference and can help to identify a rider from a much greater distance which can give the pilot time to react.
Low flying is essential training and is not done to annoy the long suffering public. When aircrew are deployed the time for practice is over and reliance on demanding training is paramount. In the current climate of operations overseas, without the training we have, there is a far greater chance of more tragic stories hitting our headlines.
Hugh Been'ad is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.