Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK Gentleman agreement with Copa Airlines

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK Gentleman agreement with Copa Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Oct 2015, 11:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: On a pressurized vessel
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK Gentleman agreement with Copa Airlines

Hi folks

With EK coming soon to PTY more and more NG riders from Copa are considering to join EK.
One of the last pilots that left Copa to go to EK was told by Copa's VP of flight Ops that they had signed and agreement with EK and there where will be no hiring of pilots from Copa-EK or vice versa.


Anyone out there with a friend at HR has heard this Rumor.?


PS; I bet that after 6 months of lunching, only the former Copa pilots will be the ones doing the "world longest flight" Ass and back cracking!!! (Only good reason to stay pressurized for that long would be to come home)
Mypprun3 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 04:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shower house of Africa
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flight to Panama would be operated by a 4 man crew.

Would probably be a 24 hour layover.

good luck getting home 😄

I hope my assumptions are false for the sake of the crew operating the flight.
Ghost_Rider737 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 09:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would probably be a 24 hour layover
Ghost_Rider737 are you willing to put a gentleman's bet on that? Until SQ receive their A350-900LR, EK will be operating the longest flight time between two city pairs, and therefore will come with a lot more media attention than usual. I can assure you it will not be a 24 hr layover.
777-200LR is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 14:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Travelling East
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt there are many who work here who would consider the management team in any shape or form, as "gentlemen".

Besides, I doubt they would voluntarily cut off a potential source of new employees at the moment, the crew strength is starting to reach critical numbers.
skyvan is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 16:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: South of North
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they can actually fly it. Rumor has it that the LR can't make it without the aux tanks, which were removed. Commercial did not know they were removed!

Like I said--rumor.
Trader is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 16:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Danger - Deep Excavation
Posts: 338
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trader
If they can actually fly it. Rumor has it that the LR can't make it without the aux tanks, which were removed. Commercial did not know they were removed!

Like I said--rumor.
Thanks. I will check this one. Lots of Latinos and their spouses will be upset. PTY connections on COPA are all they talk about.
DCS99 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2015, 21:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trader
If they can actually fly it. Rumor has it that the LR can't make it without the aux tanks, which were removed. Commercial did not know they were removed!

Like I said--rumor.


Not all of the 10 were even purchased with 1 AUX tank option (Boeing offers up to 3).

The frames that were delivered with it had it removed relatively quickly. Anyone who spreads the rumor that the B777-21HLRs are unable of DXB-PTY non stop does not know the aircraft.

Furthermore, they do not even have the maximum MTOW that Boeing offers (when theres no need to use it, there is no need to pay the associated overflight and landing fees). Those who fly it, know it has a 343,369kg MTOW. Boeing offers up to 347,452kg. Saved money on the purchase cost, and can always be purchased later on.

The westbound sector to Panama City, is blocked at 17h 35m. You are looking at 16h 45m to 17h of actual flight time. Initially they wont have data for STATCON, so they will be using the good old CONT 20.

Using 7.5t/hr (conservative) on the -21HLR even with a unrealistic 18 hour westbound sector you are looking at 135t of TRIP fuel which leaves an additional 10t for: 30 minutes FRSV, CONT, ALTN. As long as the fuels SG acceptable. If fuel volume is ever a factor due to temps (0440z DXB departure) they have the ability to keep it cool and hence lower the SG. They did this regularly for the DXB-SFO sector before they had polar area approval from the DGCA. And you wont be seeing EK251 taxing around for 45minute sin rush hour. They will arrange priority through on the ground through ATC like they always have for the ULR's. Very common back when the -31HER was doing DXB-SFO/LAX/IAH.


Considering the ready to go DOW on the fleet is ~163t, with a full fuel load of 145t that still leaves you a good 35t of payload. Config is 8/42/216 and with a full load of pax + bags you are still looking at ~8t of paying freight with a EZFW in the 198t range.

If they want more payload they can purchase the additional ~4t of MTOW from Boeing and if they really regularly need another 5700kg of fuel then they can re-install the single AUX tank. (No they did not trash them). Boeing actually recognized EK engineering for developing their own tooling in-house, to easily lift the AUX tank in the belly and remove it in short time.

To sum it up...this flight will be MTOW limited (structurally) and not fuel volume limited. Being on the fuel volume limited on the payload/range curve, each tanks gets you a additional ~200nm of range. (fixed ZFW).


