Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Historical Property being allowed to waste away...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Historical Property being allowed to waste away...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2006, 07:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 233
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
As far as I'm aware none of the former RAF stations now inhabited by the Army were asked for by the Army. As I understand it some politician along with a bunch of civil servants decided to down size the Armed Forces. They also decided to 'draw down' (awful phrase/word) from Germany. That same group of politicals looked around for places to send the units returning from bratty land and spied a load of RAF bases which were going to be closed and made the decision to utilise them, rather than just abandon them. After all, there was nowhere else for the returning units to go to.
So don't go round blaming the Army for 'stealing' all your 'homes'. Blame the people who are the ones guaranteed to shaft all of us - the politicians and mandarins.
As I remember it, in the 70s the RAF were the only ones to close stations as cost savings measures in response to political pressures. But along came the Army to take them over because they were in a lot better condition than most of their bases, so were were the savings for the defence budget?

Similar events have occured in each subsequent round of RAF closures, including RAFG. Remind me of the threat in Europe that requires a presence there now?
RubiC Cube is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2006, 08:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly my point. The Army didn't turn around and tell Whitehall to shut an RAF base because they wanted it, the base was already closed or scheduled to close.

The threat in Europe that BFG/BAOR was there for has now largely evaporated, hence 'drawdown'. What point exactly are you trying to make?
grunt@dhfs.org is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2006, 17:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Defence Estate includes a great many historical sites and buildings, and all three services and their major constituent branches are represented. There are examples of unforgivable neglect whichever service's heritage is involved.

I have a glossy publication from the early '80s eulogising the wonderful historical buildings and sites in the then Defence Estate, produced by its then caretaker, the Department of the Environment. The book is full of expansive promises about how such heritage was in good hands and could look forward to a bright future. The truth for many sites has been quite different, sadly.
scroggs is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2006, 18:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defence Estates

Quite correct. Defence Estates looks after all MOD historic buildings and apparently they now have a 9-point plan of action.

Point 8 is as follows:
8. Disposal of surplus historic buildings

Failure to dispose of, or to re-allocate surplus or under-used historic buildings is a recipe for their uneconomic use, neglect and dilapidation. A firm commitment to the urgent disposal of all buildings for which an appropriate use by a department cannot be found is important if the best return for the taxpayer is to be obtained, and costly repairs avoided.
LFFC is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 00:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Around here
Age: 48
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
A quick search of English Heritage's Buildings At Risk register proves quite interesting for the intra-services debate. Using the critera 'RAF' results in 5 properties, 2 for 'Army' and only 1 for 'Navy'. Interestingly, of the five RAF results, 4 are at Biggin Hill.
lancs is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 10:53
  #26 (permalink)  
REF
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Suffolk
Age: 46
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XL319
RAF bases which are listed can be found on the heritage website. Absolute disgrace IMO
Can you provide a link to this website please?
REF is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 12:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See above!!!!!!
XL319 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 12:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Originally Posted by Dundiggin'
So what I want to know is:

Why are the pongoes letting historical ex-RAF land and property waste away and fall into rack and ruin?? For example and there are lots of 'em:

RAF Upavon - 1st Central Flying School in the World! - Have you seen the state of the hangars? These are listed buildings for christ's sake!! What are you doing about RAF heritage??
RAF Abingdon - RAF Para school - now a dump for bloody tanks! Donkey walloping & jogging is now a priority!! WTF!! Motor bikes are banned!!! What about the rally cars?? Tw@ts!
Let's face it you Army wallas are really a bunch of complete self centered Tw@ts or can you tell me that you really care about the RAF/UK history and in fact, co's you ought to..................co's we are really p'ssed off that you are letting our history go to rack and ruin.

Why????

I would love to stay friends but this is stretching the limits somewhat......
What a complete and utter chopper! You have no idea what you are talking about, there is only one organisation you can blame for the sad demise of your history and thats your own. Don't blame the Army! The only 'battle Honour' the RAF celebrate is the BoB on the 15th of Sept as I seem to recall, then answer me this why has your organisation seen it fit to disband front line sqns that actually took part in that conflict?
I for one (Pongo) do care passionatly about our forces history and do get my arse in my hand when such ill informed poeple such as you blame us.
Tell me are you going to blame the Army as well for the sad demise of West Raynham & Coltishall etc!!!

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTT

Last edited by soprano54; 28th Aug 2006 at 17:11. Reason: spelling
soprano54 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 15:10
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Soprano

Spot on . Me thinks Dundiggin' doesn't like you chaps in brown and green judging by his other thread on JHC!

