UK signs Hawk 128 contract
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK signs Hawk 128 contract
A £450 million deal was signed earlier today, adding 26 more aircraft to the two demonstrators already built; by my maths after including the development contract that's about £21.8 million per trainer. They'd better be good at that price!
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...anced+jet.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...anced+jet.html
Dreadful decision back in '03, still a dreadful decision now. The next dreadful decision will come when the shortly-to-be-announced Training Systems Partner (poor soul) tries to blend together a fully integrated 25 year FT system (aka UKMFTS) with all 19 streams accommodating this dreadful decision whilst still complying with the lead service's other, yet-to-be-announced singleseatfastjetpilot 'stipulations'. The end result will of course be a dreadful mismatch for 18 of the 19 aircrew streams complete with their pukey-greygreen undercurrents.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BAE and HAL said to be forming Hawk deal
An interesting development. Reuters
I had hoped that the new RAF Hawks would at least lead to more work for UK factories! But maybe things won't be that simple.
Britain's BAE Systems is in talks with Indian aircraft maker Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) to jointly make Hawk advanced jet trainers in India for the global market, the Mint newspaper reported on Tuesday.
State-run HAL currently manufactures the aircraft under license from BAE Systems for the Indian Air Force, Mint said.
The paper reported that HAL chairman Ashok K. Baweja said in an e-mail to it that both firms were doing a feasibility study for the joint venture, which would also focus on doing repair and overhaul of the Hawk aircraft, sold by BAE Systems worldwide.
State-run HAL currently manufactures the aircraft under license from BAE Systems for the Indian Air Force, Mint said.
The paper reported that HAL chairman Ashok K. Baweja said in an e-mail to it that both firms were doing a feasibility study for the joint venture, which would also focus on doing repair and overhaul of the Hawk aircraft, sold by BAE Systems worldwide.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothing but speculation and rumour, I am told by a friend 'in the know.' But no secret that HAL will be making Hawks for the Indian Air Force and potentially also Indian Navy too.
I guess there may also be involvement in other BAE programmes through an industrial cooperation package which will no doubt accompany the Indian AF Hawk deal.
RAF Hawks already in production at BAE facility in Brough, East Yorkshire.
I guess there may also be involvement in other BAE programmes through an industrial cooperation package which will no doubt accompany the Indian AF Hawk deal.
RAF Hawks already in production at BAE facility in Brough, East Yorkshire.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hawk 128, no gun ?
Unless Wart On have designed it out - nothing would surprise me - the Hawk inc. 100 series, as developed by Kingston / Dunsfold, could happily carry a 30mm Aden on the centreline, which worked jolly well.
I am hardly a supporter of BAe, having left voluntarily as internal politics sickened me, but I can say they price their aircraft relatively honestly including 'product support' - a very significant part of the bill indeed, which at the time - I don't know about now - the Americans never did, quoting bare airframe prices.
As far as guns go, of course the Hawk 200 has 2 x 27mm Mausers carried internally.
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...g?t=1199221552[/IMG]
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...bscannon-1.jpg
When the Swiss went for the Hawk, they specified a link collection system had to be designed & fitted; apparently it's fine to fire cannon shells at people, but considered rude to litter their place up with links in the process.
(Yes I do know it was for their test ranges, and in the end they sold them to go back to what they do best - standing around making chocolate while pretending not to be aligned with anyone )...
I am hardly a supporter of BAe, having left voluntarily as internal politics sickened me, but I can say they price their aircraft relatively honestly including 'product support' - a very significant part of the bill indeed, which at the time - I don't know about now - the Americans never did, quoting bare airframe prices.
As far as guns go, of course the Hawk 200 has 2 x 27mm Mausers carried internally.
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...g?t=1199221552[/IMG]
http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/e...bscannon-1.jpg
When the Swiss went for the Hawk, they specified a link collection system had to be designed & fitted; apparently it's fine to fire cannon shells at people, but considered rude to litter their place up with links in the process.
(Yes I do know it was for their test ranges, and in the end they sold them to go back to what they do best - standing around making chocolate while pretending not to be aligned with anyone )...
Last edited by Double Zero; 2nd Jan 2008 at 00:07.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quelle Surpise !
I have been informed privately by a kind and up-to-date Ppruner that the new Hawk 128 only 'simulates' ( ! ) the centreline Aden, and the Hawk 200 now only has 1 internal 30mm Aden!
