flydubai Kandahar day out
Apparently flydubai are arranging charters to Kandahar - hq for Terry Taliban and extremely dangerous. This latest bombshell ( pun intended) has been announced by notice from the much discredited and Walter Mittyesque safety 'manager'. The notice would be a candidate for a comedy award if the subject was not so serious. Highlights of the notice include guidance on - I kid you not - what to do in the event of a rocket attack. Apparently lie down and cover your ears is the best advice. I am reminded of the famous Blackadder sketch when Baldrick asks Blackadder for guidance when stepping upon a mine: " Well, Baldrick, traditionally one hurls oneself 200 feet into the air and scatters four limbs in all directions..." Other gems include the fact that rocket attacks are designed to harass and are not really serious!
Further proof, if proof were needed that there is no, or limited safety culture within flydubai if the personal safety of the crews is treated in such a cavalier fashion. You can be assured that any 'safety assessment' will be a whitewash to fit the commercial case (even that makes no sense). Any aspirant flydubai pilot, many other issues notwithstanding, may care to carefully consider their decision to work for a company that imposes operations into a war zone. Aside from the personal safety aspect there are other issues - not addressed officially - whereby personal insurance etc could be negated. Please be guided accordingly/ cheers. |
olster - spot on!
Here are some actual quotes, cut & paste, from flydubai's memo to staff about ops into Kandahar:
And flydubai still continues to preach "The safety of our crews is our #1 priority". Well, yet again, we can see what a crock of **** that really is! |
Don't worry guys,
Remember , each time questions are asked to the chief pilot's meetings about safety issue like fatigue related with the 4 sectors at night or flying to Kabul , Kandahar etc... The answer is always the same " IT IS LEGAL " What can you say to that ? But what annoys me the most is that when there were guys who have been flying there and the chief pilot asked them about their experience , NONE of them did say that they think it was dangerous !!! |
Wrt to the advice to 'cover the eyes', is that so you don't have to witness your colleagues been blown to pieces ?!
dubaigong - Look at the following descriptions:
|
I am reminded of the famous Blackadder sketch when Baldrick asks Blackadder for guidance when stepping upon a mine: " Well, Baldrick, traditionally one hurls oneself 200 feet into the air and scatters four limbs in all directions..." However whilst that isn't so important, the contents of the breifing received actually is. As mentioned by BDB how ludicrous is it to receive infomation about what to do in a rocket attack and then declare that safety of the crew is the number one priority. The brief looks to be something that our heroes in the military forces might receive, you know the ones who fly aircraft equipped with chaff, flares, able to fly evasive manoeuvres etc. Not sure we checked that options box....... |
OMG
Brilliant Mr Olster!!!! Your usual wit and repartee appreciated by all. FYI, Flydubai just received certificate of all weather operations competency for Landings- CAT2 DH100 - RVR300m and Take Off -125m just what one needs after your 4th night in a row returning from Chittagong/Kathmandu/Khartoum/4-sector "red-eye" etc!
BUT IT IS LEGAL!!!!!!!!!!! |
Just sooooo thrilled at the thought of Kandahar I thought I would do some research, rather wish I hadn't.
Afghan Journal | Analysis & Opinion | Reuters.com :eek: However Capt. D Spaceman say all is safe, and he would rather fly in there than Kabul as the ground forces can control the area under the approach path. So that's nice. End of May saw a UN helicopter destroyed in a rocket attack and the main road into town is the highest danger category on the UN rating categories. To only be travelled in armored cars. So that's nice too. Safety culture my arse. :* F-C. |
What shower of Sh**e
This place is clearly dangerous. FZ are treating the crews with contempt. My Pals at FZ are now looking eleswhere for work. :rolleyes: |
This is from the FCO website.
