Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Defence: Public ignorance, the media, and cutbacks

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Defence: Public ignorance, the media, and cutbacks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2017, 18:15
  #741 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Sadly there is a danger that the knuckle draggers will insist it is.

Consider the outbreak of racist views following the recent Westminster attack. That young Muslim woman who was seen using her phone was picked out by the media and forced to explain herself - if she had been blonde would this have happened? Over on Jet Blast, someone wrote something along the lines of regarding all Muslims as terrorists. Just what Daesh want...
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 7th May 2017, 19:49
  #742 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 71
Posts: 195
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do we continue to have these stupid arguments? The fact is, we never see where the next threat is coming from. We continue to fashion our forces on the last threat. We have to have a broader vision and be more nimble in our procurement.
Remember MRA4 etc.....
MACH2NUMBER is offline  
Old 9th May 2017, 21:59
  #743 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Has purdah started yet? The MOD part of the .gov website still had FOI releases today.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 11th May 2017, 07:44
  #744 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
WEBF,
FOI requests continue under Purdah. All that changes is that as Parliament no longer exists the obligations of the FOIA no longer exist. which means that the 20 day turn round is no longer obligatory. The FOI teams still exist and FOI requests are still dealt with. As soon as Parliament is in existence again the 20 day obligation returns.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 08:41
  #745 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard Labour's Emily Thornberry on the Andrew Marr show say NATO would still be vital because we would need their help to move the Army off Salisbury Plain, as we don't have enough Frigates to move the Army...
Obi Wan Russell is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 09:52
  #746 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I've searched this thread and can't find any mention of immigration and Brexit.

Thats remarkable. Outside in the real world nobody gives the armed forces a second thought, the existential threats to the UK are immigrants and membership of the EU.

A majority of the population are willing to destroy everything to end FoM, the armed forces included.
peter we is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 10:02
  #747 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
peter we

Rubbish.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 13:57
  #748 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I've searched this thread and can't find any mention of immigration and Brexit."

maybe because it still has a tenous link to Military Avaiation - if immigration appears it'll be off to jet Blast.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 14:41
  #749 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That actually sounds rather negative Betty but I admit that politics does depress me a great deal and there isn't much in the Campaign so far to change my mind. I wish someone would at least TRY to tell the Public some truths but it all seems to be spin and ridiculous promises - all sides TBH
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 14:55
  #750 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough! I can't disagree with that!
betty swallox is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 19:38
  #751 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
"I've searched this thread and can't find any mention of immigration and Brexit."

maybe because it still has a tenous link to Military Avaiation - if immigration appears it'll be off to jet Blast.......
You are missing my point. Nobody is interested in defense, they are obsessed by immigration and the EU.

I cannot remember anyone instigating a discussion about the military threat from abroad since the end of the Cold War. An invasion of immigrants and the EU, thats another thing.

So, yes, there is complete public ignorance about defense because they can not see any threat.
peter we is offline  
Old 14th May 2017, 23:00
  #752 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Obi Wan Russell
Just heard Labour's Emily Thornberry on the Andrew Marr show say NATO would still be vital because we would need their help to move the Army off Salisbury Plain, as we don't have enough Frigates to move the Army...
I saw the interview, after Emily's tribute to NATO and concern about the lack of Frigates etc, Andrew Marr then played a videoed speech by Jeremy Corbyn from all the way back in 2011. In it he angrily accuses NATO as being a threat to world peace and so on... Back to Emily in the Studio again and with an exasperated tone utterly, disbelieving that Mr Marr hadn't spotted the obvious flaw here by not realising that the interview was given in 2011, a lot of water had flown under the Bridge since then!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 07:44
  #753 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
I think you are missing OWR's point - she appeared to be unaware that:

a. Frigates are not for moving troops.
b. If the RN did not have a manpower issue (due to cuts mostly) more ships could be fully operational.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 19:19
  #754 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 525
Received 166 Likes on 89 Posts
I think you're both missing the point, which is simply that she's a window-licking halfwit......
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Old 17th May 2017, 19:26
  #755 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NaB - and she speaks highly of you too.....
hat, coat....
Wander00 is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 20:16
  #756 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought her half witted-ness was implicit in my post...
Obi Wan Russell is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2017, 21:49
  #757 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Does the current situation with a hung Parliament have implications for defence?
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2017, 08:33
  #758 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Probably'.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2017, 09:55
  #759 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
WEBF,

No.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2017, 17:46
  #760 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by WE Branch Fanatic
Does the current situation with a hung Parliament have implications for defence?
Potentially, maybe.

Purdah, I believe is now over and there's no change of government so it should be carrying on from where we left off. But of course, the Government is in a very different place from where it was 2 months ago. It now needs to tread carefully; bold decisions are unlikely to be made and politically difficult issues might get put on the back burner which could affect Defence if they are linked in any way. And if austerity is cancelled, expect to see cuts in budgets to keep other politically sensitive areas e.g. welfare, education, policing etc funded. Could Defence spending take a hit or be re-profiled to keep benefits flowing to stave off the potential threats inherent in a second election down the line? Of course, with books fudged to then hit the 2% target.
Melchett01 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.