At Dunsfold we never got as far as weapons trials on the Hawk 200 before the whippet-botherers stole the design to keep themselves afloat, though from what little I know, if one's going to carry an internal gun, make it worthwhile, otherwise stick a gunpod on a pylon when the need arises ( if there's trials data to let you aim it ).
Simulators are great for their job, but as the Hawk 128 in 'virtual' mode is said to portray none of the handling characteristics of carrying the Aden, maybe now I can see why it was discounted early on by the UAE - funny how that didn't happen first time round when they did buy honest aeroplanes...
If this is an example of Wart On marketing,
A, I am not remotely surprised,
B, God help the Typhoon - could be the best thing ever made ( well it's theoretically possible ) but in the hands of this lot...
At Dunsfold we never got as far as weapons trials on the Hawk 200 before the whippet-botherers stole the design to keep themselves afloat, though from what little I know, if one's going to carry an internal gun, make it worthwhile, otherwise stick a gunpod on a pylon when the need arises ( if there's trials data to let you aim it ).
Simulators are great for their job, but as the Hawk 128 in 'virtual' mode is said to portray none of the handling characteristics of carrying the Aden, maybe now I can see why it was discounted early on by the UAE - funny how that didn't happen first time round when they did buy honest aeroplanes...
If this is an example of Wart On marketing,
A, I am not remotely surprised,
B, God help the Typhoon - could be the best thing ever made ( well it's theoretically possible ) but in the hands of this lot...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"RAF and RN pilots will move seamlessly from the Hawk to Typhoon and globally the Hawk is used to train pilots for front-line aircraft such as F-16, Gripen and Su-30," the company said."
Is there something we haven't been told?
Is there something we haven't been told?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no need to worry, all the lovely moneys going to a good cause- the 2012 olympics!!!. so when the last nimrod falls from the sky and the carriers sail with no air group and the pumas run out of life etc etc, we can watch some idiots run round a track and throw poles about, still , we will be left with some nice unfinished stadiums
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: where the streets have no IEDs. Yet.
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Double Zero, is your source quite certain about the Hawk 200's internal cannon ? The Omani 200s don't seem to be so equipped and I was told that none are; apparently the Aden pod is the only option.
Incidentally, is Warton still trying to sell the 200 or is the tooling now being turned into cutlery somewhere near Shanghai ?
Incidentally, is Warton still trying to sell the 200 or is the tooling now being turned into cutlery somewhere near Shanghai ?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the sun
Age: 52
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With regards to cost...for the MOD it is not just a unit cost. Hundreds of millions have been paid up front for Hawk 128 development...all in support of UK Plc.
I can't imagine that that any will be painted red with smoke units fitted. Would be a massive underutilisation of the training systems on board. There are enough cheap Hawk T1 airframes to last many many years of swooping and looping.
Raytheon had quoted an extra million per jet to fit a 'modern' radar whilst retaining all the training functionality of the synthetic one. A shame really that this trainer is unable to fulfil a reasonable aggressor or potential AD role. Lets face it, the 100 Sqn Hawk T1A is not really suitable for modern day front-line training.
I can't imagine that that any will be painted red with smoke units fitted. Would be a massive underutilisation of the training systems on board. There are enough cheap Hawk T1 airframes to last many many years of swooping and looping.
Raytheon had quoted an extra million per jet to fit a 'modern' radar whilst retaining all the training functionality of the synthetic one. A shame really that this trainer is unable to fulfil a reasonable aggressor or potential AD role. Lets face it, the 100 Sqn Hawk T1A is not really suitable for modern day front-line training.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hawk 128 & 200
F34NZ,
I'll ask around & let you know; when I first said re. the Hawk 128 Aden ' unless Warton have designed it out ' even I hoped I was joking !
But no, common sense remains an extremley un-common commodity, and I'd love to see the REAL costs of designing the simulated gun versus supplying the actual, established item, not to mention the fact that with the real thing it would handle realistically & have a useful war role...
I would have thought there are a lot of 30mm Adens around somewhere, after the retirement of the Sea Harrier & the fiasco of the GR5 25mm ( I photographed that sorry saga at Dunsfold but don't have any pic's now, they may be in some archive unless BAe/Royal Ordnance binned them through emarassment !).