Safety and Security - Local Travel - Air Travel Airlines operating to the EU are required to meet the safety standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organisation. The EU Aviation Security Committee (ASC) blacklisted all Afghan airlines flying to the EU on 23 November 2010 due to the poor record of its civil aviation oversight system. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) employees in Afghanistan have been advised not to travel on airlines blacklisted by the EU ASC. Some other airlines that operate in and out of Afghanistan may not meet international safety standards. Safety and Security - Local Travel - Transiting UAE Flying to Dubai and then transferring is the most common route into Afghanistan. It is illegal to transit the United Arab Emirates carrying unlicensed personal protection equipment. This includes, but is not limited to, body armour (including ballistic vests), weapon holsters and handcuffs. Other specialist technical equipment such as satellite phones, listening and recording devices, powerful cameras and binoculars, while freely available in the UK, may also require licenses. Persons found carrying any such items without a license may be subject to conviction resulting in imprisonment and substantial monetary fines in accordance with Emirati law. Just who are we flying to Kandahar? The brief says non military.... therefore it must be civilian security staff, i.e. Ex military......... It certainly isnt a holiday destination is it..:= |
Foreign & Commonwealth Advice
The Brits at FDB might wish to read this:
Afghanistan travel advice To summarise: Southern Afghanistan:
Kabul:
|
Well, they're not going to be botanists, that's for sure :\
|
If you can stay away from Alfukistand!
|
Big Softies....
|
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I would check your life insurance policy.
You might not be covered in a war zone. |
According to the last memo sent to us and the meeting organized by the management this afternoon , there is no problem at all with our insurance as it covers also war zone...
We should not be worried at all as the company will never send the aircraft if it was not safe to do so... they said... And after talking to pilots who have been there with previous company , our chief pilot told us that these pilots have confirmed that there was nothing to worry about.... Let's see... |
tin hat time
The point that seems to be conveniently glossed over is that this is a thinly disguised contract for the military. We are not taking a bunch of local goat herders on holiday, this is a specific charter for military support staff. Now lets all hope that GAG has managed to get the powers that be to pay the locals to leave us alone as once the word gets around, the local lads with their MANPADS may be taking more than a passing interest in us. It's not the risk during the turn around, it's the first & last 5000ft operating into & out of the place that is more of a concern. We have to be lucky every time we go in to KDH, Terry & co only have to be lucky once. Stick a BOZ pod on the jet, pay me extra for putting my nuts on the block & I might, just might consider it. Make it obligatory (unless of course you're a scandic A scaler :E), then it's toodle pip from me.
|
Clearly a case of 'patriotism' getting in the way of good sense!
The closing paragraph of the CP's recent 'Kandahar Update' said:
It was a pleasure and a humbling experience to serve these people and give them a pleasant experience after what they have been through. They had waited two hours before boarding (DFS policy) and it was a joy to see their pleasure when we gave them the cold towels. They were tired and happy. Honestly it was an honor to serve them. I think we owe them this. So why should an aircrew (who've been given no choice about operating in to / out of that same war zone and who are paid no extra for doing so) find it "humbling" and / or an "honor" and / or why just should an aircrew "owe" such people anything ?!! Wasn't it Samuel Johnson who once said, "Patriotism: The last refuge of the scoundrel" ?!! :ugh: |
I would like to know how many aircraft operate in and out of Khandahar each day?
|
How many civilian movements, you mean? Not many. We're there once a week with a large cargo aircraft. I don't see many other civil movements. Plenty of F16s, UAVs, C130s etc. I can't say I feel 100% comfortable flying into Kandahar but it's not so bad that I want to quit my job to avoid it. Most companies that fly there issue instructions similar to those quoted above. They're probably designed to protect the company's ass, not yours, in case something goes wrong. An example: "On arrival in parking, all crews will determine the location of hardened, semi-hardened or improvised protective shelter nearest to the aircraft's parking stand" etc etc. To go to Kandahar or not - the choice is yours.
|
Wish it was
If it was MY choice i would not go. Unfortunately it is not.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:15. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.