Last edited by B-HKD; 14th Oct 2015 at 22:14.
B-HKD is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2015, 12:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Lucky they still have a 345. Seems if you want to carry a useful load a long way you need a bus.
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2015, 13:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Right Seat
Age: 33
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This rumour doesn't make any sense since Copa is not hiring foreigners for the moment. There is a big crisis starting in Latin America and I won't be surprised if they fire people.

On the other side, EK needs pilots
Ex-Brazilian is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2015, 23:08
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: On a pressurized vessel
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ex Brazilian; Copa has stoped hiring Pilots of any nationality (even locals) DEC at least for the next 3 years, we are over 200 FOs waiting to be upgraded and so far no firing on their plans but if they do, Good bye to the foreigners with lower seniority and up, their plan is to be 100% local. (As most of the airlines in this latitudes)
In the other hand they are giving away Company Offered Leave of Absence to the pilots who want to do something else for up to 6months. (It will be cool to join EK without having to resign by requesting the leave of absence) if EK then back

B-HKD thank you for sharing your knowledge, it will be cool to fly every now and then someone that sharp who likes to share experiences + knowledge and No show off and arrogance.

Back to the topic, anybody has heard anything about the No poaching agreement?
Myppru3!!!
Mypprun3 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2015, 21:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Right Seat
Age: 33
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, why you think EK would sign a gentleman agreement with an airline that is not competing for pilots? I just can't understand.... we all know that EK offers a much better contract and work conditions.... CM is a company where you should buy your uniform with your own money, don't forget it
Ex-Brazilian is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2015, 02:19
  #12 (permalink)  
Kapitanleutnant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Several years ago, I flew with an FO who had come to EK from Copa. I asked him if he felt more fatigued/tired there than at EK. He actually said Copa.

I later saw a captain's bid sheet from there and it was much like EK's. 9 days off and only 2 in a row max days off for the bid I saw. It looked pretty busy to say the least.

It was my opinion at that time, that to go to Copa would be the proverbial frying pan to the fire.

The only thing IMO better there was it was only 2 hours max time zone changes for all flights. Some all night stuff, but not nearly as much as EK does.

Kap
 
Old 17th Oct 2015, 06:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Doctor's waiting room
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, why you think EK would sign a gentleman agreement with an airline that is not competing for pilots?
This is not about Emirates and Copa competing for the same applicants but rather any agreement that maybe in place, would be designed to prevent movement from Copa to Emirates.

Perhaps such an agreement if it exists, was a pre requisite that had to be finalised prior the route starting? We are largely oblivious to the peripheral issues that require negotiation prior to the starting of a new route and especially to a new country. This maybe one of them?

A defintive answer is not likely to be found on this website and if you really want to know, then you would be better off enquiring elsewhere.
Emma Royds is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2015, 14:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Right Seat
Age: 33
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still can't understand this rumour.... So CM need a good reason to allow EK deliver 250 pax a day at PTY? I think CM would thanks a lot EK because they are facing now a big crisis in his sector and the conectivity that EK is bringing to PTY will make a lot of money to CM and Panama.

Not to mention the Company Unpaid Leave offered by CM, which means they have more pilots than they need and if EK take some of them would be great for CM I think, since firing people is not cheap. It's a win-win deal...


That's why I can't understand this rumour...
Ex-Brazilian is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2015, 19:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Panama
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FALSE RUMOR

Beleive me, it is false!!!!! It is just a rumor. No one could believe that EK would sign such kind of agreement. Furthermore, Copa has enough pilots at the moment!!! Additionally, A friend of mine just signed with EK last month......
BOEINGDRIVER16 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2015, 10:12
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it is not a rumour. there is some type of agreement made. not sure of the actual contest, a straight ban or just a few, but there is an agreement .
well its a rumour site , but still.
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2015, 03:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Panama
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry WHAT IS THE REALITY??

Copa Airlines is offering 6 months of leave to the pilots because they have too much pilots!!!!! But at the same time blocking the pilots to apply with Emirates?????????? What is the reason? Two friends of mine had the simulator canceled and the interview in Dubai without a solid reason...... It is legal????
BOEINGDRIVER16 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2015, 19:24
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are wondering if something like that is legal....you really do not want to come to Emirates. The shock may be to great.
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 13th May 2016, 13:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any news about this? It seems to be completely true.
Gustavo_CDT is offline  
Old 13th May 2016, 13:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: IN the SKies
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is absolutely true. I have been affected by this no poach agreement. I dont understand why Copa would enter this while offering LOA. seems like a F U from management
ifly462 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.