Re. The Hawk 200 the last I heard when with BAe was it would get the Mauser 27mm, presumably because it was in favour with the Whippet Botherers who'd grabbed the Hawk jigs ( being unable to produce an exportable aircraft themselves ).
Now I've recently been told of the single 30mm Aden - will ask around.
It's a huge pity the RAF can't afford the fully fitted Hawk 100 series, let alone the Hawk 200 which would have been very useful - great range / endurance, but last I heard was it can't use AMRAAM due to launch velocity; I did photograph G-Hawk carrying Skyflash ( emphasise carrying not firing, I don't know the requirements for that weapon ).
Striking that the Sea Harrier could eject-release AMRAAMS from the proposed fuselage stations ( acoustic fatigue and weapon cost eventually knobbled the 4 - missile configuration ) but then one can hang just about anything on a Harrier without slowing it much, so I guess the speed margin was enough to rule out the Hawk 200; perhaps a Test Pilot or Flight Tester might comment.
As for the Hawk 200 tooling becoming cutlery, I hesitate to say it but that wouldn't surprise me either, as it's a good aircraft !
I'll investigate all this lot & report back, in case anyone's interested.
I'll ask around & let you know; when I first said re. the Hawk 128 Aden ' unless Warton have designed it out ' even I hoped I was joking !
But no, common sense remains an extremley un-common commodity, and I'd love to see the REAL costs of designing the simulated gun versus supplying the actual, established item, not to mention the fact that with the real thing it would handle realistically & have a useful war role...
I would have thought there are a lot of 30mm Adens around somewhere, after the retirement of the Sea Harrier & the fiasco of the GR5 25mm ( I photographed that sorry saga at Dunsfold but don't have any pic's now, they may be in some archive unless BAe/Royal Ordnance binned them through emarassment !).
Re. The Hawk 200 the last I heard when with BAe was it would get the Mauser 27mm, presumably because it was in favour with the Whippet Botherers who'd grabbed the Hawk jigs ( being unable to produce an exportable aircraft themselves ).
Now I've recently been told of the single 30mm Aden - will ask around.
It's a huge pity the RAF can't afford the fully fitted Hawk 100 series, let alone the Hawk 200 which would have been very useful - great range / endurance, but last I heard was it can't use AMRAAM due to launch velocity; I did photograph G-Hawk carrying Skyflash ( emphasise carrying not firing, I don't know the requirements for that weapon ).
Striking that the Sea Harrier could eject-release AMRAAMS from the proposed fuselage stations ( acoustic fatigue and weapon cost eventually knobbled the 4 - missile configuration ) but then one can hang just about anything on a Harrier without slowing it much, so I guess the speed margin was enough to rule out the Hawk 200; perhaps a Test Pilot or Flight Tester might comment.
As for the Hawk 200 tooling becoming cutlery, I hesitate to say it but that wouldn't surprise me either, as it's a good aircraft !
I'll investigate all this lot & report back, in case anyone's interested.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DZ,
As a Hawk QWI, I would ask you, just 1 question: Do you train the pilot to 'Fire' the gun system? Or rather, how to properly 'Aim and Fire' it?
I would suggest, the; Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Bit...... happens after the important bit.
Only a thought,
Advo
As a Hawk QWI, I would ask you, just 1 question: Do you train the pilot to 'Fire' the gun system? Or rather, how to properly 'Aim and Fire' it?
I would suggest, the; Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Bit...... happens after the important bit.
Only a thought,
Advo
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although, I will admit...... just video-ing the wpns techniques, is no subsitute for the sound, feel, smell and sight of 30mm HEi doing it's thing! or even 3Kg Terror Bombs destroying literally 2 ft of sand! Ahhhh Pembrey......But, The future,
The 'progress' that is the Hawk128, will still train pilots to the high standards the T1a does, but just about every ounce of 'soul' has been extracted by the 'bean counters', (not by the aircrew that have been involved.).
From what I hear, it will make an ideal Typhoon trainer.
Happy New Year!
Advo
The 'progress' that is the Hawk128, will still train pilots to the high standards the T1a does, but just about every ounce of 'soul' has been extracted by the 'bean counters', (not by the aircrew that have been involved.).
From what I hear, it will make an ideal Typhoon trainer.
Happy New Year!
