Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New Forum?

Old 14th Apr 2006, 10:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: (LFA 7a)
Age: 64
Posts: 738
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
There are those of us who are not in the mil or ever have been in the mil who do and can offer good (IMHO) opinion into this thread. Leave it as it is please.
jimgriff is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 10:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On the outside looking in
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A_A,

You can check the validity - there is a 'checksum' built in. But I can't see the powers that be giving it out to pprune.

sw
Safeware is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 12:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saaaaaarf
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could always start your own bulletin board Twinact and call it something really apporopriate...

How about a great name like Elitist or something??

You will be after the closure of mixed rank bars and a ban on chip butties next
sirsaltyhelmet is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 12:21
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At a particularly splendid session in th'pub last evening, several fellow PPRuNers were bemoaning their perceptions that the forum was, with obvious exceptions, increasingly boring with a noticeable rise in whinging, mindless mud-slinging and purile posting. In general agreement, and fuelled with not an inconsiderable volume of incahol, I staggered home and set about thrashing the PC.

In the bright and painful light of this morning I'm grateful to Wholi for reminding me of previous debate, and to others for taking up my offer and lambasting me with wet lettuce; to them I apologise and humbly withdraw my ill-thought suggestion. To those who supported my notion, I apologise for my apparent U-turn - sobriety can be cruel.

Still, my gut feeling is that the forum HAS deteriorated in 'quality' over many months, but then I guess that is the price of Mil Aircrew rightly remaining OPEN; the richness of debate, informed argument and humour of many colours is too good to miss - and IMV outweighs the knobhead input (just). Must tell myself to make more use of the ignore option, and stop being a prat.

Jacko - thanks for your offer, maybe I should give Smartypants a shake?

ExRAFRadar - was that you earwhigging at the bar yesterday??

What shall I tell them in th'pub tonight??

Last edited by jindabyne; 14th Apr 2006 at 12:33.
jindabyne is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 12:35
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SSH,

Wow, that's quite a chip you've got there. I don't see you abusing those who run the civvy private forums on this site and labelling them elitist. Presumably, in your eyes, mil aircrew are fair game for abuse and of lesser stature. I was responding to a suggestion made by Jindabyne and others.

I don't recall proposing closing the forum to all ranks, leave this forum as is but provide a private forum for each of the services. Why does it have to be a bulletin board, why not within the excellent environment of PPrune?
Twinact is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 12:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Umm, where did I put the Garmin?
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deteriorated? Yeah a little, but I've seen it happen on other forums. Sometimes they go into a slump where nothing interesting (to me) is posted and I find myself asking, Why do I still read this drivle? Then the slump ends I go though another rash of posting and forget it ever entered my head to stop going there.

So before we start rocking the boat, just remember, in 6 months time we could be stratching our heads over why this ever came up.
Rakshasa is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 13:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saaaaaarf
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Twinact,

I dont have a chip on my shoulder, far from it. I have a lot of friends who are aircrew. If I wanted to have a pop at any of them I would abuse them as they walked past the desk. As for them being lesser than me nope, I appreciate what they do and how they do it. I had my chance at being aircrew and didnt take it, such is life.

I cant see the probelm about how the forum is running now as its open, those outside of the military can contribute easily. People can ask questions about the forces etc so whats the problem? Another example is the Buccaneer thread, full of humour so why should Joe Public not get to see how Military guys think and laugh?

I cant see the need for individual forums thats all, the Army have their aviation one on Arrse but they dont lock it out.
sirsaltyhelmet is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 14:06
  #28 (permalink)  

I'matightbastard
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you didn't let me in, then I wouldn't be able to win the caption competition for you all.




JetBlast fluctuates. So if you find MIL boring now, it won't be in a few months.

Personally, I find it very interesting here and I try to behave like a guest in someone else's house, mostly successfully (hopefully).
Onan the Clumsy is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 15:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jind, alas no. Had I been earwhigging I would have found a way to get in on the conversation and then after much sponging of drinks off of former aircrew, regaling them with tales of 'How I talked down a flight of Lightning's in bad wx whilst at the same time diddling the pretty WRAF assistant' (patently untrue) I would have, in the words of a News of the World journalist, made my excuses and left.

