Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Dec 2017, 12:08
  #4721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't something get wrapped round a prop earlier in sea trials....wonder if it was attached to something solid like the sea bed?
glad rag is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 12:33
  #4722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice summary not a boffin.
switch_on_lofty is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 13:22
  #4723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say clear, concise and useful - but NICE??????

It's a disgrace TBH
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 21:54
  #4724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Without fuss or fanfare, HMS Prince of Wales is afloat:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-...ampaign=social
Obi Wan Russell is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 07:40
  #4725 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
To summarise. The RN standing commitments to reassure and defend British interests around the world are currently maintained by an Offshore Protection Vessel, a Royal Fleet Auxilliary..... and an unarmed shore establishment.
ORAC is online now  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 07:42
  #4726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
ORAC,
Pretty sure that you can add at least one large, silent and pretty deadly submarine to that list...
pr00ne is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 07:47
  #4727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope so as there is a persistent rumour that we were without any active SSN's for a while in Q1 2017
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 08:16
  #4728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by glad rag
Didn't something get wrapped round a prop earlier in sea trials....wonder if it was attached to something solid like the sea bed?
And there was a story of one prop shaft support being slightly out of alignment.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-...peller-issues/

Local rumours up here have her coming into Rosyth to dry-dock in the New year to have these issues sorted, now that PoW is out. Be interesting to see if that happens, as other local scuttlebutt had the dry dock unable to take a completed QE class due to displacement issues. (Hence why such a long fitting out period afloat)
Davef68 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 09:53
  #4729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
To summarise. The RN standing commitments to reassure and defend British interests around the world are currently maintained by an Offshore Protection Vessel, a Royal Fleet Auxilliary..... and an unarmed shore establishment.

Counting and comprehension not a strong suit then?
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 21:14
  #4730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,837
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
The RN standing commitments to reassure and defend British interests around the world are currently maintained by an Offshore Protection Vessel, a Royal Fleet Auxilliary..... and an unarmed shore establishment.
Not far off:

Britain has no warships deployed overseas in 'unprecedented' move blamed on defence cuts:
Britain has no warships deployed overseas in 'unprecedented' move blamed on defence cuts
MightyGem is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 21:58
  #4731 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Funny how we're due for a round of budget 're-profiling' in the new year and all of a sudden the navy finds itself in the headlines with no warships at sea.....
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 07:14
  #4732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But there is an outcry over ‘unnecessary expense’ when new ones are being built in times of peace. (Not that right now seems particularly peaceful.)

Twere ever thus.
Brat is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 07:49
  #4733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I think the Japanese do it right - a steady flow of (relatively) low level builds with an incremental improvement in capability as they go along rather than "pulses" of new designs

That way you keep the build capacity, the learning curve is low and you don't have a situation where a whole class of your ships need replacing over a few years..............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 08:17
  #4734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin
Go right ahead and identify those requiring a deployed DD/FF or major warship at this particular moment.....
On these words, chiselled into stone by HM Treasury, the Royal Navy died.

I do take issue with your requirements claim regarding OPVs though. Taking the FI as an example the requirements call for a vessel considerably more capable than an OPV and that that vessel should be augmented by another within ‘x’ days to provide a balanced capability when required.

Using OPVs and RFAs in such roles is based on what we have left rather than the military requirement. The RN is being slowly strangled and leaving minor vessels in potential hotspots, with no possibility of roulement by a true combat vessel, is the worst possible outcome. It burns money to give the illusion of military capability whilst providing none.

Others have provided commentary on the wisdom of purchasing OPVs purely to give UK companies something to do, so whilst I will acknowledge it I will not repeat it here.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 08:33
  #4735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah - think of Coronel in WW1 when Spee caught Craddock with his old, out of date fleet.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 10:37
  #4736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Deployed overseas over the Holiday period are the following:

HMS Bangor, HMS Blythe, HMS Ledbury and HMS Middleton, supported by RFA Cardigan Bay and Fort Rosalie all conducting maritime security activity in the Gulf, with 849 NAS AWaCS Sea Kings embarked on Fort Rosalie.

RFA Mounts Bay is on patrol in the Caribbean.

HMS Clyde on duty in the South Atlantic with HMS Protector on survey duties.

HMS Enterprise is flagship of Standing Mine countermeasures Group 2 in the Mediterranean.

HMS Echo is conducting counter migrant operations in the Aegean.

One unidentified SSBN is on deterrent patrol "somewhere"

Six RN vessels in the UK are on Fleet Ready Escort standby.

A Type 45 AAW Destroyer is readying to deploy in early January to the Gulf.

A Type 45 AAW Destroyer will take over in early January as flagship of a NATO task group.

All of the above from the ROYAL NAVY, who I would trust more to know where their vessels are than that inaccurate poorly informed rag the Torygraph.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 10:42
  #4737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So nothing serious at sea except an SSBN - which is a VERY serious vessel
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 10:45
  #4738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Why is anything 'serious' other than an SSBN required at sea OVER XMAS AND THE NEW YEAR????
pr00ne is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 13:20
  #4739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Apart from tensions across NATO boarders including the Baltic and the gap, the shooting wars on the eastern Med, tensions and dust-up in the Middle East and standing commitments et al.

If not now then when?
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2017, 14:46
  #4740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Just this once...

Not one of which call in any way or shape whatsoever for the presence of a Destroyer or a Frigate!
pr00ne is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.