Advo
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No internal gun was ever fitted to a production Hawk 200. I don't even think anything ever made it onto the prototypes.
There's still (unless they've mucked about with the internals in the last ten years or so) a bunch of cutouts in various frames where the barrel etc for a single cannon could go (the design got downsized from two to one, IIRC) but the cost of fitting the internal gun (and complexity of AV mounts for all the avionics being shoehorned in around the gun) ended up settling the question in favour of the same 30mm centreline pod that the two-seaters use.
There's still (unless they've mucked about with the internals in the last ten years or so) a bunch of cutouts in various frames where the barrel etc for a single cannon could go (the design got downsized from two to one, IIRC) but the cost of fitting the internal gun (and complexity of AV mounts for all the avionics being shoehorned in around the gun) ended up settling the question in favour of the same 30mm centreline pod that the two-seaters use.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Advocatus, I think you answered your own question !
I completely agree the soul of the aircraft was removed by bean counters not aircrew; no-one who saw Jim Hawkins display ZG200 will ever forget it - stall turns & tailslides, sustained high speed outside turns with a wingtip say 100' off the deck...
Sadly for one or other cause - it seems the traditional exuberant ( practice ) display reason, but with a couple of other factors thrown in - that ended tragically, while a later display crash sounds plain daft.
I was told, others who were there can confirm or refute this, that on a Middle East sales tour Jim had ONE round loaded into the pod on G-Hawk, and a 40 gallon oil drum put on a post; he dived & got it with his one shot.
The tale may have grown in the telling, so if someone ( I'll only listen to Dunsfold staff who were there ! ) comes back and says he had full ammo' & it was a football field...having seen his skill, though, and having flown with him ( my stomach has yet to catch up ) I tend to believe the story.
Talking of carrying stores, I did photograph G-Hawk carrying a Sea Eagle too among many things, though the ground clearance on the centreline looked a bit iffy, and presumably it was planned to use a future Hawk / external radar source or just the missile seeker...
Will attach a few H200 prototype shots; haven't found out yet if the aircraft is still being promoted -
I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's been binned in case potential buyers see the price difference re. the Typhoon - that's the sort of logic, and bean-counter, which made me vote with my feet from BAe in the first place, along with the treatment of the Taylor Scott incident...
I completely agree the soul of the aircraft was removed by bean counters not aircrew; no-one who saw Jim Hawkins display ZG200 will ever forget it - stall turns & tailslides, sustained high speed outside turns with a wingtip say 100' off the deck...
Sadly for one or other cause - it seems the traditional exuberant ( practice ) display reason, but with a couple of other factors thrown in - that ended tragically, while a later display crash sounds plain daft.
I was told, others who were there can confirm or refute this, that on a Middle East sales tour Jim had ONE round loaded into the pod on G-Hawk, and a 40 gallon oil drum put on a post; he dived & got it with his one shot.
The tale may have grown in the telling, so if someone ( I'll only listen to Dunsfold staff who were there ! ) comes back and says he had full ammo' & it was a football field...having seen his skill, though, and having flown with him ( my stomach has yet to catch up ) I tend to believe the story.
Talking of carrying stores, I did photograph G-Hawk carrying a Sea Eagle too among many things, though the ground clearance on the centreline looked a bit iffy, and presumably it was planned to use a future Hawk / external radar source or just the missile seeker...
Will attach a few H200 prototype shots; haven't found out yet if the aircraft is still being promoted -
I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's been binned in case potential buyers see the price difference re. the Typhoon - that's the sort of logic, and bean-counter, which made me vote with my feet from BAe in the first place, along with the treatment of the Taylor Scott incident...
The first Hawk 200, ZG200, in build.
ZG200 on final engine run ( Rolls Royce engineer Keith Wardle ) on the afternoon before it's first take-off.
Flight Test engineer Steve Potton in the only 'posed' photo's I ever took at Dunsfold ( I never usually had the luxury of planning ) - with the mock-up Hawk 200, Mauser fairings et al.
Steve signed copies as the 'Airfix Project Pilot' though has done plenty of FJ flying in the back seat- but he went to the Dark Side up North, the only one who was so tempted.
Steve signed copies as the 'Airfix Project Pilot' though has done plenty of FJ flying in the back seat- but he went to the Dark Side up North, the only one who was so tempted.
Last edited by Double Zero; 5th Jan 2008 at 08:28.