Let me digress.

I never forget the words of an eye specialist doc in London.

I had applied for aircrew, failed, but marked down as 'If we are desperate use him'. Consequently I found myself at a tender age of 20 being driven down by OC Ops to see the Station Commander to be told that I had a place in aircrew training. This was in the days when Biggin Hill was more than a rich man's airfield.

My eyesight was borderline and I had to go to the place near the Post Office tower, (Where I had joined up) for an eyesight test.

After many hours of looking down tubes, reading charts, reading numbers from simulated flight instruments and for some strange reason being asked to perform press up's in my underpants (maybe that was just the doc's way of passing time) he gave this quite brilliant assessment.

"Lad, you would be lucky to find the aircraft let alone fly it."

My point ?

I love hearing and reading stories about the Military flying community. I never made it but once it is in the blood it is there for life. I am sad that I did not make it but temper that with that the fact that it was never meant to be.

Does not stop me picturing myself up there in my F4 over the North Sea doing QRA on a Red Bear coming down the gap, or dodging the same F4 in my Jag low level over Scotland.

I want to read the stories about how the Meteor Mark <Whatever> was a pig to fly in a engine failure. And all the other threads that take me back to a time when I was young and foolish enough to want to strap a FJ on and leap skywards.

So keep the forum 'All Ranks' please, if only for the sake of the youngster's who might pop in and see a thread titled " Low Level Omani Jags" or Buccaneer Tales
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 15:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jindabyne,

It is a common fallacy, I feel, that the KOS like myself (and those I served with) have nothing to offer from our experiences that would be of any use to those serving in "Today's RAF".

I posted the following tale some years ago; I feel, however, that it bears repetition: if you disagree then I apologise.

In the late 1960's No 46 Sqn had on its strength on MAQM Don Hayward. Mr Hayward was approaching retirement and did just enough flying to maintain currency; his normal role was to run the Sqn Ops desk which he did with style. He did, however, have to be re-categorised each year.

Now it so happened that the new ALM Examiner from 38 Group EU was a totally abhored gentleman who would try every means at his disposal to denigrate those whom it was his job to examine.

During Don's "ground cat" on Combat Survival the examiner asked what Don would in a certain situation. The reply was short and to the point; Quote "The first thing I would do is throw that ******* book out the window."Unquote. The examiner "grounded Mr H and awarded him an 'E' category. Returning to 38 Gp he sent off the paperwork and looked for another target.

The examiner was somewhat surprised to find the paperwork returned to him a few days later with a polite note suggesting that he had, perhaps, made a mistake. Now a wise person may have had second thoughts (and perhaps made a few enquiries); but our man was made of sterner stuff. He sent off the paperwork again with a note stating that there was no mistake and Mr H had indeed failed at combat survival!!

A few days later the Flt Sgt received a telephone call from someone who was entitled to show lots of stars on a plate on his car. This Gentleman started by saying that had no wish to try to persuade the Flt Sgt to change his mind; rather he merely wished to point out some facts regarding Mr H that the Flt Sgt appeared to be in ignorance of.

The Gentleman then pointed out that Mr H had been his Air Gunner during WW2 and had, in fact, been shot down TWICE over German occupied territory and had got back to the Allied Lines both times. On the second occasion he had fought with the Maquis for several months until they were overrun by the Allies advance.

The Flt Sgt was posted to Singapore where he was only allowed on 52 Sqn if he was actually conducting a examination.
cazatou is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 16:07
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cazatou

No disagreement old chap - and an apposite recollection.
jindabyne is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2006, 18:00
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SSH,

I cant see the need for individual forums thats all
Do you object to the civilian airline private forums here on PPrune? I suspect not because, like me, we're not civvy aircrew and don't interest us.

