Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2018, 13:58
  #5221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm pretty sure the last time someone attacked another country's fleet it escalated to nuclear retaliation. Of course they had to invent the bomb first but still.
Bing is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2018, 17:04
  #5222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KenV

Is bombing Shanghai or another strategic target into oblivion using non nukes "proportional" to using nukes to take out a CBG? I don't know. Do you?
Yes, I do.
The answer is no, in the case of Shanghai, a city of 24 Million people. "Another strategic target" depends on what the target is, how it is attacked and the collateral.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 06:53
  #5223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bing - the twin seaters will be along in a second to say something about attacking the Libyan Fleet in 2011.
orca is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 16:01
  #5224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onceapilot
Yes, I do.
The answer is no.
You sound very sure of yourself. I wonder if Trump, Mattis, and Adm Mullen agree with you. I have my doubts. The US military had little compunctions about bombing Hanoi and no CBG was remotely threatened, never mind nuked. And the US military was desirous and even anxious to nuke China during the Korean War when no CBG was threatened, never mind nuked.

And even if Shanghai were not conventionally bombed, would the US hesitate to mine every significant Chinese port and for good measure also bomb a significant number of "pure military targets?"
KenV is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 19:50
  #5225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
To change direction a bit: Where are the F35/Queen Elizabeth trials being mounted from, and will wherever it is survive the hurricane?
Timelord is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2018, 20:31
  #5226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
To change direction a bit: Where are the F35/Queen Elizabeth trials being mounted from, and will wherever it is survive the hurricane?
Well it was supposed to be Pax River for the aircraft and Norfolk VA for the ship. Might be a bit of sweeping up to do after Florence... messy girl!
Obi Wan Russell is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 12:00
  #5227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 199
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by KenV
And the US military was desirous and even anxious to nuke China during the Korean War when no CBG was threatened, never mind nuked.
"
Ken, I think that was more due to the input of General Douglas -I'm-so-important-I-dont't-need-to-listen-to-my-president McArthur.
Mk 1 is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 12:04
  #5228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
To change direction a bit: Where are the F35/Queen Elizabeth trials being mounted from, and will wherever it is survive the hurricane?

#You know that moment when someone says "watch this"....

Hope they enjoy the ride!
glad rag is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 13:03
  #5229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Derby
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the stated uses of the QE's is "disaster relief" - all part of the service .................
friartuck is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 14:38
  #5230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mk 1
Ken, I think that was more due to the input of General Douglas -I'm-so-important-I-dont't-need-to-listen-to-my-president McArthur.
Indeed, and what stopped him from using nukes was his civilian commander in chief. If Truman had OK'd a nuclear release does anyone imagine the target(s) would have been "purely military with no collateral." Nope. Same with nuking a "purely military target" like a Carrier Battle Group. Nuking a CBG would be taken as a declaration of war, just as taking out battleships at Pearl Harbor was taken as a declaration of war. Once war is declared and nukes released, the target list is certain to include much more than "pure military targets". The notion that the US would restrict itself to "proportionality" in a full on war is absurd. Essentially all of US military doctrine calls for an overwhelming response. Remember "shock and awe"? Zero "proportionality" there, and yet zero carriers threatened, much less nuked.

There's an old saying dating back to WW2. If you shoot at a squad of troops, how do you know who they are?
If you get accurate return fire with rifles, they are Brits
If you get return fire with machine guns, they are Germans
If nothing happens for 10 minutes, but then your position is obliterated with an artillery barrage, they're Americans.

For good or ill, the American military mind set is to use overwhelming firepower. That's doubly true after the Vietnam experience. Remember that the US entered WW2 because a bunch of battleships were sunk on a fairly remote island outpost not even part of the US homeland. Take a look at any photos of Dresden and Tokyo after WW2 and then try to sell the notion of "proportionality". That dog won't hunt. Proportionality in a full on war is a pipe dream.
KenV is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 20:20
  #5231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As this is the Military forum of PPRUNE, readers might be expecting informed and professional level opinion on Military matters. Those who wish to explore the background information about LOAC in open source might search out the subject in the Government documentation that is published. This documentation lists the various conventions and protocols that nations have, or have not, signed and ratified under law.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 20:32
  #5232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onceapilot
As this is the Military forum of PPRUNE, readers might be expecting informed and professional level opinion on Military matters. Those who wish to explore the background information about LOAC in open source might search out the subject in the Government documentation that is published. This documentation lists the various conventions and protocols that nations have, or have not, signed and ratified under law.

OAP
Try telling it to the guy on the err....left.

glad rag is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2018, 20:40
  #5233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HE (or his agencies) know alot about it. You can be sure.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2018, 17:51
  #5234 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Since her arrival in Mayport, Queen Elizabeth appears to have gone silent regarding the media and Twitter. Some fools might think she has been idling in port, waiting for the weather to prove. No! She has been doing warm water trials.


Those trials will have involved flying.

In the last few days, she has arrived at Norfolk:
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2018, 17:20
  #5235 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

I saw that on the documentary in 2011 - the fact that SDSR 10 was not a terminal blow for RN carrier aviation speaks volumes about how rugged and innovative the Navy, and the people in it, can be.


SQEP!


Last Harrier landing in 2011? Eh?


Fleet Commander embarked - what about the First Sea Lord?


Flag Foxtrot coming soon.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2018, 12:47
  #5236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
".... the fact that SDSR 10 was not a terminal blow for RN carrier aviation speaks volumes about how rugged and innovative the Navy, and the people in it, can be."

"....The bastard ought to work for Intourist, Ramius told himself, except that Gorkiy is a city closed to foreigners. He had been there twice. It had struck him as a typical Soviet city, full of ramshackle buildings, dirty streets, and ill-clad citizens. As it was in most Russian cities, winter was Gorkiy's best season. The snow hid all the dirt...."
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2018, 08:53
  #5237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Penryn, Cornwall
Age: 79
Posts: 84
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
idle bystander is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2018, 13:20
  #5238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is believed the first F-35B landings aboard HMS Queen Elizabeth have taken place earlier this week. Official statements and photos/videos will be released tomorrow, Friday 28th September. In the meantime we have to make do with this artist's impression of the event:
Obi Wan Russell is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 13:02
  #5239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Pictures of an F-35 taking off from QE appear on t'net. (UK Defence Journal) Apparently landed/took of on Tuesday

Davef68 is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 14:11
  #5240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Why's he/she got the airbrake up?
ACW342 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.