Standby for Bentley Priory to become a "Health Club" for the rich and lardy, Uxbridge to be handed over the US Armed Forces (Navy if rumour is correct!). Instead we keep Valley ...

W (not a pongo!)
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2006, 15:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was shocked by the state of Gutersloh after the AAC/RLC were there for a few years. They put up fences on the dispersal and then moaned about the RAF when there was no room for the trooping flight to park! Several go-arounds because of grunts running across the threshold when an aircraft was on finals. At least the RLC could park their trucks in straight lines - very important job that.
I made a point of moving a fantastic Battle of Britain portrait from some dark, deserted ante-room to the reception on the day I left!!!
Number2 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 20:37
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Finchampstead
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
soprano54............tut tut........

I wonder if you would ask the Regiment reader to re-read the post to you so that you may understand it better!!

I didn't mention 'battle honours' at all!! I'm talking about property ie buildings and estate...National heritage which remains yours, mine and the Nation's heritage.

'National' heritage dear boy, things like the first Central Flying School in the World at RAF Upavon formed by Lord Trenchard, RAF Gutersloh Officers Mess with its' bending beam in the tower etc etc.

So get him/her to re-read it to you there's a love
Dundiggin' is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 21:05
  #32 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmmm I think it was Bomber Harris who once said "that to get on in the army one needed to look like a horse, think like a horse and smell like a horse". I note things, in essense, have not changed.







rapidly exits stage left putting on tin hat
green granite is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 21:26
  #33 (permalink)  
JNo
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK, m o s t l y
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Less bases -> less money. The days of having to spread assets out to prevent the Russians from taking them out in a one-er are over. It's the only way we can afford the brilliant future assets of the RAF, like the Typhoon. Oh, hang on a minute
JNo is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2006, 21:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern UK
Age: 64
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Number 2
With reference to Gutersloh, the AAC tried to tell the RLC NOT to use the hangers for vehicles as they would crack the floor. But they took no notice. They tried to tell them it is an active airfield but still they wander onto the runway. They almost turned the tower into an office for the RLC Brigadier, because he wanted to have a nice view, but they were talked out of it. The AAC is the minor unit at Gutersloh and is fighting an uphill battle with the Truckie Ludites all the time.
FRAG7 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 01:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: behind a desk
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn those pongoes - just look at what they did to Kenley, Tangmere, Biggin Hill, Manston....
JHC Wilton is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 05:52
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by anotherthing
It was on the 1st April 1918.... longest running April fools joke??
Actually the Royal Air Force came into being on the 2nd January 1918 with the appointment of Trenchard as the RAF's first CAS although it could also be argued that the RAF came into being on the 29th November 1917 when the Air Force (Constitution) Bill, providing for creation of an Air Force and Air Ministry received Royal Assent.

Oggin Aviator,

"In any future conflict it must be recognised that the RAF is the senior service. Today, the effectiveness of air power shows this to be true."

Winston Churchill
The Royal Navy ceased to be the senior service the day captial ships became the ones that a/c flew off rather than the boats with all the big guns.
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 08:35
  #37 (permalink)  
Hellbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crikey we do all spend lots of time worrying about trivial stuff don't we?

If a building is part of the Nation's heritage, let the Nation fund its upkeep. Base Commanders cannot afford to look after the essential buildings they have (look at the state of the troops' single accommodation), let alone maintain relics for posterity. The Forces, and hence the MoD budget, must be focussed on the future and improving conditions. The Nation must take responsibility for anything of historical interest. To blame another Service for letting our 'heritage' rot is just complete and utter tosh and a waste of a posting on here.
South Bound is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 09:34
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 798
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by timex
As far as I can see the AAC have done a very good job of looking after MIddle Wallop, most of the buildings you mention were left by your goodselves to move to greener pastures.
You have GOT to be joking !
oldbeefer is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 14:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it isn't just the armed forces leting historically important buildings rot fall down or be bulldozed in the name of progress! most Govt departments do it, Local authorities do it and buissness certainly does it. We as a nation haven't got the mentality to adapt buildings the first thought is always build new preferably on a green field. why do you think programmes like restoration are so popular!
NURSE is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2006, 14:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rural Somerset
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
Oggin Aviator,
The Royal Navy ceased to be the senior service the day captial ships became the ones that a/c flew off rather than the boats with all the big guns.
(Un) Helpful Stacker............you really cheer my day up!

For info: A boat in the Royal Navy is a submarine.

By the Way.................We have never ceased to be the Senior Service despite the design changes(or numbers) of our surface fleet.

Theres a good chap.......now scuttle off back to your stores and don't release any to those who need them...............
Strictly Jungly is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.