Therefore, why should you object if military aircrew wish to have a similar private forum where we can discuss relevant topics, just like the civvies? I said I supported continuing this open forum, so where's the problem? Why should mil aircrew be discriminated against?
Twinact is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 09:51
  #33 (permalink)  
adr

PPatRoN
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Twinact
If military aircrew wish to have a similar private forum where we can discuss relevant topics, just like the civvies[...] where's the problem?
Cui bono?

The civ forums allow people working in the same company to discuss in-house matters away from the gaze of people outside their company. Fair enough; the security may be adequate for that purpose (but don't count on it), and any likely harm from Ryanair (say) picking up (say) bmibaby's gossip would be limited.

Different resources are employed by those wishing to eavesdrop on "in-house" discussions among mil aircrew, and the consequences more serious. A closed forum presents two challenges:
  1. False sense of security. The "private" nature of the forum might encourage some people to discuss stuff they'd not discuss in earshot of others at the Rat and Parrot.
  2. Redundancy. If everyone rightly treats the private forum as if it were public, for security reasons, then what's the point? The public mil forum might wither if all the discussions end up on the private one, and that'd be a loss to those contemplating a career in military aviation, as well as to civilians who are well-disposed to military aviation (whom God preserve).

adr
adr is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 09:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adr,

Thanks for the info and insight into the civvy forum. Should PPrune grant us (mil aircrew) a private forum, I'm sure those using it would be mindful of the security of the site. You would hope mil ppl would be aware!

As to the withering effect of a private forum, I'm sure both would co-exist. It would be a common ground for the 3 services, if we were allowed separate service forums, and so anyone could contribute. Is airline recruiting affected by the privacy of their forums?
Twinact is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 10:00
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a world of my own
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are many private forums (non pprune) that work extremely well and don't suffer from the problems that some seem to be worried about here - for example 'CF Pilots Lounge'.
Genghis Couldn't is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 10:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am in the military.
I am commissioned, but not aircrew.
This thread works best when it has input from all sides - some of it well-informed, some not (this is usually put right by those in the know).
The site works best when we share information between us, shining light where there is darkness and providing different perspectives for those who are often employed in quite narrow fields within the military.
As for non-service personnel having access, all grist to the mill I say - and with the current bunch of mostly narcissistic politicians (of all parties), we need all the understanding we can get.
If I may, I would point to one area where I think we would all benefit and that is the way we deal with Trolls. (Troll = someone who comes into an established community such as an online discussion forum, and posts inflammatory, rude or offensive messages designed to annoy and antagonize the existing members or disrupt the flow of discussion (Wikipedia)). These aholes survive by eliciting a response (any response, good, bad, ridicule). They die without attention, and I say we need to make more effort to ignore them completely.
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 10:42
  #37 (permalink)  
VH-GRUMPY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No this is not the palce for private forums.
I have views about lots of things aviation and politics involving aviation and I want to mix with all views - those that agree and those that oppose. I also come from an military family but have some very firm views concerning Australia's involvement in Vietnam and now in Iraq.
Cheers
 
Old 15th Apr 2006, 10:58
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No-one is suggesting closing this forum down!!!!

Its an appeal to have a private forum for mil aircrew similar to civvy aircrews.
Twinact is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2006, 20:22
  #39 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Without diversity there is a real danger of starting to believe your own publicity. Can't beat a bit of critical banter from others in the "team" (whatever shade of purple that might be) to get things in perspective. Of course, those who can't handle their status being questioned by others might be a bit sensitive to some of the responses.
Two's in is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2006, 21:19
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the sole criteria should be whether you eat and breath aeroplanes. As to where individuals fit in - well.

Ex-RAF Air Radio Fitter on Vulcans and Lightnings, ARB qualified Avionics Eng. Flew with PanAm when operating IGS into Berlin - late sixties doing in-flight weather radar fixes. Then stint flying BN2A Islanders into non-existent strips in New Guinea. Non-existent ? You had to do a reccie before even thinking of putting down.

Then ran a maintenance facility at Rand A/P, Jo'burg with regular circuits and bumps at some of the more exotic mining camps around Southern Africa. All of this undertaken well before the norm became - sit in sharp end, switch on and settle back with coffee. <grin>
alisoncc is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.